Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 3, 2024, 12:17 am

Poll: Guns Everywhere
This poll is closed.
I Support this Bill
16.67%
5 16.67%
I Oppose this Bill
83.33%
25 83.33%
Total 30 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
OMG Guns Everywhere
#91
RE: OMG Guns Everywhere
(May 10, 2014 at 11:14 pm)Chas Wrote:
(May 10, 2014 at 10:35 pm)Coffee Jesus Wrote: Guns are still worse.

Not always. A small caliber handgun is less likely to inflict a fatal wound than an eight-inch hunting knife.

According to who??

(May 12, 2014 at 4:48 pm)KUSA Wrote:
(May 12, 2014 at 3:17 pm)abtaylor Wrote: Pistols, Machine Guns, all the kinds, theyre all legal

As they should be. It's a right you know?

In your country may be.

What I find truly staggering is, that by allowing this "open carry" law, the local governments are basically admitting that they have no control over local law enforcement.

Your government cannot do their most basic of remits, to protect you. The worst of it is that because you get to carry a gun and feel like a cowboy in the wild west, some of you seem to have totally missed the point.

You've gone back nearly 200 years, but you get to carry a gun.
Reply
#92
RE: OMG Guns Everywhere
(May 13, 2014 at 9:21 am)Hoopington Wrote:
(May 10, 2014 at 11:14 pm)Chas Wrote: Not always. A small caliber handgun is less likely to inflict a fatal wound than an eight-inch hunting knife.

According to who??

According to me. I have experience with the effects of both.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
#93
RE: OMG Guns Everywhere
(May 13, 2014 at 3:16 pm)Chas Wrote:
(May 13, 2014 at 9:21 am)Hoopington Wrote: According to who??

According to me. I have experience with the effects of both.

As do I, and I call bollocks.
Reply
#94
RE: OMG Guns Everywhere
(May 14, 2014 at 4:17 am)Hoopington Wrote:
(May 13, 2014 at 3:16 pm)Chas Wrote: According to me. I have experience with the effects of both.

As do I, and I call bollocks.

I'd say it depends. I personally have been shot with a 22 long rifle and the damage to my leg was less than you would expect a stabbing with a hunting knife assuming a "to the hilt" thrust. but as the bullet hit bone and deflected to the inside, a knife might have just stopped, doing even less damage. So even in my personal experience I'd still have to say it depends on the particulars.
Find the cure for Fundementia!
Reply
#95
Re: RE: OMG Guns Everywhere
(May 13, 2014 at 9:21 am)Hoopington Wrote: Your government cannot do their most basic of remits, to protect you.

My government protect me? Unless the cop to civilian ratio is one to one and I have coverage by them 24/7 its never going to happen.

Besides the supreme court ruled that the police do not have a constitutional duty to protect anyone.

I protect myself. Always have always will.
Reply
#96
RE: OMG Guns Everywhere
(May 14, 2014 at 4:44 pm)KUSA Wrote: Besides the supreme court ruled that the police do not have a constitutional duty to protect anyone.

It's still their job. If you don't do your job, you get fired.
Reply
#97
RE: OMG Guns Everywhere
Obviously you've never read up on the case that resulted in that particular decision.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
[Image: JUkLw58.gif]
Reply
#98
RE: OMG Guns Everywhere
(May 14, 2014 at 6:10 pm)Coffee Jesus Wrote:
(May 14, 2014 at 4:44 pm)KUSA Wrote: Besides the supreme court ruled that the police do not have a constitutional duty to protect anyone.

It's still their job. If you don't do your job, you get fired.

No, it's not their job. That's what the SCOTUS decision means.

(May 14, 2014 at 4:17 am)Hoopington Wrote:
(May 13, 2014 at 3:16 pm)Chas Wrote: According to me. I have experience with the effects of both.

As do I, and I call bollocks.

Anywhere on the body a .22LR can kill you, an 8" blade will, too. Not vice versa.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
#99
RE: OMG Guns Everywhere
(May 14, 2014 at 6:27 pm)Chas Wrote: Anywhere on the body a .22LR can kill you, an 8" blade will, too. Not vice versa.

Perhaps, but an 8" blade is harmless from any distance greater than about four feet from the wielder. I think this consideration makes your claim insignificant.
Reply
RE: OMG Guns Everywhere
(May 14, 2014 at 7:11 pm)Cato Wrote:
(May 14, 2014 at 6:27 pm)Chas Wrote: Anywhere on the body a .22LR can kill you, an 8" blade will, too. Not vice versa.

Perhaps, but an 8" blade is harmless from any distance greater than about four feet from the wielder. I think this consideration makes your claim insignificant.

Farther than that. An attacker can close a distance of 21 ft. in 1.5 sec. - the time it takes to draw a firearm and fire two shots.

This is known as "The 21-foot Rule". However, the latest analysis says that it should be an even greater distance.

Quote:Research by Dr. Bill Lewinski of The Force Science Research Center and Dr. Marvin Fackler has repeatedly shown that officer reaction times are significantly longer than commonly believed.

Now consider that the officers on the Calibre tape knew where the suspect was, what he was armed with, and that he was about to charge. On the tape, the suspect begins to move and the officer begins to draw. That eliminates the real-world delays of perceiving the threat and then making the decision to defend with gunfire.

The Force Science Research Center has shown that it takes the average officer about half a second to perceive a threat and approximately another half second to decide what to do about it. All of this has to happen before the officer begins his or her draw stroke. What this means is that with the threat closing at seven feet per half second, we are closer to a 35-foot rule.

And it is extremely difficult to smoothly draw and accurately fire when under a life-threatening attack. So that means that we had better add another 10 feet to allow for the attacker to keep coming if we miss center mass or even if we hit him, even mortally wound him, and he doesn't go down.

It's now the 45-foot rule.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Man Arrested for owning guns. onlinebiker 133 7181 July 26, 2021 at 5:04 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Of guns and fireworks OP/ED....... Brian37 22 1292 July 9, 2021 at 12:46 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Guns banned in Michigan State Capitol. onlinebiker 52 3023 January 13, 2021 at 7:37 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Lets hand out guns like candy. Kenosha edition. Brian37 15 696 August 27, 2020 at 9:10 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Guns Sales Booming onlinebiker 41 2827 June 22, 2020 at 7:09 am
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Guns and suicide onlinebiker 51 4431 August 9, 2019 at 10:17 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  [split] What is next for the United States? [GUNS] Brian37 104 7025 May 15, 2019 at 9:24 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  America is introducing 3D-printed guns now Alexmahone 29 2723 August 1, 2018 at 8:06 pm
Last Post: TaraJo
  Walmart raises minimum age requirement for buying Guns and Ammo Sterben 15 1734 March 2, 2018 at 9:42 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Donald Trump wants to arm teachers with guns possibletarian 251 21644 February 26, 2018 at 10:30 pm
Last Post: Fireball



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)