By suing the victim, she is attempting to shift the responsibility of blame away from herself. She must be Christian.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
~ Erin Hunter
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 26, 2024, 3:46 am
Thread Rating:
|
Woman Runs over a Kid, Sues the Kid's Family
|
 (April 27, 2014 at 1:08 am)Deidre32 Wrote: Sometimes, I wish there really did exist a place called hell. Nah, no hell, just run them over or run them over and sue them for more money. In all seriousness, the family should counter-sue that woman for a fraudulent case.
If the hypothetical idea of an afterlife means more to you than the objectively true reality we all share, then you deserve no respect.
I imagine she has a sleazebag lawyer who suggested a countersuit.
 (April 27, 2014 at 10:28 am)Kitanetos Wrote: By suing the victim, she is attempting to shift the responsibility of blame away from herself. She must be Christian. From what I'm understanding, she's suing as a response to being sued, which kind of makes sense. Her defense could be all kinds of things; the teenagers were being dicks and playing Chicken with her, the teenagers came out of nowhere on the dark road, etc. If she doesn't feel she's at fault for the accident, she sort of has to sue. It's tragic, but it's the nature of the justice system.  RE: Woman Runs over a Kid, Sues the Kid's Family
April 27, 2014 at 3:34 pm
(This post was last modified: April 27, 2014 at 3:35 pm by *Deidre*.)
True, but she's suing for 'mental anguish,' etc. I get it, but give me a break. She's still living. The kid she hit isn't.
She can counter sue to protect her assets, I get that, too. But, suing for her mental anguish is trying to profit off someone's loss. That's what is disgusting. No doubt she has mental anguish, but somehow, I think the mother and father who lost their child, are suffering worse.
She doesn't have physical injuries. She almost has to claim mental issues. This is just lawyer games.
Well killing someone can be traumatizing. No doubt about that. Sueing the family, though. This reminds me of a story about a guy that broke into a house, hurt himself with a knife, and sued the owners for the injury. I'm just not sure how things like this are possible.
Poe's Law: "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of Fundamentalism that SOMEONE won't mistake for the real thing."
10 Christ-like figures that predate Jesus. Link shortened to Chris ate Jesus for some reason... http://listverse.com/2009/04/13/10-chris...ate-jesus/ Good video to watch, if you want to know how common the Jesus story really is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88GTUXvp-50 A list of biblical contradictions from the infallible word of Yahweh. http://infidels.org/library/modern/jim_m...tions.html (April 27, 2014 at 3:34 pm)Deidre32 Wrote: True, but she's suing for 'mental anguish,' etc. I get it, but give me a break. She's still living. The kid she hit isn't. Yeah, it's complete bullshit to counter-sue for mental anguish because you hit someone. But we have a bullshit justice system, so, she could win.
If the hypothetical idea of an afterlife means more to you than the objectively true reality we all share, then you deserve no respect.
What strikes me as the worst part, though, is that her husband, a cop, was following her in another car at the time of the accident. She was speeding, alleged to be on her cell phone, and alleged to have been drinking. But her husband the cop took her home with no breathalyzer, no citation.
The family of the boy is suing her, her husband, and the county to the total of 900k.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---  (April 27, 2014 at 4:16 am)Losty Wrote:(April 27, 2014 at 3:10 am)psychoslice Wrote: Parents need to know where their children are, 24/7, if they don't they don't deserve to have child and should be sued. Ahh, bite my arss |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
