Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Refute a first cause which most people would call G-d AKA Deism
May 10, 2013 at 4:46 pm
So sayeth the jesus freak that even other jesus freaks consider an oddball!
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Refute a first cause which most people would call G-d AKA Deism
May 10, 2013 at 5:05 pm
I have no issue with deism or deists, personally. However, I see no practical difference in how I would personally live my live with or without knowledge or belief in a deistic god. With our current understanding of reality, god-as-first-cause seems to me to be unprovable and unfalsifiable, and it's not clear that such a being is necessarily necessary.
If a first cause turns out to be necessary (and this is not clearly the case, IMO), if someone wishes to call it "god", it's of no concern to me. How one could claim to know anything about such a being is beyond our capabilities (IMO) at present.
I'm content to say "I don't know" for now. Perhaps that will change.
Posts: 3637
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation:
47
RE: Refute a first cause which most people would call G-d AKA Deism
May 10, 2013 at 5:58 pm
(This post was last modified: May 10, 2013 at 6:01 pm by Simon Moon.)
(May 10, 2013 at 4:27 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: (May 10, 2013 at 8:32 am)Napoléon Wrote: Lawrence Krauss anyone?
He has nothing to say.
He has plenty to say backed by advanced study, research, coherent math, etc.
You probably meant that what he
does have to say disagrees with you.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.