Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: On Catholicism
May 20, 2009 at 5:44 pm
Ah you mean did she think of herself (sorry I'm still having a little trouble understanding here) as a 'Catholic Christian' or simply a 'Christian' despite she was specifically 'Catholic' like IOW: 'was the 'Catholic' part import to her?'
?
EvF
Posts: 18
Threads: 2
Joined: May 21, 2009
Reputation:
0
RE: On Catholicism
May 21, 2009 at 11:16 am
Catholics aren't Christians? I'm slightly confused as to why you would think that. I'll agree that Catholicism is indeed a strange form of Christianity. Strange in the respect that is seems to determine whether a person is a Christian or not depending on if they attend masses regularly, go to confession, ect. Not on the true parts of being a Christian (i.e. having good morals, believing in the Bible, ect.). I know this because I was Catholic. Even though I am no longer a Christian, the Catholic Church is most definitely incorrect (assuming that the Bible is correct). It is a pretty screwed up religion any way you slice it. All religions stemmed from it.
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: On Catholicism
May 21, 2009 at 11:23 am
It is of course still Christianity. Because Catholics still follow and believe in Jesus Christ.
EvF
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: On Catholicism
May 21, 2009 at 1:41 pm
Another angle...
Say you had reforms like with the Social Services department at Harringay Council in the uk recently (a vry sad child abuse case highlighted the shortcomings in procedures)(let's pretend this was a black and white case). The department underwent changes brought about by review and now operate differently, and one would hope effectively.
Now consider the reformation. Martin Luther pointed out the severe shortcomings in what the Catholic church had become. From this a new church was born, and is known as the protestant church. This was no small protest. It was extremely severe and far reaching.
So the church had to change to get back to what they were about in the first place. The reform facilitated this.
Some people refused to be reformed and went on in the same old way. After all a lot of money and power were yours if you carried on in your old corrupt ways. From the 4th Century (this was the 16th) the church had gone severely astray making secular allegiances to gain that power and wealth which lead to times of stark contrast with actual Christian values.