Posts: 3117
Threads: 16
Joined: September 17, 2012
Reputation:
35
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better?
October 10, 2012 at 8:58 pm
(This post was last modified: October 10, 2012 at 8:58 pm by Darkstar.)
Isn't it funny when people accuse others of 'playing god'? I mean, if it's really that easy to impersonate god, then he isn't so special, now is he? And then there are those people who won't use medicine because they think it interferes with god's plan (pretty sure they're rare...because they all died of plague...  ). How can a human invention defeat god so easily?
John Adams Wrote:The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.
Posts: 28330
Threads: 114
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better?
October 10, 2012 at 9:08 pm
(This post was last modified: October 10, 2012 at 9:10 pm by Angrboda.)
(October 10, 2012 at 4:14 pm)Brian37 Wrote: (October 10, 2012 at 12:58 pm)apophenia Wrote: Intelligent design would be fascinating if real, if only to give me a reason to go back into math. However it's not, for some surface reasons, but also deep ones that will likely not go away. The most important of which is the difficulty in determining what one means when one says that something "looks designed" in a way that is rigorous and usefully applicable. Next is that the intuition which powers the argument rests on a faulty and invalid syllogism. Intelligent design, even if true, will need a different logical foundation. And one of its worst issues is that even if you prove design, you still have no real evidence there is a designer behind it. I'm not completely persuaded by Humean skepticism of causality, but if all you've got is tail, you don't know if there's a dog attached to it. Design may demand a designer, but design itself cannot "cause" a designer to be. Jefferson thought that his deistic god simply started everything and stepped aside.
I love what Jefferson contributed to humanity as far as secularism and protection of dissent, but if alive today even he would not get a pass from me.
The word "intelligence" cannot be removed from a thinking cognition even if that "cognition" is picking up the dice and doesn't care where they land. It still requires something thinking to pick up the dice in the first place.
I put your definition with Jefferson's generic idea in the same catigory as even pantheists who claim that the universe is "intelligant".
All three still postulate that thinking does not require a material brain and evolution says otherwise. It is a dodge to say that this non material thinker is not intervening.
You sir, are a perfect example. Of what I don't know just yet, but I'm sure I'll think of something.
How simple ideas can go so wrong over such a short distance in your brain, if understood, would make the Tesseract obsolete.
Posts: 1928
Threads: 14
Joined: July 9, 2012
Reputation:
32
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better?
October 10, 2012 at 9:13 pm
I like living in a meaningless universe.
Posts: 8781
Threads: 26
Joined: March 15, 2010
Reputation:
29
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better?
October 11, 2012 at 12:28 am
(October 10, 2012 at 5:49 pm)System of Solace Wrote: (October 10, 2012 at 3:00 pm)Godschild Wrote:
Nice dodge. I'm sure any intelligent human could see that Brian's priority in that post wasn't defending German's idea. This leaves us a few clues about you.
I gave a defense for the design "The German" rejected, neither you nor Brian 37 have, the only thing either of you can do is throw around words that make no sense to the OP. So, you see, I dodged nothing it's both of you who have dodged my claims of the better design. So much for intelligence from either of you.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Posts: 4196
Threads: 60
Joined: September 8, 2011
Reputation:
30
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better?
October 11, 2012 at 12:37 am
Intelligent design: could we do better?
Hell yeah!
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Posts: 8781
Threads: 26
Joined: March 15, 2010
Reputation:
29
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better?
October 11, 2012 at 12:56 am
(October 10, 2012 at 5:49 pm)System of Solace Wrote:
Brian37 Wrote:I love the bullshit fallacy that atheists are attempting to be god themselves. They never consider another option.
I did not say atheist in my response, you are putting words to my statements that are not there. You are also trying to say I included all nonbelievers, also untrue, shame on you for using Lucifer's tactic of deception, do you really think the nonbelievers here are going to fall for such deceit.
Brian37 Wrote:God does not exist AND humans cannot be gods because gods dont exist.
What? You make no sense whatsoever. Your reasoning for why man can not be God is unfounded, for one, man's mortal life rules him out from being God.
Brian37 Wrote:It simply bothers believers that god is nothing but a product of their own wishful thinking. If anything that is what makes beleivers act like gods because they always claim to have magic tin foil rabbit ears that magically give them the message on the God channel.
Again your childish replies have no merit to them, why would a believer think they could be what they worship. 
Brian37 Wrote:I will never claim to be god. It would be like claiming I could be Super Man or Mickey Mouse.
Above you said it was because God does not exist, oh I see trying to be funny you are, giant fail.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Posts: 28330
Threads: 114
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better?
October 11, 2012 at 1:08 am
(October 11, 2012 at 12:37 am)IATIA Wrote: Intelligent design: could we do better?
Hell yeah!
A four year old with an Etch-A-Sketch could do better.
Posts: 143
Threads: 5
Joined: October 5, 2012
Reputation:
0
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better?
October 11, 2012 at 2:42 am
(October 10, 2012 at 3:06 pm)Napoléon Wrote: (October 10, 2012 at 7:49 am)Akincana Krishna dasa Wrote: Why not? Why don't you think it looks that way?
The better question is why do you think it does...
Go on, roll out the 'order of the universe' bullshit.
Scientists can't create one flower. Nature is creating them in countless numbers all the time. Who should get credit for being intelligent?
Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare
Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare
Posts: 5598
Threads: 112
Joined: July 16, 2012
Reputation:
74
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better?
October 11, 2012 at 5:23 am
(October 11, 2012 at 2:42 am)Akincana Krishna dasa Wrote: (October 10, 2012 at 3:06 pm)Napoléon Wrote: The better question is why do you think it does...
Go on, roll out the 'order of the universe' bullshit.
Scientists can't create one flower. Nature is creating them in countless numbers all the time. Who should get credit for being intelligent?
Who's Nature?
Posts: 143
Threads: 5
Joined: October 5, 2012
Reputation:
0
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better?
October 11, 2012 at 5:54 am
(October 11, 2012 at 5:23 am)Ryantology Wrote: (October 11, 2012 at 2:42 am)Akincana Krishna dasa Wrote: Scientists can't create one flower. Nature is creating them in countless numbers all the time. Who should get credit for being intelligent?
Who's Nature? Good question.
Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare
Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare
|
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)
