An unorthodox belief in God.

[Ravenshire]

maybe I can use some pages I wrote else where; Let me see if this works.

http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/genera...l-113.html

Okay it worked; not that I am lazy, but consider this page of reasoned evidence; and we can go through each one individually as you wish.
And this is my work. Not someonelse.

Argument from authority. Color my seriously unimpressed!

[mickiel]

That's one of them, yes. One on a long list that no animal could ever even fulfill 1/10th of.

Again, predictable. You appear to be completely unaware of the research in this field.

I think I am unaware of some of it, yes, but know enough of it.

---

maybe I can use some pages I wrote else where; Let me see if this works.

http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/genera...l-113.html

Okay it worked; not that I am lazy, but consider this page of reasoned evidence; and we can go through each one individually as you wish.
And this is my work. Not someonelse.

Argument from authority. Color my seriously unimpressed!

What's it feel like when you have to hide?

[Jackalope]

Again, predictable. You appear to be completely unaware of the research in this field.

I think I am unaware of some of it, yes, but know enough of it.

Your posts indicate otherwise.

[Ravenshire]

Oh no I understand why you reject it, you're supposed to. Its you're time to reject it; where I differ with Christianity, is that rejection is meaningless to god, because he has you rejecting him. He wants you there, thus that rejection is NOT condemnation for you; its karma; its position; its destiny. I do not view atheism as evil, nor as a thing from the devil. NO! I see god as its source, as he is the source of theism as well.

Just curious. Do you believe in free will?

[SteelCurtain]

What's it feel like when you have to hide?

I know! Logic and reason are so ridiculous to hide behind when you fallacious arguments and bare assertions to guide you!

[Ravenshire]

Oh I did, for two pages, just not to you're satisfaction; its impossible to satisfy atheist cynicism.

Actually, it's quite easy. Testable, verifiable evidence. Not logical arguments that stand or fall, not on their logic, but their presupposition. Not bare-assed, unsupported assertions.

I gave the evidence, you reject it or say its too much or not magnified enough. You pick one, others here have tried that, " Focus on one " as an excuse; it does not work. But I will still do that with any of you.

Yet again, your evidence isn't being rejected because you haven't presented any.

[mickiel]

Oh no I understand why you reject it, you're supposed to. Its you're time to reject it; where I differ with Christianity, is that rejection is meaningless to god, because he has you rejecting him. He wants you there, thus that rejection is NOT condemnation for you; its karma; its position; its destiny. I do not view atheism as evil, nor as a thing from the devil. NO! I see god as its source, as he is the source of theism as well.

Just curious. Do you believe in free will?

No I don't. I think we have limited will, but free will, in my view, is a will not influenced by any outside influences, and I think that's impossible. Its not biblical either.

---

Oh I did, for two pages, just not to you're satisfaction; its impossible to satisfy atheist cynicism.

Actually, it's quite easy. Testable, verifiable evidence. Not logical arguments that stand or fall, not on their logic, but their presupposition. Not bare-assed, unsupported assertions.

I gave the evidence, you reject it or say its too much or not magnified enough. You pick one, others here have tried that, " Focus on one " as an excuse; it does not work. But I will still do that with any of you.

Yet again, your evidence isn't being rejected because you haven't presented any.

Once again:
http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/genera...l-113.html

[Ravenshire]

It's more likely that Humans were well suited for the Earth, and so developed and evolved within its tolerances.

Its both!

No, it's not. One is the real case, and has lots of evidence to support it. The other is an illusion. If you ever did any actual research on evolution and/or biology you'd know the difference.

[mickiel]

Its both!

No, it's not. One is the real case, and has lots of evidence to support it. The other is an illusion. If you ever did any actual research on evolution and/or biology you'd know the difference.

I am tempted to give you my view of evolution, but it will only roll off you like water on a duck's back.

[Ravenshire]

No it does not; god gave himself consciousness; I just can't explain how.

[emphasis is mine]

An yet, in your arrogance, you expect us to blindly accept this claim while not even considering ours.

So, why can't the universe have created itself. After all, you're claiming that god created itself.

---

You sound like one of those mislead deists. That's a shame. The one TRUE God is not someone to take litely. You should get your heart right as quickly as you can. The Lord Jesus Christ will discard you as quickly as he does the atheists who deny him.

Got some evidence for that "One True Gawd" you're spouting about? Any at all?

Somehow I doubt it.

---

I totally disagree with ever last one of those who signed that declaration, they are an embarrassment to realist; elephants, chimps and octo's are not conscious beings. Their animals, beasts; nothing more.

I totally disagree with this shameful deception of professionals who signed that, they KNOW animals are not conscious.

And you piss and moan that your "evidence" is being rejected. Hypocrite!