God does not follow the first principle of morality. Why not?

[Ryantology]

Actually it is. Do you want to think about it or do you need me to explain it?

Definitely need an explanation here, because I asked where it is said that God considers rape, slavery, torture etc. to be 'bad' with the expectation that you'd have some kind of scriptural answer.

[The Grand Nudger]

Yeah, Drich...gonna have to dissappoint you here, I had no hand in AIDS, I didn't create the virus (or the environment it sprang from), nor did I design the biological systems off which it thrives. With credit comes culpabaility. You want to claim the credit for all of this, there's really no way around accepting culpability in all of this. On the count of AIDS, you can go fuck yourself. Those who die of AIDS die -of AIDS- my action (or inaction) is not required for AIDS to do what it does. I want to be clear here so I'm going to repeat myself....go fuck yourself.

I think that it's important to mention here that the only creatures looking to do anything about this at all are human beings. There is no lab full of angels anywhere on earth diligently striving towards a cure, nor are there any going door to door in the hopes of preventing the spread of this disease. Not only is god absent..he can't even be bothered to send his damned lackeys. This isn't difficult for me to process or explain, because the entire bit..god, angels, holy this and thats...all of it is bullshit. Just like your response. For you, it should be a bit trickier...but you are clearly incapable of handling this whatsoever...and so we see this separation of credit and culpability. It isn't surprising to me at all, because at it's very core your faith is all about washing your hands of culpability for actions which are properly credited to you- and the very first entity to demand said service appears to have been your god.

Again...go fuck yourself.