Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
The one disputed law of atheism for the readily confused
May 4, 2013 at 5:13 pm
Atheism is simply a disbelief in a deity.
It is not a belief in no deity. It is not what can be subclassified as atheistic.
Many times, on every day of this sites existence, this one point is made again and again.
There are guidelines and stickies saying such. But still the mantra gets trotted out.
Funny thing is... this is not by any means agreed upon by all atheists. Just the vocal majority. (They may actually be the true majority, it matters not.).
Herding cats. Pretty much sums it up.
Posts: 19650
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
91
RE: The one disputed law of atheism for the readily confused
May 4, 2013 at 5:30 pm
Well, well, well...
fr0d0
Posts: 9771
Joined: 1st March 2009
Took you long enough!
Posts: 3638
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation:
47
RE: The one disputed law of atheism for the readily confused
May 4, 2013 at 5:34 pm
(This post was last modified: May 4, 2013 at 5:41 pm by Simon Moon.)
Shocker! Some atheists vary on their own position regarding their atheism.
Yes, atheism is the disbelief in the existence of a deity. That could almost be said to be the threshold to be an atheist. SOME atheists also believe in no deity. But they still also have the position of disbelief in a deity.
EDIT: It isn't a 'law of atheism'.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Posts: 3638
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation:
47
RE: The one disputed law of atheism for the readily confused
May 4, 2013 at 5:39 pm
(May 4, 2013 at 5:30 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Well, well, well...
fr0d0
Posts: 9771
Joined: 1st March 2009
Took you long enough!
It's the small victories.
And who says we aren't doing any good by debating with theists?
If frods can finally get it, there may be hope for other theists.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: The one disputed law of atheism for the readily confused
May 4, 2013 at 5:45 pm
I got it way before I got here. 4 years times what... at least 5 times a day. There's always fresh blood to pick up the torch.