Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 30, 2024, 2:49 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Big Bang Theory
#21
RE: Big Bang Theory
(November 7, 2012 at 9:49 pm)Truth Matters Wrote: The Big Bang is the absolute physical beginning from physical nothingness at the singularity boundary. Atheists do backflips to avoid the logical implications. They are in denial

I understand.
What you mean to say is that science makes predictions based on theory. When reality disagrees with the theory, science changes the theory to agree with observed reality

See?

Not so difficult, huh?
Reply
#22
RE: Big Bang Theory
(November 7, 2012 at 9:49 pm)Truth Matters Wrote: The Big Bang is the absolute physical beginning from physical nothingness at the singularity boundary. Atheists do backflips to avoid the logical implications. They are in denial

Oh, is it?

Who told you that?
Reply
#23
RE: Big Bang Theory
(November 7, 2012 at 11:37 pm)jonb Wrote:
(November 7, 2012 at 9:49 pm)Truth Matters Wrote: The Big Bang is the absolute physical beginning from physical nothingness at the singularity boundary. Atheists do backflips to avoid the logical implications. They are in denial

Oh, is it?

Who told you that?

If they are christain and speak about creation, they are stupid and ignorant. It's simple as that.
Reply
#24
RE: Big Bang Theory
Not necessarily: Georges Lemaître, Belgian priest, astronomer and professor of physics at the Catholic University of Louvain and originator of the Big Bang model.

If they are xtian and speak about creation in terms that deny reality, simply to keep the fairytale alive, they are stupid and ignorant.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#25
RE: Big Bang Theory
(November 7, 2012 at 9:49 pm)Truth Matters Wrote: The Big Bang is the absolute physical beginning from physical nothingness at the singularity boundary. Atheists do backflips to avoid the logical implications. They are in denial

Existence has always existed because non-existence can't exist.

Explain why God is required for the creation of the parts of the physical universe that has thus far been detected by science. Explain how atheists are in denial. Plus: see my sig.
Reply
#26
RE: Big Bang Theory
no one knows but its still far more logical that a big bearded guy created all things we know in 7 days
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQmM7-ByoFl8US4y_iRp5-...g86MG6N622]

Reply
#27
RE: Big Bang Theory
Six. Seven days is just silly.

Smile
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#28
RE: Big Bang Theory
Yeah, like it would take "God" that long, I mean, seriously? He could have done it in 5 days actually, he just couldn't be bothered.
Reply
#29
RE: Big Bang Theory
Plus he was so shagged out by the effort he needed a day off. The old Olympian gods could create this idiot into the middle of the next millennium and not even break a sweat.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#30
RE: Big Bang Theory
(July 5, 2012 at 11:09 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:The honest answer is nobody knows yet

Which is still a better answer than "jesus."

Why is embracing a Materialist belief (a belief that cannot possibly explain the absolute physical beginning) better than a fully sufficient and rationally plausible explanation?

(November 8, 2012 at 4:34 pm)DoubtVsFaith Wrote:
(November 7, 2012 at 9:49 pm)Truth Matters Wrote: The Big Bang is the absolute physical beginning from physical nothingness at the singularity boundary. Atheists do backflips to avoid the logical implications. They are in denial

Existence has always existed because non-existence can't exist.

Explain why God is required for the creation of the parts of the physical universe that has thus far been detected by science. Explain how atheists are in denial. Plus: see my sig.

Yes, non-existence cannot exist. Yet the physical Universe had an absolute physical beginning to it's existence. Therefore, something non-physical (Immaterial, Timeless, and spaceless existed) as the prime causal agency.

The entire physical Universe began. Science has fully established this. It's irrelevant that science is limited in it's ability to detect some regions. Atheists are in denial to deny the absolute physical beginning verified by Big Bang - or pretend it has no relevance in evidence.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Star Trek theory Won2blv 10 1567 June 24, 2023 at 6:53 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  No Big Bang? Silver 22 3017 March 17, 2018 at 9:00 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Simulation Theory according to Dilbert Neo-Scholastic 110 18062 May 10, 2017 at 12:06 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Intelligent Design as a scientific theory? SuperSentient 26 6812 March 26, 2017 at 11:07 pm
Last Post: SuperSentient
  Simulation Theory Documentary Neo-Scholastic 25 6092 August 30, 2016 at 3:45 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  New theory on how life began KUSA 19 4220 March 3, 2016 at 6:33 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  The big crunch. dyresand 3 1033 March 30, 2015 at 7:37 am
Last Post: robvalue
  New theory on Aboigenesis StuW 11 4108 February 26, 2015 at 4:11 pm
Last Post: Heywood
  Can you give any evidence for Darwin's theory? Walker_Lee 51 11159 May 14, 2014 at 11:30 am
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Creationists: Just a theory? Darwinian 31 8098 October 26, 2013 at 1:25 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)