Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 30, 2024, 2:36 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
So, has Jebus resurrected yet?
Dying to live, living to die.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 1:18 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: The Trinity is the doctrine that the Father, Son, and Holy spirit are three separate beings/persons, that share the same Deity of God....kinda like how you, jenny, and parkers are three separate persons, yet you all share the same nature..human nature.

Sweet Reason, not only do you provide no evidence, you don't even know what you're claiming.

The Trinity is more than just Jesus and Yahweh are both similar gods. The Trinity is the assertion that there is only ONE god. The reason Jesus can forgive sins and be the divine intercessor ("no one comes to the Father but by me") is because Jesus is God. And the reason Jesus prays "not my will but thy will be done" and "no one knows the day, not even the Son but the father only" is because Jesus is not God. Jesus is fully divine and fully human, fully part of God and yet fully independent from God, depending on the needs of the story at the time.

That you don't even know the theology you're defending, that I as a non-believer must explain Christianity to you, is probably the most pathetic part of this entire thread of yours.

And that's saying a lot.

(December 16, 2014 at 1:42 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: I'd like to debate the Resurrection as a whole...the Gospels are just one part within the subject...which is why I tried to build a cumulative case for the Resurrection starting with Part 1, and then just build from there...but Fidel wanted to pull his God card and he kinda messed up that for me...and now you know how my case is build so the element of surprise won't be there, at least, for how I'd like it to be.

Tell you what, I'll be generous.

Just tell me the story of the resurrection. You don't need to provide any proof that it happened. All you have to do is reconcile ALL FOUR GOSPEL ACCOUNTS with one another. You are not allowed to cherry pick. You are not allowed to omit anything. You are not allowed to contradict any part of the Gospels.

Tie it all together in one coherent, non-self-contradicting story and I'll be impressed.

(December 16, 2014 at 2:03 pm)whateverist Wrote:
(December 16, 2014 at 1:42 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: I'd like to debate the Resurrection as a whole..

I'll bet you would. But you know your doctor doesn't think your lobes are ready for any heavy lifting yet. You should content yourself with stray ideas .. if you get any.

That's why I invited him to take some baby steps.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 1:27 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: So basically, the Staff has the right to play God...got it.

Admin hat on.

Tiberius owns the site. He has empowered the rest of the staff to run the site according to a set of rules and principles that developed over the last six years.

If you have some constructive criticism for how the site is run, we have a forum for that here, and you're welcomed and encouraged to use it. Alternatively, you know the way out, I trust.

If you're just going to be a bomb-throwing antagonizer in discussion threads, stow it. It's disruptive, the staff won't stand for it, and it will not end well for you.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
Huh... turns out that some gods really do exist.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
Hopefully Majestic_Folly will suck it up and soldier on. Our souls aren't going to save themselves you know.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
After rereading post #1, I have to agree. I remain unconvinced.
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 3:08 pm)Spooky Wrote: After rereading post #1, I have to agree. I remain unconvinced.

On which page did you choose to reread post #1? You have many from which to choose.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 3:03 pm)whateverist Wrote: Hopefully Majestic_Folly will suck it up and soldier on. Our souls aren't going to save themselves you know.

After humiliating himself on this thread and failing to prove any of his claims, all he has left is to provoke a banning so he can claim persecution.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 3:11 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:
(December 16, 2014 at 3:03 pm)whateverist Wrote: Hopefully Majestic_Folly will suck it up and soldier on. Our souls aren't going to save themselves you know.

After humiliating himself on this thread and failing to prove any of his claims, all he has left is to provoke a banning so he can claim persecution.

This.

This is exactly what he will do.

He'll then run to various Christian sites and claim he was banned when the atheists couldn't answer his questions or dispute his "facts".

He's displayed dishonesty here, why would he do anything different on other sites?
Dying to live, living to die.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 2:57 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:
(December 16, 2014 at 1:27 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: So basically, the Staff has the right to play God...got it.

Admin hat on.

Tiberius owns the site. He has empowered the rest of the staff to run the site according to a set up rules and principles that developed over the last six years.

If you have some constructive criticism for how the site is run, we have a forum for that here, and you're welcome and encouraged to use it. Alternatively, you know the way out, I trust.

If you're just going to be a bomb-throwing antagonizer in discussion threads, stow it. It's disruptive, the staff won't stand for it, and it will not end well for you.

[Image: am8gfs.jpg]

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  To Atheists: Who, in your opinion, was Jesus Christ? JJoseph 50 2351 January 9, 2024 at 4:28 am
Last Post: no one
  The power of Christ... zwanzig 60 4640 August 30, 2023 at 8:33 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Jesus Christ is the Beast 666 Satan Emerald_Eyes_Esoteric 36 8098 December 18, 2022 at 10:33 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Creating Christ JML 26 3247 September 29, 2022 at 9:40 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  So has Christ returned TheClearCleanStuff 31 3442 May 20, 2022 at 12:35 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  CHRIST THE KICKER…… BrianSoddingBoru4 15 1486 January 3, 2022 at 10:00 am
Last Post: brewer
  CHRIST THE KILLER..... ronedee 31 3555 December 26, 2021 at 7:11 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
Rainbow Why I believe in Jesus Christ Ai Somoto 20 2863 June 30, 2021 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 16069 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Consecrated virgins: 'I got married to Christ' zebo-the-fat 11 2063 December 7, 2018 at 7:03 pm
Last Post: Angrboda



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)