Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2024, 11:39 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Problem of Evil and the Free Will Defense
#41
RE: The Problem of Evil and the Free Will Defense
(October 10, 2013 at 6:53 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Yes. That's from whence fallen angels come.

That sitll isn't sufficient, though, as it fails to address the true essence of the problem. The problem of evil is a problem because of the undue suffering it causes human nature, and the defense is the theist's attempt to reconcile its existencd with an omnipotent and benevolent god. If we are to differentiate between evil and "potential evil," as you call it, that doesn't explain why god sees fit to allow his creation to suffer when heaven is proof that it isn't necessary. Rather than reconcile the real issue, you've simply sidestepped it.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#42
RE: The Problem of Evil and the Free Will Defense
Quote:2. the idea of a world where everyone freely chooses not to do evil doesn't seem logically absurd. therefore it is possible for God to create free creatures without evil, therefore your argument is invalid.-- though this may seem like a reasonable objection, it fails to consider a few things. we aren't talking about a single variable, but a multitude of variables. if you considered a single person, you could come up with a multitude of experiences he has that allow him to choose what is good every time. however, this is just a single person experiencing things by himself. when you have a bunch of people, they often base their decisions off other people's decisions. if they see someone's choice, they may choose something different just because they want to see the outcome. so in a nutshell, it may be possible for a single person to freely choose good every time but not a large group of people yet alone the amount we have in our world. people who are able to choose differently will choose differently.

You've made a poor objection to an excellent point. We have consciences which, to a Christian, is the whispering voice of our moral core. Why did God choose to not make our conscience either much more persuasive or even impossible to ignore? It wouldn't violate free will any more or less than giving us the weaker consciences we already possess, because we already have obvious limits on our ability to exercise even the biblical idea of free will. I can't choose to hold my breath until I die, for one example.

The Christian free will argument is only an excuse for Christians to shift the blame from God to humans for all of the flaws in God's alleged creation, the same way some people blame rape victims by asserting that they are doing things that make them get raped, as if the rapist has no control over the situation.
Reply
#43
RE: The Problem of Evil and the Free Will Defense
(October 10, 2013 at 10:03 pm)Faith No More Wrote: that doesn't explain why god sees fit to allow his creation to suffer when heaven is proof that it isn't necessary.

Not to sound like a dick, but didn't my last post make any sense? Evil, the one thing heaven must be without, is something it needs to exist. Total nonsense.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.”
- Buddha
"Anyone wanting to believe Jesus lived and walked as a real live human being must do so despite the evidence, not because of it."
- Dennis McKinsey
Reply
#44
RE: The Problem of Evil and the Free Will Defense
(October 10, 2013 at 10:03 pm)Faith No More Wrote: The problem of evil is a problem because of the undue suffering it causes human nature, and the defense is the theist's attempt to reconcile its existencd with an omnipotent and benevolent god.
Doctor: You should stop smoking.
Patient: Why?
Doctor: Because it will give you cancer.
Patient: But I like smoking.
Doctor: It's a free country.

(10 years later)

Doctor: You have cancer.
Patient: Why couldn't you make me stop?
Doctor: Because, its a free country.
Reply
#45
RE: The Problem of Evil and the Free Will Defense
(October 10, 2013 at 7:20 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
Quote:Yes. That's from whence fallen angels come.

Seriously? Angels? Do you also believe in goblins, pookas, leprechauns, and the like?

Boru

Hey, now. What the hell do you have against pookas?

Them's fighting words.
Reply
#46
RE: The Problem of Evil and the Free Will Defense
(October 10, 2013 at 10:21 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Doctor: You should stop smoking.
Patient: Why?
Doctor: Because it will give you cancer.
Patient: But I like smoking.
Doctor: It's a free country.

(10 years later)

Doctor: You have cancer.
Patient: Why couldn't you make me stop?
Doctor: Because, its a free country.

I think it's almost my job to replace bad Christian analogies here with ones more appropriate to their beliefs.

God: You must eat food.
Human: Why?
God: Because you'll starve to death if you don't.
Human: But, my land is ravaged by famine and I am too poor to leave!
God: You have free will.

(10 days later)

God: Looks like you're dying of starvation.
Human: Why did you not give us food? We had nothing to eat and the bandits steal whatever we do find!
God: You had free will.
Reply
#47
RE: The Problem of Evil and the Free Will Defense
(October 10, 2013 at 1:55 am)max-greece Wrote: "3. if God is morally perfect, he wouldn't want evil in the world."

If this is a basic tenet of the argument then you cannot go on to define morality as:

"moral evil is the deliberate disobedience against God and his commandments."

This makes defining God as "morally perfect" a nonsense.

I'm going to have another go at this - because either I am missing something or I am not expressing myself very well:

There is nothing in the definition of moral perfection in the above to relate it to the concepts of good and evil.

If moral perfection is to follow God's commandments then those commandments could be good, or evil, or neither.

For example:

God issues a commandment not to eat pork.

There is nothing inherently evil about eating a pork chop as against a beef steak.

Or:

God instructs a man to sacrifice his son to him.

This is an inherently evil commandment and a totally pointless one. You cannot argue a "test of faith" case for an omniscient god. He already knew what the man would do.

We can conclude therefore that whether or not one follows God's morality is entirely independent of good and evil in an objective sense.

Therefore you can't even state:

"3. if God is morally perfect, he wouldn't want evil in the world."
Reply
#48
RE: The Problem of Evil and the Free Will Defense
Quote:Hey, now. What the hell do you have against pookas?

I have a pathological fear of all things horsey.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#49
RE: The Problem of Evil and the Free Will Defense
(October 11, 2013 at 3:54 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I have a pathological fear of all things horsey.

Accidentally walked in on a "Brony" convention once?
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
#50
RE: The Problem of Evil and the Free Will Defense
(October 9, 2013 at 10:44 am)Rational AKD Wrote: ...when I cover the subject of God, the nature of his omniscience and our free will.

While you're at it, can you cite me chapter and verse where this "free-will" thing appears in sacred scripture?

You strike me as one of those Cafeteria Christians who make up their own religion based half on cherry picked verses and half on their own imagination.
"You don't need facts when you got Jesus." -Pastor Deacon Fred, Landover Baptist Church

™: True Christian is a Trademark of the Landover Baptist Church. I have no affiliation with this fine group of True Christians ™ because I can't afford their tithing requirements but would like to be. Maybe someday the Lord will bless me with enough riches that I am able to. 

And for the lovers of Poe, here's your winking smiley:  Wink
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are cats evil beasts that should be killed to save mice? FlatAssembler 34 3574 November 28, 2022 at 11:41 am
Last Post: Fireball
  does evil exist? Quill01 51 5192 November 15, 2022 at 5:30 am
Last Post: h4ym4n
  In Defense of a Non-Natural Moral Order Acrobat 84 9607 August 30, 2019 at 3:02 pm
Last Post: LastPoet
  The argument against "evil", theists please come to the defense. Mystic 158 73045 December 29, 2017 at 7:21 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  One sentence that throws the problem of evil out of the window. Mystic 473 64072 November 12, 2017 at 7:57 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Reasoning showing homosexuality is evil. Mystic 315 56863 October 23, 2017 at 12:34 pm
Last Post: Silver
  Reasoning showing that heterosexuality is evil I_am_not_mafia 21 5463 October 23, 2017 at 8:23 am
Last Post: ignoramus
Wink Emoticons are Intrinsically Good and Evil Fireball 4 1334 October 21, 2017 at 12:11 am
Last Post: Succubus
  WLC, Free Will, and God's divine foreknowledge SuperSentient 15 3277 April 1, 2017 at 2:50 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Is knowledge the root of all evil? Won2blv 22 6666 February 18, 2017 at 7:56 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)