MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
|
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
|
 RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 6:43 pm
Quote:The entire genre of history is based on faith, Quote:History is the version of past events that people have decided to agree upon. And the biggest steaming turd is your religion.  RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 6:47 pm
(December 15, 2014 at 5:23 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(December 15, 2014 at 2:40 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: said the guy who made a positive claim about having settled the matter of Jesus's existence ... only to backtrack and say that it was his opinion. You realize that opinions aren't factual statements, right? Maybe this explains your suppurating threads spewing horseshit everywhere ... you've confused your opinion with fact. I don't need to support my lack of faith with evidence. If you wish to change my mind, you'll need to bring evidence, not this weaksauce bullshit, Speedbag.  RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 6:49 pm
a long long time ago...
on earth... man created religion... from religion man became ignorant.... only groups of non believers have the will to fight back.... the inquisitions and crusades are coming..... -Abrahmic Religion wars: Episode 1 the ignorance rising-
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe> RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 6:51 pm
(December 15, 2014 at 6:47 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote:(December 15, 2014 at 5:23 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: Five or six posts later, and you still can't give me any evidence to back up the claim that "God didn't do anything"...instead of giving me what I asked for, I am getting continual rhetoric. At this point it's starting to remind me of a dog chasing its tail.
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 6:55 pm
![[Image: where-knowledge-ends-religion-begins-9.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.quotesvalley.com%2Fimages%2F21%2Fwhere-knowledge-ends-religion-begins-9.jpg)
 RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 6:59 pm
It seems that there are always certain believers (H_M appears to be one) who are so insecure in their faith that they require the patina of intellectual respectability as well. It's not enough for them to simply believe; they want to convince others that they aren't morons for believing as they do. Since they cannot demonstrate the truth of their silly beliefs (despite their posturing to the contrary), their only recourse is to try to drag down other disciplines -- scientific and historical -- to their own wretched level. Equivocating the word "faith" is one of the tools in their arsenal. What I've never been able to figure out when it comes to such people is whether they are supremely stupid or cynical.
However, I've never been in doubt that they are a complete waste of time. I salute those with the patience to deal with this nonsense, if only for the sake of the lurkers, but I lack the stomach for it. Laughter -- and lots of it! -- is my response. After all, that's what clowns are for. RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 7:06 pm
Quote: who are so insecure in their faith that they require the patina of intellectual respectability as well. Shame, then, that he comes across as a total shithead isn't it?  RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 7:08 pm
(This post was last modified: December 15, 2014 at 7:11 pm by Strider.)
(December 15, 2014 at 6:59 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: What I've never been able to figure out when it comes to such people is whether they are supremely stupid or cynical.If I were a betting man, I'd have to go with the former. You can also add desperate to that mix. They interpret information in a way (even if it is an ass-backwards way) that forces it to agree with their dogma even if in reality it doesn't. If it can't be twisted enough to jive with their beliefs, it's rejected out of hand.
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid." ~ Benjamin Franklin
 RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 7:11 pm
(This post was last modified: December 15, 2014 at 7:12 pm by pocaracas.)
 RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 15, 2014 at 7:18 pm
(December 15, 2014 at 7:11 pm)pocaracas Wrote:(December 14, 2014 at 7:51 pm)pocaracas Wrote: ![[Image: 200_s.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=media2.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FPxfJk0LKktjdS%2F200_s.gif)
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
