Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 1:00 pm
(December 17, 2014 at 12:58 pm)Esquilax Wrote: (December 17, 2014 at 12:35 pm)pocaracas Wrote: *user hat on*
W-wait... if you only just now put your user hat on, how did you ever post here before now? If a mod hat indicates that the poster is acting as a mod, then if you aren't wearing your user hat, wouldn't that entail that you weren't a user at that moment? And non-users don't have active accounts, so...
I get the feeling this rabbit hole goes deep. 
red pill blue pill time.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 18503
Threads: 79
Joined: May 29, 2010
Reputation:
125
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 1:46 pm
(December 17, 2014 at 12:35 pm)pocaracas Wrote: *user hat on*
Come on, guys... don't make fun of the guy... I admit it's fun and easy... but...
Let's be adults, here!
He's clearly heavily indoctrinated which makes his mind particularly incapable of processing what we say... and what science says.... and, well, anything that goes against the holy book.
Mocking just makes him close up and repel our point of view even more.
Who knows how much charisma he has in real life? Maybe he's the kind of guy that can gather a crowd around him and pass on his indoctrinated views... and his distrust of the opposite views.
But if he's shown that the opposite players are kind and warm people, he'll have a much harder time convincing himself and others that these opponents are "evil".
Mock the idea, not the person.
My eyes! They burn! Damn you pocaralho, couldn't you use a darker blue? 
On the subject, he shamelessly claimed to be an apologist. You see, they have 'be prepared to give an answer' as a motto and it tells alot about their credibility and honesty facing discussion. I have been here long enough to know what will happen, he will strut around claiming victory, whatever will happen from now on. You do make a point that thread readers can get something out of the replies given to him, but the goal post move, the disruption and being all over the place instead of focusing in the claim he proposed to prove on the title will dismay even the most interested reader. Given his arrogance, it is nothing to be admired about, that other users are venting their frustration. Pigeon, I called it. To try to play chess with one is ultimately futile.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 2:04 pm
Quote:You see, they have 'be prepared to give an answer'
And it doesn't even have to be a good answer. Just anything so they can retreat into their fairy tale world feeling safe in their stupidity.
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 2:04 pm
(December 17, 2014 at 12:58 pm)Esquilax Wrote: (December 17, 2014 at 12:35 pm)pocaracas Wrote: *user hat on*
W-wait... if you only just now put your user hat on, how did you ever post here before now? If a mod hat indicates that the poster is acting as a mod, then if you aren't wearing your user hat, wouldn't that entail that you weren't a user at that moment? And non-users don't have active accounts, so...
I get the feeling this rabbit hole goes deep.
Dude, my entire reality just disappeared in a *poof* of logic.
Thanks for that.
Oh, and welcome back, you universe-destroying heathen.
Posts: 322
Threads: 3
Joined: November 2, 2014
Reputation:
1
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 2:16 pm
(This post was last modified: December 17, 2014 at 2:20 pm by His_Majesty.)
(December 16, 2014 at 10:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: They clearly didn't share the same will.
Based on???
(December 16, 2014 at 10:52 pm)Jenny A Wrote: How can you have more than one omnipotent being? Either they can't best each other in which case they aren't omnipotent; or they can each best the other in which case they aren't omnipotent.
Omnipotence is only the ability to do what is logically possible...and it isn't logically possible for them to "best" each other.
(December 17, 2014 at 5:35 am)Esquilax Wrote: Not that the rest of your constant switching between whining and desperate, compensatory grandstanding isn't worth commenting on, but are you actually under the impression that the roflol emoticon this bulletin board platform provides plays a substantial role in the efficacy of your arguments?
That says a lot about the intellectual content of your posts. 
Sometimes the goold ole "LOL" or "LMAO" just aint good enough. I need animation.
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 2:21 pm
(December 17, 2014 at 2:16 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: (December 16, 2014 at 10:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: They clearly didn't share the same will.
Based on???
(December 16, 2014 at 10:52 pm)Jenny A Wrote: How can you have more than one omnipotent being? Either they can't best each other in which case they aren't omnipotent; or they can each best the other in which case they aren't omnipotent.
Omnipotence is only the ability to do what is logically possible...and it isn't logically possible for them to "best" each other.
lets get this straight there is 3 separate beings from god who share the same exact knowledge. and whats the point of being 1 being that knows everything if there is 3. and yet god has no internal conflict between those 3.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 322
Threads: 3
Joined: November 2, 2014
Reputation:
1
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 2:25 pm
(December 17, 2014 at 12:35 pm)pocaracas Wrote: [color=#1E90FF]*user hat on*
Come on, guys... don't make fun of the guy... I admit it's fun and easy...
It is easy...for me.
(December 17, 2014 at 12:35 pm)pocaracas Wrote: He's clearly heavily indoctrinated
I am about as indoctrinated with Christian theism as you people are with Darwinian evolution.
Posts: 18503
Threads: 79
Joined: May 29, 2010
Reputation:
125
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 2:27 pm
See? Pointless.
Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 2:28 pm
Absolutely pointless.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 322
Threads: 3
Joined: November 2, 2014
Reputation:
1
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 2:29 pm
(This post was last modified: December 17, 2014 at 2:30 pm by His_Majesty.)
(December 17, 2014 at 2:21 pm)dyresand Wrote: lets get this straight there is 3 separate beings from god who share the same exact knowledge. and whats the point of being 1 being that knows everything if there is 3. and yet god has no internal conflict between those 3.
I think what separates the 3 is experience...for example, Jesus knows what it is like to be a human, and the Father & Holy Spirit doesn't. It may be certain experiences that one has and the others don't that separates the three...but besides that, they are the same.
(December 17, 2014 at 2:28 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Absolutely pointless.
Like a broke pencil...pointless.
|
