Posts: 18503
Threads: 79
Joined: May 29, 2010
Reputation:
125
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 14, 2013 at 5:24 am
(August 13, 2013 at 9:52 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: LOLWUT?
You are apparently not aware that water is apparently the most common compound in the universe.
That being the case, it's fairly unsurprising that you'd find a metric asston of it pretty much anywhere where it can exist in solid or liquid form.
One must be carefull with water, it makes stuff rust. OTOH, if the most common compound on the universe were beer, mabe then I'd consider the hyphothesis that a god could exist
Posts: 1155
Threads: 25
Joined: October 8, 2012
Reputation:
10
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 14, 2013 at 11:01 am
(August 13, 2013 at 9:52 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: (August 13, 2013 at 6:03 pm)ronedee Wrote: Science doesn't have a good explaination for water
LOLWUT?
You are apparently not aware that water is apparently the most common compound in the universe.
That being the case, it's fairly unsurprising that you'd find a metric asston of it pretty much anywhere where it can exist in solid or liquid form.
WRONG!
Quis ut Deus?
Posts: 1601
Threads: 2
Joined: January 2, 2013
Reputation:
32
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 14, 2013 at 11:04 am
Holy SHIT you have enlightened us about water. Thank you for correcting our assumptions we pulled out of thin air and you so eloquently dismantled with logic, explanations, and research.
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 14, 2013 at 11:21 am
(August 14, 2013 at 11:01 am)ronedee Wrote: (August 13, 2013 at 9:52 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: LOLWUT?
You are apparently not aware that water is apparently the most common compound in the universe.
That being the case, it's fairly unsurprising that you'd find a metric asston of it pretty much anywhere where it can exist in solid or liquid form.
WRONG!
Perhaps you'd care to elaborate? Wait, you're not one if those idiots that think water is found only on Earth, are you?
Posts: 174
Threads: 6
Joined: July 14, 2013
Reputation:
11
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 14, 2013 at 11:26 am
(August 14, 2013 at 11:21 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: (August 14, 2013 at 11:01 am)ronedee Wrote: WRONG!
Perhaps you'd care to elaborate? Wait, you're not one if those idiots that think water is found only on Earth, are you?
Now you are being silly Cthulu. It's a proven fact that anything that is written in caps is true and needs no explanation.
FACT.
Any spelling mistakes are due to my godlessness!
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 14, 2013 at 11:31 am
(August 14, 2013 at 11:26 am)ITChick Wrote: (August 14, 2013 at 11:21 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Perhaps you'd care to elaborate? Wait, you're not one if those idiots that think water is found only on Earth, are you?
Now you are being silly Cthulu. It's a proven fact that anything that is written in caps is true and needs no explanation.
FACT.
WRONG!!1!!!11!
Hey, it works!
Posts: 10735
Threads: 15
Joined: September 9, 2011
Reputation:
119
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 14, 2013 at 12:14 pm
Water is what you get when hydrogen is oxidized.
Why do we still have to have creationist arguments with Catholics when there have been popes who have stated outright that acceptance of evolution is compatible with Catholicism?
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 14, 2013 at 1:30 pm
I'm curious as to what an "explantation" of water would entail. It's molecular structure? It's physical properties? What knowledge would be necessary for an explanation of water?
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 14, 2013 at 1:40 pm
(August 14, 2013 at 11:01 am)ronedee Wrote: (August 13, 2013 at 9:52 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: LOLWUT?
You are apparently not aware that water is apparently the most common compound in the universe.
That being the case, it's fairly unsurprising that you'd find a metric asston of it pretty much anywhere where it can exist in solid or liquid form.
WRONG!
Okay, I praised you in another thread, but now we're right back to fighting: Are you fucking kidding me with this shit? This is your answer?
However, I'm going to do something you apparently didn't feel the need to do, and I'm going to treat you as if you have some intellectual curiosity and mental acuity. Here's a water formation in space that's billions of times bigger than the Earth. Isn't that cool?
The other strange thing is that you'll disagree out of hand about the commonness of water, despite standing on a planet that's mostly water, using a body that's mostly water. Just saying.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 14, 2013 at 1:48 pm
(August 14, 2013 at 1:40 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Here's a water formation in space that's billions of times bigger than the Earth.
I came across that this morning while I was refreshing my memory about water in the universe.
This formation holds "140 trillion times the water in Earth's oceans".
Earth's oceans x 140,000,000,000,000.
Mind. Blown.
|