Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 18, 2024, 4:47 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
I'm a YEC. Challenge me.
#61
RE: I'm a YEC. Challenge me.
[Image: 163179745_d8e3766bba.jpg]
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply
#62
RE: I'm a YEC. Challenge me.
(October 2, 2013 at 6:19 pm)Beta Ray Bill Wrote:
(October 2, 2013 at 6:02 pm)catfish Wrote: So dumbass, do you even know what the implication of "replenish" entails?
Or do you just wish to sling insults and watch how fast I piss you off?

Tough guy, eh? Who cares?

If we're supposed to believe Genesis 1, why is the story completely different in Genesis 2? Why was there a need for a second creation story? It just shows that the Bible is just a collection of fantasies, there is no consistent truth in it. To follow its rules is like guiding your life by Grimm fairy tales. Reword their meanings all you want, but fantasy is just fantasy.

A true god would never let something that is totally unclear and severely debatable be his "word." If there really was a God, there wouldn't be tens of thousands of religions out there trying to identify him. It's just stupid.

In other words, you don't know what that entails. Damn stupid airheads... Undecided
Reply
#63
RE: I'm a YEC. Challenge me.
Instead of spitting out stale insults, why don't you tell me what that entails? I'm all ears!
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.”
- Buddha
"Anyone wanting to believe Jesus lived and walked as a real live human being must do so despite the evidence, not because of it."
- Dennis McKinsey
Reply
#64
RE: I'm a YEC. Challenge me.
(October 2, 2013 at 6:08 pm)Brian37 Wrote:
(October 2, 2013 at 6:02 pm)catfish Wrote: So dumbass, do you even know what the implication of "replenish" entails?
Or do you just wish to sling insults and watch how fast I piss you off?

Well then if we are "insulting" you, then a sure fire way to shut us up is with evidence. Getting pissed off at us picking on your sky daddy makes him not only look like he has a thin skin, but also makes him look like a selfish narcissist being more worried about what we call him than actual real human suffering. We picked on your sky daddy, and?

You choose the latter? Really?

I'd love to sling insults back, but I'm afraid you wouldn't understand them.
Take your response to my post for instance. Did you even read what I said? You strawmanned the whole friggin rant for what? So that I can tell you how your reading comprehension has confused you?

Seriously man, you have sky-daddy issues, I see the pattern.
Reply
#65
RE: I'm a YEC. Challenge me.
No, JeffB, I challange you.



To Mortal Kombat.




[Image: h75B6935C]
Reply
#66
RE: I'm a YEC. Challenge me.
(October 2, 2013 at 7:09 pm)Beta Ray Bill Wrote: Instead of spitting out stale insults, why don't you tell me what that entails? I'm all ears!

Dumbo, a fitting name.
Reply
#67
RE: I'm a YEC. Challenge me.
(October 2, 2013 at 7:14 pm)catfish Wrote:
(October 2, 2013 at 6:08 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Well then if we are "insulting" you, then a sure fire way to shut us up is with evidence. Getting pissed off at us picking on your sky daddy makes him not only look like he has a thin skin, but also makes him look like a selfish narcissist being more worried about what we call him than actual real human suffering. We picked on your sky daddy, and?

You choose the latter? Really?

I'd love to sling insults back, but I'm afraid you wouldn't understand them.
Take your response to my post for instance. Did you even read what I said? You strawmanned the whole friggin rant for what? So that I can tell you how your reading comprehension has confused you?

Seriously man, you have sky-daddy issues, I see the pattern.

The only "swoosh" that matters is the one you are not facing. You can "swoosh" insults "over my head" all you wish, I could give a fuck less. It still doesn't make invisible magical sky daddies real, not yours not any.

Yes I DO have sky daddy issues. Just like I would if you claimed the moon was made of cheese.
Reply
#68
RE: I'm a YEC. Challenge me.
(October 2, 2013 at 7:22 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Yes I DO have sky daddy issues. Just like I would if you claimed the moon was made of cheese.

I didn't make a sky-daddy claim, now did I?

How hard it for you to address what's said and not what you imagine?
Reply
#69
RE: I'm a YEC. Challenge me.
I decided some time ago that mounting challenges to YEC is pure futility. Since it is neither scientific nor rational, it is irrefutable.

Please note that 'irrefutable' doesn't mean 'true' - it simply means that any rational refutation offered will always be countered (ultimately) by the hoary platitude that God ways are mysterious. Bear in mind that this fall back position is neither a refutation of science nor a defense of creationism. It is nothing more than a confession of abysmal ignorance about the way the world wags and what wags it.

If you accept that the Earth is on the close order of 10 000 years old, that all species are fixed and immutable, that agreements about the age of our planet in geology, chemistry, biology and astronomy are ALL wrong, that 99.9% of scientists are engaged in some nefarious anti-God conspiracy - all well and good, you've a right to believe whatever helps you sleep better at night. But to claim that YEC is on a par with legitimate science not only flies in the face of reason, it indicates a perverse and disturbing unwillingness to accept observed facts about the world as is.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#70
RE: I'm a YEC. Challenge me.
(October 2, 2013 at 7:16 pm)catfish Wrote:
(October 2, 2013 at 7:09 pm)Beta Ray Bill Wrote: Instead of spitting out stale insults, why don't you tell me what that entails? I'm all ears!

Dumbo, a fitting name.

Uh...yeah.

BTW: re·plen·ish

riˈpleniSH/

verb

1. fill (something) up again.

I don't think its only definition means "repopulate," which is the word I think you're shooting for.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.”
- Buddha
"Anyone wanting to believe Jesus lived and walked as a real live human being must do so despite the evidence, not because of it."
- Dennis McKinsey
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Christians vs Christians (yec) Fake Messiah 52 10354 January 31, 2019 at 2:08 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Wink Greetings,I commence open challenge to anyone Grehoman Ebenezer 148 31937 September 25, 2015 at 12:10 pm
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  The speed of light, stars, and YEC? Voltair 178 97094 September 24, 2015 at 7:38 am
Last Post: Iroscato
  A challenge to xtians persuade me dyresand 47 11991 September 4, 2015 at 11:27 am
Last Post: Drich
  Challenge regarding Christian morality robvalue 170 41237 February 16, 2015 at 10:17 am
Last Post: Tonus
  The REAL challenge Silver 32 7859 January 12, 2015 at 2:45 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Challenge: Name Even 10 Beliefs in the Christian Delusion which are NOT Ridiculous Whateverist 33 6421 December 21, 2014 at 12:38 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Question for Christians who are not YEC's Forsaken 16 4428 November 11, 2014 at 1:57 pm
Last Post: rexbeccarox
  Even Pat Robertson thinks YEC's are morons! SteelCurtain 10 3005 May 15, 2014 at 3:15 pm
Last Post: Tea Earl Grey Hot
  Challenge to atheists: I find your lack of faith disturbing! Aractus 271 84303 March 29, 2014 at 3:22 pm
Last Post: ThomM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)