Posts: 523
Threads: 1
Joined: May 22, 2012
Reputation:
9
RE: The debate is over
July 5, 2012 at 4:40 pm
(July 5, 2012 at 1:50 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: (July 5, 2012 at 6:38 am)Zen Badger Wrote: You have yet to answer my original question Frods.
Exactly what aspects of religion is Dawkins ignorant of? Apologies Zen 
All aspects except the superficial level that a child might understand. He references equally naive sources. Watch him against serious opposition and you'll see him acknowledge them. His child like fixations get him fame and fortune. He'd be killing the cash cow. I wish he chose integrity instead.
You haven't cited anything. Except your own obsessive aversion to him.
Really, fruito, you make your superstitions out to be like they are advanced calculus or something. Even the village idiot can see that the Emperor has no Clothes.
Posts: 279
Threads: 20
Joined: November 7, 2011
Reputation:
10
RE: The debate is over
July 6, 2012 at 1:25 am
Bleh... God Delusion... don't do it! Seriously just direct them to an atheist forum instead. Sadly enough Dawkin's may be classified as a "horseman of atheism" but he should stick to biology.
Posts: 5389
Threads: 52
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
48
RE: The debate is over
July 6, 2012 at 5:29 am
(July 5, 2012 at 1:50 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: (July 5, 2012 at 6:38 am)Zen Badger Wrote: You have yet to answer my original question Frods.
Exactly what aspects of religion is Dawkins ignorant of? Apologies Zen
All aspects except the superficial level that a child might understand.
Please be more specific, what specific aspects are you referring to?
Quote: He references equally naive sources. Watch him against serious opposition and you'll see him acknowledge them. His child like fixations get him fame and fortune. He'd be killing the cash cow. I wish he chose integrity instead.
He maintains religion is a lie, what opposition can be mustered against that.
Except the usual drivel that gets dragged out here on a regular basis.
"You're not a christian so you won't understand"
"You just need faith"
Blah,blah,blahdedy blah........
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Posts: 532
Threads: 5
Joined: January 30, 2012
Reputation:
5
RE: The debate is over
July 6, 2012 at 5:59 am
Quote:LMAO the ingrate comes to an atheist forum braying about "if theism is to have importance..."
Theism is festering and dying. The world will be a far better place once it finally crawls into a foetid cesspool and dies the miserable death it deserves.
What a scintillating intellect. You're the Jerry Falwell of atheism.
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: The debate is over
July 6, 2012 at 7:16 am
(This post was last modified: July 6, 2012 at 7:16 am by fr0d0.)
(July 6, 2012 at 5:29 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Please be more specific, what specific aspects are you referring to? Well Dawkins ignorance is a large topic. I have no desire to get bogged down once more in arguments that black is white. Can't I just say that ALL of his theological observations are based on ignorance? Pick one and I'll address it for you if you really want to. I've pointed out the fallacies in them all here before, as have many others. A quick google search will also pull up multitudes of theologians ridiculing his ignorance with reason.
(July 6, 2012 at 5:29 am)Zen Badger Wrote: He maintains religion is a lie, what opposition can be mustered against that. On what grounds? > on the grounds that there is no empirical proof of God. I rest my case. Twat.
Posts: 5389
Threads: 52
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
48
RE: The debate is over
July 6, 2012 at 7:33 am
(July 6, 2012 at 7:16 am)fr0d0 Wrote: (July 6, 2012 at 5:29 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Please be more specific, what specific aspects are you referring to? Well Dawkins ignorance is a large topic. I have no desire to get bogged down once more in arguments that black is white. Can't I just say that ALL of his theological observations are based on ignorance? Pick one and I'll address it for you if you really want to. I've pointed out the fallacies in them all here before, as have many others. A quick google search will also pull up multitudes of theologians ridiculing his ignorance with reason. Well how about you pick just one and we'll go from there.
Quote: (July 6, 2012 at 5:29 am)Zen Badger Wrote: He maintains religion is a lie, what opposition can be mustered against that.
On what grounds? > on the grounds that there is no empirical proof of God. I rest my case. Twat. Darfaq did I just read?
Because there is no empirical proof of god, Dawkins is wrong.
I don't know what you're smoking Frods, but it's HEAVY SHIT.
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Posts: 3872
Threads: 39
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
43
RE: The debate is over
July 6, 2012 at 7:35 am
(This post was last modified: July 6, 2012 at 7:35 am by Ace Otana.)
(July 6, 2012 at 7:33 am)Zen Badger Wrote: (July 6, 2012 at 7:16 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Well Dawkins ignorance is a large topic. I have no desire to get bogged down once more in arguments that black is white. Can't I just say that ALL of his theological observations are based on ignorance? Pick one and I'll address it for you if you really want to. I've pointed out the fallacies in them all here before, as have many others. A quick google search will also pull up multitudes of theologians ridiculing his ignorance with reason. Well how about you pick just one and we'll go from there.
![[Image: popcorn.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.freesmileys.org%2Fsmileys%2Fsmiley-basic%2Fpopcorn.gif)
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Posts: 523
Threads: 1
Joined: May 22, 2012
Reputation:
9
RE: The debate is over
July 6, 2012 at 9:15 am
(July 6, 2012 at 5:59 am)CliveStaples Wrote: Quote:LMAO the ingrate comes to an atheist forum braying about "if theism is to have importance..."
Theism is festering and dying. The world will be a far better place once it finally crawls into a foetid cesspool and dies the miserable death it deserves.
What a scintillating intellect. You're the Jerry Falwell of atheism.
How droll that you would wag a fellow theist at me in your sad attempt to insult. It tells me that you know full well what sort of ingorant fucktards you all really are. Bravo.
Posts: 532
Threads: 5
Joined: January 30, 2012
Reputation:
5
RE: The debate is over
July 6, 2012 at 9:27 am
(This post was last modified: July 6, 2012 at 9:27 am by CliveStaples.)
(July 6, 2012 at 9:15 am)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: How droll that you would wag a fellow theist at me in your sad attempt to insult. It tells me that you know full well what sort of ingorant fucktards you all really are. Bravo.
Bad reasoning--but then, you're a raging atheist, so I wouldn't expect otherwise. The most it could tell you would be that I know full well what sort of ignorant fucktards you and Jerry Falwell are.
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”
Posts: 4234
Threads: 42
Joined: June 7, 2011
Reputation:
33
RE: The debate is over
July 6, 2012 at 10:16 am
Why is it that you two continue to carry on an insult contest in every thread in which you debate?
Trying to update my sig ...
|
