Posts: 2082
Threads: 72
Joined: March 12, 2013
Reputation:
44
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
August 27, 2013 at 3:20 pm
(August 27, 2013 at 8:51 am)Sword of Christ Wrote: (August 27, 2013 at 12:55 pm)Texas Sailor Wrote: Part of believing in God is knowing a basic rule required to be followed by all who believe:
1. God just is. He is all. His existence is immune to the inquiry of origin. His abilities and attributes are immune to logical laws.
Once convinced of this, they think the following to be quite obvious,and in fact feel quite confident in fabricating the following...
2. God is the origin of all things. Logical laws are prescribed by him. No ability or attribute held by God can be rationally understood by man.
The third rule is excersised quite frequently here, which is:
Any objection to rule 2, refer to rule 1.
God doesn't have an origin, I keep having to repeat this point for some reason. We object to that, you refer us to rule 1. First 3 words were?
Thanks for proving my point.
Posts: 1424
Threads: 65
Joined: February 11, 2013
Reputation:
26
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
August 27, 2013 at 3:26 pm
(This post was last modified: August 27, 2013 at 3:27 pm by CleanShavenJesus.)
(August 27, 2013 at 2:41 pm)Sword of Christ Wrote: (August 27, 2013 at 12:55 pm)Texas Sailor Wrote: Part of believing in God is knowing a basic rule required to be followed by all who believe:
1. God just is. He is all. His existence is immune to the inquiry of origin. His abilities and attributes are immune to logical laws.
Once convinced of this, they think the following to be quite obvious,and in fact feel quite confident in fabricating the following...
2. God is the origin of all things. Logical laws are prescribed by him. No ability or attribute held by God can be rationally understood by man.
The third rule is excersised quite frequently here, which is:
Any objection to rule 2, refer to rule 1.
God doesn't have an origin, I keep having to repeat this point for some reason.
Quote:"Why can't the universe not have an origin?"
1) The universe began to exist
2) If there are physical laws that created the BB they all began to exist effected by a cause as well
3) You have to start the ball rolling from somewhere else the ball would never roll
4) You need an explanation for anything/everything that exists that begins to exist
Honestly, are you reading back everything you type before you submit it? Why is it that the universe must have a beginning, but God is allowed to have always exsted?
You keep saying it's impossible for the universe to just be. You want a beginning to it. But it's possible for God to just be? There's no beginning of/for him? On what grounds can you say this? Why doesn't God have to follow the four "laws" you put out for the universe?
ronedee Wrote:Science doesn't have a good explaination for water
Posts: 1108
Threads: 33
Joined: June 4, 2013
Reputation:
18
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
August 27, 2013 at 3:37 pm
Fucking spirits, claiming to avoid the perils of reality but still managing to influence the big bang...
Posts: 905
Threads: 2
Joined: August 22, 2013
Reputation:
1
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
August 27, 2013 at 3:48 pm
(August 27, 2013 at 3:26 pm)CleanShavenJesus Wrote: You keep saying it's impossible for the universe to just be.
The universe began, everything exist and is physical began. Everything that begins is caused by something that made it begin. So it can't just be nothing can just be if it was made by something else that's the point. What you're suggesting isn't logical or practical.
Quote:You want a beginning to it.
EVERYTHING that physically exists ANYWHERE that ever came into existence had a BEGINNING there are NO exceptions. None. Ever.
Quote:But it's possible for God to just be?
Yes because God doesn't physically exist and nothing made him begin to exist, he is the cause and everything else is an effect from a cause. It's not just me asserting this as my own opinion this is deduction. This is what we can know. You don't take this on faith you take this as logic.
Quote:There's no beginning of/for him? On what grounds can you say this?
You can't have an effect, of an effect, of an effect, of an effect, of an effect, of an effect, of an effect etc forever because each effect would have been produced by an infinite number of other effects but no effect would ever have been produced to start with if it took an infinity of things to happen in order to get to whatever it was that did happen. There can only be a finite number of effects and everything has to start from one cause. This cause is God.
Quote:Why doesn't God have to follow the four "laws" you put out for the universe?
God made the four laws to begin with, he is the cause of everything that exists including all the physical laws.
Come all ye faithful joyful and triumphant.
Posts: 35429
Threads: 1439
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
August 27, 2013 at 3:50 pm
(August 27, 2013 at 3:48 pm)Sword of Christ Wrote: EVERYTHING that physically exists ANYWHERE that ever came into existence had a BEGINNING there are NO exceptions. None. Ever.
Then what was your god's beginning? No exceptions, remember.
"What a little moonlight can do." ~ Billie Holiday
Posts: 13900
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
August 27, 2013 at 3:54 pm
(August 27, 2013 at 3:48 pm)Sword of Christ Wrote: because God doesn't physically exist
You know what else doesn't "physically exist"....... non-existent things.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 31905
Threads: 205
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
August 27, 2013 at 3:54 pm
Is it just me or does this guy resemble jstrodel, with less spittle?
Posts: 905
Threads: 2
Joined: August 22, 2013
Reputation:
1
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
August 27, 2013 at 3:54 pm
(August 27, 2013 at 3:50 pm)Maelstrom Wrote: Then what was your god's beginning? No exceptions, remember.
God is the cause of all things that begin to exist not the exception. Unless you're saying nothing caused everything to exist? But then nothing would exist would it? Think about this one.
Come all ye faithful joyful and triumphant.
Posts: 35429
Threads: 1439
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
August 27, 2013 at 3:55 pm
(August 27, 2013 at 3:54 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Is it just me or does this guy resemble jstrodel, with less spittle?
I was thinking the same thing, but I did not mention it because I am usually wrong about everything I assume in terms of who could be who.
"What a little moonlight can do." ~ Billie Holiday
Posts: 31905
Threads: 205
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Attn: Theists - What would it take to prove you wrong?
August 27, 2013 at 3:55 pm
|