Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 4, 2024, 6:54 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 1:36 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: I will ask again, if you negate the existence of God, how is naturalism not the default position?

So, if you found a lost tribe in the Amazon or in New Guinea that had never encountered other people, would you classify them as naturalists if they didn't carry bibles? They may be naturalists in the higher sense of wearing no cloths but would they have to have a full blown theory of 'nature' as the cause of it all?

Sometimes I think you missionaries believe that everyone must have a preoccupation akin to your own with god. That isn't necessarily true. Just because I don't have a theory of everything like your GodDidIt theory doesn't mean I must have some other theory. Maybe I just don't give a damn about primary causes and movers.

It isn't really a necessary component of a modern mindset and more often is a compliment to a medieval one.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
So-called "primitive" tribes do not waste their time building temples to inane gods. They have far more important things to do.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 1:42 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: I'd like to debate the Resurrection as a whole...the Gospels are just one part within the subject...which is why I tried to build a cumulative case for the Resurrection starting with Part 1, and then just build from there...but Fidel wanted to pull his God card and he kinda messed up that for me...and now you know how my case is build so the element of surprise won't be there, at least, for how I'd like it to be.

The whole staff messed it up for you, dude. We voted to merge your threads. We vote on lots of things. Stay tuned.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 1:42 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: I'd like to debate the Resurrection as a whole..

I'll bet you would. But you know your doctor doesn't think your lobes are ready for any heavy lifting yet. You should content yourself with stray ideas .. if you get any.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
I do not see a case being built, though. I just see a bunch of hooey.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 1:42 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: ...and now you know how my case is build so the element of surprise won't be there, at least, for how I'd like it to be.

I for one promise to act surprised but you'd be surprised how unoriginal this shit really is.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 2:02 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: The whole staff messed it up for you, dude. We voted to merge your threads. We vote on lots of things. Stay tuned.

I think the theists actually get to vote on cooler things. I mean, how cool would it be to be the one to say "The Ayes have it... Jesus was God"
Celebrate Reason ● Think For Yourself
www.theHeathensGuide.com
[Image: heathens-guide.png]
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
The fucking muslims would demand a recount.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
is there an absentee ballot for those whose entrails are scattered across the front of a synagogue?
Celebrate Reason ● Think For Yourself
www.theHeathensGuide.com
[Image: heathens-guide.png]
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 2:06 pm)JonDarbyXIII Wrote:
(December 16, 2014 at 2:02 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: The whole staff messed it up for you, dude. We voted to merge your threads. We vote on lots of things. Stay tuned.

I think the theists actually get to vote on cooler things. I mean, how cool would it be to be the one to say "The Ayes have it... Jesus was God"

The sad thing is that this is actually pretty close to how they decided that Jesus was divine. Another reason I'm not a Christian anymore. Reality isn't a matter of what the majority decides.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  To Atheists: Who, in your opinion, was Jesus Christ? JJoseph 52 2754 June 12, 2024 at 11:01 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The power of Christ... zwanzig 60 4882 August 30, 2023 at 8:33 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Jesus Christ is the Beast 666 Satan Emerald_Eyes_Esoteric 36 8297 December 18, 2022 at 10:33 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Creating Christ JML 26 3411 September 29, 2022 at 9:40 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  So has Christ returned TheClearCleanStuff 31 3524 May 20, 2022 at 12:35 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  CHRIST THE KICKER…… BrianSoddingBoru4 15 1526 January 3, 2022 at 10:00 am
Last Post: brewer
  CHRIST THE KILLER..... ronedee 31 3727 December 26, 2021 at 7:11 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
Rainbow Why I believe in Jesus Christ Ai Somoto 20 2939 June 30, 2021 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 16918 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Consecrated virgins: 'I got married to Christ' zebo-the-fat 11 2134 December 7, 2018 at 7:03 pm
Last Post: Angrboda



Users browsing this thread: 12 Guest(s)