Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 11:49 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Food for thought
#31
RE: Food for thought
(July 16, 2009 at 8:40 pm)padraic Wrote: "There were no sacred books,

Really.

Ever heard of:

"The Book of Coming Forth By Day", aka "The Book of The Dead" ( Egyptian )

"The Epic of Gilgamesh" (Sumerian)

The Pali Texts? (Buddhist)

"The Popul Vuh"? (Mayan)

The Vedas and the Upanishad. (Indian)

We seem to be arguing from different perspectives. I guess we'll need to agree to differ. I have nothing further to say on this matter.

It depends on how you define "sacred." Most scholars do not believe those texts were considered "sacred" as they were not "of God." They were important and played a religous role, but were not seen as "sacred" as were the Biblical texts which had to be copied verbatim. It is actually splitting hairs with the definition. I prefer the phrase "religious texts."
"On Earth as it is in Heaven, the Cosmic Roots of the Bible" available on the Amazon.
Reply
#32
RE: Food for thought
(July 16, 2009 at 8:40 pm)padraic Wrote: "There were no sacred books,

Really.

Ever heard of:

"The Book of Coming Forth By Day", aka "The Book of The Dead" ( Egyptian )

"The Epic of Gilgamesh" (Sumerian)

The Pali Texts? (Buddhist)

"The Popul Vuh"? (Mayan)

The Vedas and the Upanishad. (Indian)

We seem to be arguing from different perspectives. I guess we'll need to agree to differ. I have nothing further to say on this matter.

Just to add what Ledo said about the difference between religious inspired/themed books and sacred texts.

The Pyramid Texts and the Book of the Dead were not accesible to the priesthood let alone the public at large. They were not copied or transcribed and certainly not read privately. They are dramatic scripts to be acted out by actors when initiating an individual. Priests, by definition, are neither the initiators nor initiated, they are the proxy's by which the initiatic masters relate with the public and vice versa.

Now in my previous post I only mentioned that there were no sacfred texts in Egypt, you have taken this to mean there are no sacred texts, period. That's not what I said, but even the texts you describe are not neccesarily sacred.

The Epic of Gilgamesh was written by poets and/or dramatists for mass consumption. It is lacking in religious content, the major exception being the descent into the underworld, although this is a well known theme even among the masses. This Epic in many respects is a forerunner to Homer's Epic poems, and which certainly wasn't a sacred text.

The Pali texts yes can be considered sacred, but I never said there are no sacre texts in the world, I just said, Ancient Egypt never had any. The books of the Pali Canon are probably the clearest example of sacred texts you described considering their origin in orally transmitted teachings. (which continues to this day)

The Poul Vuh was written by Christian missionaries, as was the Irish Lebor Gabala Eireann. A good source when researching a culture's religious beliefs, but not a text held sacred by the people concerned.

And yeh, the Vedas and Upanishads are definately sacred (although remember that the Oral versions are always the best)

And next time, please quote my words within the context in which they were written. I was clearly talking about Egypt.
Reply
#33
RE: Food for thought
(July 17, 2009 at 1:41 pm)Anto Kennedy Wrote:
(July 16, 2009 at 8:40 pm)padraic Wrote: "There were no sacred books,

Really.

Ever heard of:

"The Book of Coming Forth By Day", aka "The Book of The Dead" ( Egyptian )

"The Epic of Gilgamesh" (Sumerian)

The Pali Texts? (Buddhist)

"The Popul Vuh"? (Mayan)

The Vedas and the Upanishad. (Indian)

We seem to be arguing from different perspectives. I guess we'll need to agree to differ. I have nothing further to say on this matter.

Just to add what Ledo said about the difference between religious inspired/themed books and sacred texts.

The Pyramid Texts and the Book of the Dead were not accesible to the priesthood let alone the public at large. They were not copied or transcribed and certainly not read privately. They are dramatic scripts to be acted out by actors when initiating an individual. Priests, by definition, are neither the initiators nor initiated, they are the proxy's by which the initiatic masters relate with the public and vice versa.

Now in my previous post I only mentioned that there were no sacfred texts in Egypt, you have taken this to mean there are no sacred texts, period. That's not what I said, but even the texts you describe are not neccesarily sacred.

The Epic of Gilgamesh was written by poets and/or dramatists for mass consumption. It is lacking in religious content, the major exception being the descent into the underworld, although this is a well known theme even among the masses. This Epic in many respects is a forerunner to Homer's Epic poems, and which certainly wasn't a sacred text.

The Pali texts yes can be considered sacred, but I never said there are no sacre texts in the world, I just said, Ancient Egypt never had any. The books of the Pali Canon are probably the clearest example of sacred texts you described considering their origin in orally transmitted teachings. (which continues to this day)

The Poul Vuh was written by Christian missionaries, as was the Irish Lebor Gabala Eireann. A good source when researching a culture's religious beliefs, but not a text held sacred by the people concerned.

And yeh, the Vedas and Upanishads are definately sacred (although remember that the Oral versions are always the best)

And next time, please quote my words within the context in which they were written. I was clearly talking about Egypt.



I question if the Popul Vuh was written by Christian missionaries. It may have been, but I have other theories about it.
The Egyptian Book of the Dead is somewhat misnamed. There is no specific Book of the Dead. A book was placed in the coffin of every dead person as a guide to the afterlife. Each book was supposed to have been designed for the specific deceased based on an generic template. That is my understanding.

Gigamesh has gods in it, hence it has "religious content." It is also a cosmic myth as evidenced by the "Heavenly Bull."
"On Earth as it is in Heaven, the Cosmic Roots of the Bible" available on the Amazon.
Reply
#34
RE: Food for thought
LEDO, check out this book, about astronomical links to myth in Ireland and their physical manifestation in neolithic architecture.

Island of the Setting Sun
- In Search of Ireland's Ancient Astronomers

http://www.mythicalireland.com/iotss/isl...ng-sun.php

It's right up your alley.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Came across something on YouTube and had a very immature thought GODZILLA 20 2833 October 5, 2018 at 9:30 am
Last Post: onlinebiker
  How do religious people justify raising and slaughtering animals for food? Alexmahone 113 12548 December 6, 2017 at 7:15 pm
Last Post: Little Rik
  A Thought Experiment for Believers and Atheists Alike chimp3 39 8498 October 11, 2017 at 3:25 am
Last Post: Ivan Denisovich
  I guess you never thought about it, did you? Little Rik 68 16079 September 24, 2017 at 3:06 pm
Last Post: JackRussell
  Lust, sex, random thought PETE_ROSE 295 29222 August 23, 2016 at 12:14 pm
Last Post: Joods
  A passing thought A_Nony_Mouse 1 1076 April 10, 2013 at 8:55 am
Last Post: Zen Badger
Thumbs Down Buying you with food Napoléon 36 12053 March 4, 2012 at 3:01 pm
Last Post: Tempus
  So ...IF you are without adequate food water and housing this= your religiousness? KichigaiNeko 7 2927 August 10, 2011 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  More thought leads to less certainty...? inflectious 7 2405 May 20, 2011 at 6:57 am
Last Post: tackattack
  A Thought from a Deist Cinjin 42 14427 March 12, 2011 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Ace Otana



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)