Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 29, 2024, 11:53 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Would you ever cheat in a relationship?
#41
RE: Would you ever cheat in a relationship?
(May 29, 2013 at 8:09 am)dazzn Wrote: only "contemporary" society condemns racism. get with it. morals are ultimately transitory.
Yeah go and fuck yourself.
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK

The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK


"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Reply
#42
RE: Would you ever cheat in a relationship?
(May 29, 2013 at 8:09 am)dazzn Wrote: only "contemporary" society condemns racism. get with it. morals are ultimately transitory.
Yes, our feeling of morality has changed over the ages, but I think there is an underlying principle that hasn't changed, which is to reduce the amount of suffering for a specific group of individuals (the "in-group", as opposed to the "out-group" which is all live that must serve to minimize the suffering or maximize the utililty of the "in-group").

At least from what I can see all that has changed over the ages is the definition of this in-group, not the concept of morality itself.
"Men see clearly enough the barbarity of all ages — except their own!" — Ernest Crosby.
Reply
#43
RE: Would you ever cheat in a relationship?
...Why do these threads always insist on making me wish a large portion of humanity would just go up in a mushroom cloud? >:/
Reply
#44
RE: Would you ever cheat in a relationship?
I really don't see cheating as wrong, as long as I'm open to the fact that I may cheat. I make it very clear, I ain't playing no games...because I will find someone else.
Reply
#45
RE: Would you ever cheat in a relationship?
I've self-imposed a series of rules that will lead me to cheating. If any fails, I don't cheat.
1 - The other party must initiate... that is, the woman who I may cheat with would have to approach me and go through the motions. I don't take the first step. How likely is that? well... in 8 years of marriage, it hasn't happened once!
2 - The other party must be beautiful.... I mean more beautiful than my wife... To me, beauty is all about the face. It's got to be worth it, after all!
3 - The other party must be sexy... sexier than my wife... this is all about the body. Nice proportions, well sculpted, bla bla bla... It's got to be worth it, right?

Fail any of these rules and I don't get to cheat.

I guess I'll be an old bugger before a cute and hot girl hits on me. So my wife's safe.... until then.
Reply
#46
RE: Would you ever cheat in a relationship?
(May 30, 2013 at 8:10 am)littleendian Wrote:
(May 29, 2013 at 8:09 am)dazzn Wrote: only "contemporary" society condemns racism. get with it. morals are ultimately transitory.
Yes, our feeling of morality has changed over the ages, but I think there is an underlying principle that hasn't changed, which is to reduce the amount of suffering for a specific group of individuals (the "in-group", as opposed to the "out-group" which is all live that must serve to minimize the suffering or maximize the utililty of the "in-group").

At least from what I can see all that has changed over the ages is the definition of this in-group, not the concept of morality itself.

I disagree. anything goes morally, and without limit.
Reply
#47
RE: Would you ever cheat in a relationship?
Your disagreement seems to be based on your ass.

(May 28, 2013 at 10:55 am)dazzn Wrote: cheat away, it's perfectly normal.

It's about the same as it's ever been. Studies of blood tests on infants in the fifties were suppressed from the public due to the high percentage of babies who weren't fathered by the women's husband.
Reply
#48
RE: Would you ever cheat in a relationship?
(May 30, 2013 at 12:04 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: Your disagreement seems to be based on your ass.

(May 28, 2013 at 10:55 am)dazzn Wrote: cheat away, it's perfectly normal.

It's about the same as it's ever been. Studies of blood tests on infants in the fifties were suppressed from the public due to the high percentage of babies who weren't fathered by the women's husband.

and? anything goes in life.

(May 30, 2013 at 8:04 am)Aractus Wrote:
(May 29, 2013 at 8:09 am)dazzn Wrote: only "contemporary" society condemns racism. get with it. morals are ultimately transitory.
Yeah go and fuck yourself.

hmm.. so 100 years ago, racism was deemed wrong?
Reply
#49
RE: Would you ever cheat in a relationship?
(May 30, 2013 at 8:49 am)Creed of Heresy Wrote: ...Why do these threads always insist on making me wish a large portion of humanity would just go up in a mushroom cloud? >:/

Because you're a very angry spirit Heart
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Reply
#50
RE: Would you ever cheat in a relationship?
I, personally, am of the opinion that good morals are what happen when you don't try to make people believe bullshit claims, and that bad morals are what happen when you try to bring some kind of justification to what morality is.

Case in point: "Negros are inferior." This was a bullshit claim used to justify slavery, and thanks to genetics and studies of the human anatomy, we now know that claiming that any group of humans are inferior based on mere skin color or eye color or hair color is totally in error. Racism was morally accepted because people started trying to create a morally-accepted reason for why slavery was OK.

Take away bullshit claims, and you take away immorality.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Happy birthday Gawdzilla where ever you are. arewethereyet 6 781 January 12, 2024 at 9:25 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  Would you still cook if you diddn't have to? Angrboda 41 3345 October 30, 2023 at 3:40 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Have you ever Met-up with an online Buddy? Uberpod 25 1992 December 3, 2022 at 10:33 pm
Last Post: Orbit
  Where would you go if you could? Brian37 24 2741 August 18, 2021 at 6:56 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  How high have you ever been? Frank Apisa 27 3044 June 28, 2021 at 10:44 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  The WORST Advice Someone Ever Gave You BrianSoddingBoru4 11 1510 April 14, 2019 at 2:12 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  Who would you rely on to help you out? Cod 18 1906 January 8, 2019 at 6:36 am
Last Post: Little lunch
  I've been there, "Have you ever"? Brian37 19 2319 November 16, 2018 at 8:34 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  Ever feel like you don't belong in this world? Silver 44 6210 April 3, 2018 at 5:48 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  Is it normal be a hetro-sexual and having no relationship experience? Sterben 61 8361 March 10, 2018 at 12:28 pm
Last Post: Shell B



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)