Posts: 116
Threads: 0
Joined: October 17, 2014
Reputation:
0
RE: There are two misstakes in the title of this thread.
October 18, 2014 at 1:26 pm
Mistake is spelled incorrectly.
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
151
RE: There are two misstakes in the title of this thread.
October 18, 2014 at 1:29 pm
True. Then is there only one mistake?
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
151
RE: There are two misstakes in the title of this thread.
October 18, 2014 at 1:40 pm
Oh logic, you are a cruel and faithless temptress.
Posts: 6856
Threads: 50
Joined: September 14, 2014
Reputation:
44
RE: There are two misstakes in the title of this thread.
October 18, 2014 at 1:43 pm
(This post was last modified: October 18, 2014 at 1:46 pm by Aoi Magi.)
nope, there is only one "misstake" in the title.
It didn't claim to have two mistakes, it claimed to have two "misstakes" which it doesn't so it isn't true...
misstake!=mistake
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu
Join me on atheistforums
Slack (pester tibs via pm if you need invite)
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
151
RE: There are two misstakes in the title of this thread.
October 18, 2014 at 1:48 pm
(This post was last modified: October 18, 2014 at 1:53 pm by Whateverist.)
You're welcome. =)
Good point. Are intentional mistakes even a coherent possibility? The Navahos apparently thought so. I've heard their artisans would deliberately make a mistake in a weaving in order to show humility toward their gods.
If we allow that the miscount of mistakes makes the title true, would its being true therefore nullify the attribution of the second mistake? I want to say no. It is true because there is one, not two, mistakes. And its being true does not change that.
Posts: 116
Threads: 0
Joined: October 17, 2014
Reputation:
0
RE: There are two misstakes in the title of this thread.
October 18, 2014 at 2:52 pm
I've decided you suck, whateverist. :-)
I'm sticking with intentional. Navahos included flaws, rather than made mistakes.
If the count and misspelling were both mistakes, the statement is necessarily true, even if by mistake. Any other solution and the statement is false.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: There are two misstakes in the title of this thread.
October 18, 2014 at 5:37 pm
Ah self referential things... Now what about the barber who shaves anyone who doesn't shave themselves?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition