Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 9:44 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Morality without the righteous. What is right and wrong?
#11
RE: Morality without the righteous. What is right and wrong?
(March 12, 2013 at 5:35 pm)Darkstar Wrote:
(March 12, 2013 at 5:21 pm)Tranquility Wrote: The detriment and advantage to the individual is implied in both the golden rule and Kant's more refined version of it.
It's called empathy. Maybe some people can put their own selfish motivations into even that, but it certainly isn't necessary.

I can't argue with that. I do many things out of the care I have for others rather any sense of it being the right or wrong thing to do.
Reply
#12
RE: Morality without the righteous. What is right and wrong?
Wouldn't the care of others fall under the remit of your reaction to a given thing if you were placed in their shoes? Or does this care spring, source unknown or difficult to pin down, without such a consideration? I'd call that projecting self interest, personally. I wouldn't argue that this is the entirety of empathy, but it would seem to my mind to be a core component of it (and it at least offers the beginings of an explanation for a behavior which invokes a known and extremely powerful motivator). Sometimes I think that self interest or "selfish motivations" wouldn't get such a swift taboo appraisal if it were understood as a part of those behaviors and motivations that we positively value (and that does seem to be the case, cue the altruistic chimps and their honeycombs).
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#13
RE: Morality without the righteous. What is right and wrong?
I think so. I think we're just talking about different aspects of the same thing. One being empathy (understanding the effects on others). The other being concern (the motivation to act accordingly).
Reply
#14
RE: Morality without the righteous. What is right and wrong?
(March 12, 2013 at 6:39 pm)Rhythm Wrote: I'd call that projecting self interest, personally.

Well, it depends on what you mean by that. Do you mean that you hope that person will be nice to you in the future because you were nice to them, or some other thing that is difficult to desribe? (The former may happen sometimes, but I think that latter is still common).
Reply
#15
RE: Morality without the righteous. What is right and wrong?
Am I the only one who understands moral statements to mean there is a standard of dos and don'ts in behavior to which we have an obligation or duty to comply?

"It is wrong to (insert behavior of choice)." This statement means the behavior is a don't according to the standard.
"It is right to (insert behavior of choice)." This statement means the behavior is a do according to the standard.

I can't get my head around it to mean anything else, which is why I ask what the word means.
Reply
#16
RE: Morality without the righteous. What is right and wrong?
(March 12, 2013 at 3:51 pm)Tranquility Wrote: "It is wrong to cause harm to others."

What does wrong mean?

"It is right to be helpful to others."

What does right mean?

Am i getting de ja vu or is there already 2 other threads with this same sort of topic up?

http://atheistforums.org/thread-17592.html

Maybe i am getting de ja vu i can only find one


Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.

Impersonation is treason.





Reply
#17
RE: Morality without the righteous. What is right and wrong?
Perhaps so! I'll read through the topic.

I notice you replied to the topic. Do you "feel" there is a standard of dos and don'ts in behavior to which we have an obligation or duty to comply? Or do you mean something else when you say that something is right or wrong, if you'd even make that kind of statement?
Reply
#18
RE: Morality without the righteous. What is right and wrong?
(March 12, 2013 at 7:00 pm)Darkstar Wrote:
(March 12, 2013 at 6:39 pm)Rhythm Wrote: I'd call that projecting self interest, personally.

Well, it depends on what you mean by that. Do you mean that you hope that person will be nice to you in the future because you were nice to them, or some other thing that is difficult to desribe? (The former may happen sometimes, but I think that latter is still common).

Sure, reciprocation would be a form of self interest (and a widely demonstrated firmly established well documented tenet of the vast majority of cultures studied) but also the sort of "if I were in his/her shoes" assessment. Firstly by isolating the issue, then projecting the self, appraising your reaction towards the simulated event, and then transferring that conclusion to the original subject. This is selfish, self interested behavior, but almost uniformly a selfish, self interested behavior (at it's very core..though granted we project it out) that is positively valued.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#19
RE: Morality without the righteous. What is right and wrong?
(March 12, 2013 at 10:03 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Sure, reciprocation would be a form of self interest (and a widely demonstrated firmly established well documented tenet of the vast majority of cultures studied) but also the sort of "if I were in his/her shoes" assessment.

I'm not quite sure I understand how empathizing with someone is selfish, especially if you do not expect anything in return (including being treated well by that person in the fututre). Wouldn't it be the opposite of selfish if you projected selfishness onto someone else and then fulfilled the projected desire exclusively for their benefit?
Reply
#20
RE: Morality without the righteous. What is right and wrong?
If the seat of your empathy is in putting yourself in the shoes of another, you are actually considering your self, not the other, and then extending the conclusions you reach out to the other (and they aren't always accurate).

If you shed the negative connotations of the word and allow yourself to analyze the process it's very easy to see why so many models of empathy as an extension of (a much simpler to explain) self interest are so prevalent.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Beauty, Morality, God, and a Table FrustratedFool 23 1756 October 8, 2023 at 1:35 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Why is murder wrong if Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is true? FlatAssembler 52 3739 August 7, 2022 at 8:51 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Belief without Verification or Certainty vulcanlogician 40 3240 May 11, 2022 at 4:50 pm
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  Is Moral Nihilism a Morality? vulcanlogician 140 10154 July 17, 2019 at 11:50 am
Last Post: DLJ
  Subjective Morality? mfigurski80 450 34899 January 13, 2019 at 8:40 am
Last Post: Acrobat
  Law versus morality robvalue 16 1327 September 2, 2018 at 7:39 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  What is wrong with FW? Little Rik 126 14011 August 17, 2018 at 4:10 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Objective morality: how would it affect your judgement/actions? robvalue 42 8219 May 5, 2018 at 5:07 pm
Last Post: SaStrike
  dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality Mystic 18 3501 May 3, 2018 at 10:28 am
Last Post: LastPoet
  Can somebody give me a good argument in favor of objective morality? Aegon 19 4409 March 14, 2018 at 6:42 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)