NJ Doctor Would Reportedly Rather Let Patient Die Than Treat Him For Gay Disease

[LastPoet]

[frankiej]

Oh you can't compare what I would do to zombies with humans. Zombies are there to be destroyed...and to eat everyone I don't like. Whereas humans are there to be messed with.

[thesummerqueen]

bahahahaha, we actually just had a big Army of Darkness party this past Saturday night - 11 drunk people crowded on one L-shaped couch with munchies, hard cider, snobbishly good beer and scotch from sherry casks. I've never had so much fun watching that movie.

[amateurlyinsightful]

I don't know if anyone has posted this yet, but there was a similar case a while back. It didn't involve Aids though.

---

I don't know if anyone has posted this yet, but there was a similar case a while back. It didn't involve Aids though.
Mother gave birth. Child was going to die in a couple of days. Instead of donating their organs to children they decided to let their child live since it was against the bible to kill their child to save others even though the child was going to die.

[Colanth]

Quote from my erstwhile king: "Better she should lose her patients until she realizes her folly." I told him these people don't realize folly, and he said "But they do realize going poor."

"Poor"? They invented a word for what she did, a long time ago. It's "malpractice". There's absolutely no medical reason for her to withhold treatment, and that's the only thing that's admissible in a malpractice suit. I hope the patient finds an attorney who has a lot of zeros in his computer, because the amount I'd sue for in his case would be a few times the value of the entire planet. And I'm not a litigious person.

(A flogger, huh? Nah, at my age I'd probably have another heart attack.)