Identifying the word of god

[Ben Davis]

I think that's the very first time I've heard a religious person say that, and I respect that a lot. Your view of religion and holy books certainly seems very different to the norm, and it seems far better to me.

Michael's perspective is very representative of Christianity in the UK. Enlightenment values and secular organisation of society have left a lasting impact on religious expression.

[DramaQueen]

The real book of god was buried by nazi communists in central park, NYC.

[Michael]

I think that's the very first time I've heard a religious person say that, and I respect that a lot. Your view of religion and holy books certainly seems very different to the norm, and it seems far better to me.

Michael's perspective is very representative of Christianity in the UK. Enlightenment values and secular organisation of society have left a lasting impact on religious expression.

Hey Ben. Did you have to burst the bubble so soon? There I was, basking in the idea that I was somehow special. And then you come along and blow the gaff by letting everyone know that actually I'm just extraordinarily ordinary in UK Christianity.

(-p

[ShaMan]

When is it [god], and when is it our own preferences?

I have a few Christian friends. One in particular has an annoying habit of believing that whenever things are going as he wants that god is with him and whenever things are going against him that the devil is responsible. An example would be when he lost his wallet. He said that the 'enemy' was trying to rob his joy, and that satan didn't want him to be able to go on a road-trip, and so his wallet containing his license, credit cards and cash was stolen to prevent him from going. Well, well, well... he found his 'stolen' wallet exactly where HE left it and took the trip, and wouldn't you know it, god was once again 'with' him. Oh yeah, the trip was for a Christian rally concert where the admission for receiving god's goodness and teaching was available at the low, low price of $95 per person for a 4 hour event.
Seems to me like satan wanted him to go after all

[orangebox21]

Logical consistency (both internal and between the two texts)
Textual Criticism
Historicity
Testimony
Personal experience

More information on your question could be explored here namely post #21 to begin. The question is a bit different but there are some similarities in the content.

As I was considering your question, I was wondering if the question is answerable? In your proposition, 'given two texts, one authentic and one counterfeit', you ask: how do we know the counterfeit from the authentic? To answer this we would need a standard with which to measure the two against. The standard in this proposition would be the word of God, but that is the very item in question. How would you propose determining the standard itself? Let me ask this another way. I hand you two $1 bills, one is authentic and one is counterfeit. Given only those two bills, how would you determine which one is fake?

[The Grand Nudger]

Your example is representative neither of reality, or of the subject to which you wish to draw an analogy.

[ronwilliams]

Nobady can see the word of god but everyone having imagination power. People draw the images in which god is present only to imagine the god word. Every people having imagination power but no body can use this power in same manner. For example you can pick a general topic in your daily family and share it with your family member or friends they can understand their topic and provide different different option to over come with your situation, that's because they have mind but they used differently. Every people having different opinion for god's.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Nobady can see the word of god but everyone having imagination power. People draw the images in which god is present only to imagine the god word. Every people having imagination power but no body can use this power in same manner. For example you can pick a general topic in your daily family and share it with your family member or friends they can understand their topic and provide different different option to over come with your situation, that's because they have mind but they used differently. Every people having different opinion for god's.

[robvalue]

As I was considering your question, I was wondering if the question is answerable? In your proposition, 'given two texts, one authentic and one counterfeit', you ask: how do we know the counterfeit from the authentic? To answer this we would need a standard with which to measure the two against. The standard in this proposition would be the word of God, but that is the very item in question. How would you propose determining the standard itself?

That is pretty much the thought process I was trying to get at In my opinion the question is not answerable, and that is the point. It's the process you would use that is important, and how that applies to the real situation we have in religion. Take away the assumption that any of them are in fact the word of god for sure, and you are there. We don't have a word of god to compare to, because you have to assume something is the word of god in order to "prove" that it is, by comparing it with itself- which makes no sense.

If the word of god is "self evident", then it should still be so even if you had all memory of what you know about the book removed from your brain first, so even the names wouldn't mean anything to you. Hence my example.

[jughead]