RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 2:01 pm
(This post was last modified: December 21, 2014 at 2:03 pm by Minimalist.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 2:07 pm
Thread Rating:
|
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
|
|
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 2:01 pm
(December 21, 2014 at 1:15 pm)Tonus Wrote:(December 21, 2014 at 1:08 pm)whateverist Wrote: Have you overlooked the fact that it was written in red? Around here that is the color of Admin-hat-on speech. As such it could be considered authoritative. Just saying.Dyresand is an admin? /suicide Admin hat on. There is no prohibition on using red or green text here. However, I'll note the following: * It's annoying as fuck. It makes the eyes bleed. * If you're doing to to quote other sources, you're doing it wrong. * If you do it in a way that might make the staff think you're trying to impersonate them, you deserve whatever happens as a result. RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 2:04 pm
(This post was last modified: December 21, 2014 at 2:17 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 2:24 pm
(December 21, 2014 at 2:01 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: * It's annoying as fuck. It makes the eyes bleed. So much this. RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 2:35 pm
(This post was last modified: December 21, 2014 at 2:35 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(December 19, 2014 at 8:49 pm)Minimalist Wrote: The shithead is in jail now and until 2017 for tax charges and other financial crimes. What's this? Another dishonest Christian? I think I see a pattern emerging ... no wonder His_Misery loves the guy. RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 2:35 pm
(This post was last modified: December 21, 2014 at 2:37 pm by Free.)
(December 21, 2014 at 1:53 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:(December 21, 2014 at 1:42 pm)Brucer Wrote: Paul was a 1st century contemporary of Jesus of Nazareth, and he wrote of the crucifixion of Jesus. lol Earl Doherty? ![]() The most entertaining and humorous work of religious fiction I have ever read. RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 2:37 pm
(December 20, 2014 at 7:09 am)His_Majesty Wrote: [...] just to spew the same crap you've been spewing?
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 2:48 pm
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 2:48 pm
(This post was last modified: December 21, 2014 at 2:53 pm by Crossless2.0.)
It takes a special blend of idiocy and shamelessness to uphold Hovind as an authority on anything other than pandering to and benefiting from believers, who are so desperate to maintain their delusions at all costs that truth becomes a game to be won rather than an ideal to respect and strive for. My disgust with H_M at this point is boundless.
Way to witness for your god, H_M! You are a stooge, too stupid to understand how thoroughly you damage the credibility of your religion with virtually every post. Keep up the good work. Remember, you are not only arguing with atheists; you are 'witnessing' to untold numbers of lurkers who judge the quality of your arguments and aren't likely to buy your snake oil. Hovind? Yes, keep reminding everyone how intellectually bankrupt your position really is. If there was an atheist conspiracy to undermine Christianity, we could do worse than to put you on the payroll. RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 2:58 pm
(December 21, 2014 at 2:48 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: It takes a special blend of idiocy and shamelessness to uphold Hovind as an authority on anything other than pandering to and benefiting from believers, who are so desperate to maintain their delusions at all costs that truth becomes a game to be won rather than an ideal to respect and strive for. My disgust with H_M at this point is boundless. I can't be bothered reading back but he actually referred to Hovind as an authority? That's as bad as holding up Comfort or Ham! ![]() ![]()
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)




