Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 4:03 pm
(This post was last modified: July 15, 2012 at 4:05 pm by Shell B.)
So I said every single person who has not stood trial at GB is guilty? Fucking Christ. What is the agenda for making up shit I didn't say? Seriously. Do you just need someone to spout your strawman arguments at so you can get them out or are you just ragging it?
(July 15, 2012 at 4:02 pm)Hovik Wrote: (July 15, 2012 at 3:51 pm)Shell B Wrote: I'm not a fucking judge or on a jury, knuckle dragger. A personal opinion that the odds are in favor of at least one being guilty has nothing to do with the above legal term.
Wow, for an admin, you sure don't know how to act with much civility in debate. I'm not even going to validate your bullshit with further discussion, seeing as you clearly aren't interested in recognizing the irrationality of your position.
You mean like jumping into every thread your girlfriend is in to gang up on anyone who looks at her sideways or making up things that people didn't say so you can look self righteous. Suck a fart. Yeah, I'm an admin. That doesn't mean I cannot defend myself against stupid accusations by a bunch of absolutist duck farts.
Posts: 4344
Threads: 43
Joined: February 21, 2012
Reputation:
64
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 4:05 pm
(July 15, 2012 at 4:02 pm)Hovik Wrote: Wow, for an admin, you sure don't know how to act with much civility in debate.
Irrelevant. I haven't read the rest of this thread but none the less
Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
143
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 4:13 pm
(July 15, 2012 at 4:02 pm)Hovik Wrote: Wow, for an admin, you sure don't know how to act with much civility in debate. I'm not even going to validate your bullshit with further discussion, seeing as you clearly aren't interested in recognizing the irrationality of your position. I don't blame her, what with so many people making strawmen of her position rather than discussing what she actually wrote. She isn't interested in "recognizing the irrationality" of her position because you aren't even dealing with her position; you are dealing with a fantasy version of your own creation.
Posts: 2694
Threads: 42
Joined: May 6, 2012
Reputation:
43
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 4:16 pm
I'm saying your statement is unfounded. Completely.
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 4:23 pm
Definitely. Indubitably. Absolutely. *rolls eyes*
I just told you what my basis for that was. If you want to ignore it, have at it. You have no other option than that or creating more strawmen.
Posts: 2694
Threads: 42
Joined: May 6, 2012
Reputation:
43
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 4:31 pm
Or you could understand what I am saying. Just because some are guilty, doesn't mean most are guilty. Your basis is flawed.
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 4:36 pm
(This post was last modified: July 15, 2012 at 4:36 pm by Shell B.)
Did I say most? I don't think I did. Your reading comprehension is appalling.
Posts: 242
Threads: 7
Joined: May 6, 2012
Reputation:
17
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 4:43 pm
(This post was last modified: July 15, 2012 at 4:47 pm by Hovik.)
(July 15, 2012 at 4:03 pm)Shell B Wrote: So I said every single person who has not stood trial at GB is guilty? Fucking Christ. What is the agenda for making up shit I didn't say? Seriously. Do you just need someone to spout your strawman arguments at so you can get them out or are you just ragging it?
(July 15, 2012 at 4:02 pm)Hovik Wrote: Wow, for an admin, you sure don't know how to act with much civility in debate. I'm not even going to validate your bullshit with further discussion, seeing as you clearly aren't interested in recognizing the irrationality of your position.
You mean like jumping into every thread your girlfriend is in to gang up on anyone who looks at her sideways or making up things that people didn't say so you can look self righteous. Suck a fart. Yeah, I'm an admin. That doesn't mean I cannot defend myself against stupid accusations by a bunch of absolutist duck farts.
Where I post is my prerogative. If we happen to post in the same threads, it might have something to do with the fact that we're next to one another all the time, and I happen to be involved in what she's involve in and vice versa.
You're an admin, so fucking act like it instead of resorting to emotionally-driven insults. You have every right to defend your bullshit, but don't throw a hissy fit when somebody calls you on it.
Ex Machina Libertas
Posts: 2694
Threads: 42
Joined: May 6, 2012
Reputation:
43
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 4:49 pm
(July 15, 2012 at 4:36 pm)Shell B Wrote: Did I say most? I don't think I did. Your reading comprehension is appalling.
Shell B Wrote:Guilty means they did it. You and I both know that odds are that many of them did.
I'm sorry. "Many".
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: Obama and Guantanamo Bay
July 15, 2012 at 4:53 pm
(This post was last modified: July 15, 2012 at 4:57 pm by Shell B.)
(July 15, 2012 at 4:43 pm)Hovik Wrote: You're an admin, so fucking act like it instead of resorting to emotionally-driven insults. You have every right to defend your bullshit, but don't throw a hissy fit when somebody calls you on it.
Don't presume to tell me what to do. I am first and foremost a member. I can speak to anyone however I feel like speaking if I am not doing it in an official capacity. And my insults are about insight, not emotion. You seem like a fucking kid with an agenda who is willing to whip strawmen out of thin air so you have the soapbox you so desperately seek. I don't mind saying it. That doesn't mean I am emotional. If I was as bad as you would like to paint me as, I would just ban you out of anger, wouldn't I? If I can manage to keep my position on staff out of it, you should manage as well.
Since you haven't responded to a single thing I actually said, you can't say any of it is bullshit. Thanks for more "I don't have to have an argument cuz you a meanie" post. Grow a pair.
"Odds are many of them did."
From that, you lot of monkeys with internet access have come up with, I don't believe in the right to a fair trial, I think everyone there is guilty, I am okay with the prison, etc. Am I getting this right? Shit, I didn't even say many of them did. I said that odds lean that way.
By the way, Hovik, way to stand strong for two replies after you declared yourself not talking to me anymore. Fucking typical.
|