RE: Would this be all we need to prove God exists? Or would it require more than this?
January 21, 2015 at 1:47 pm
(This post was last modified: January 21, 2015 at 1:54 pm by watchamadoodle.)
(January 19, 2015 at 11:46 pm)IanHulett Wrote: Hey guys. I got into an argument with a religious person on YouTube, and I asked "What evidence do you have to prove your God exists? Do you have a hair sample? A DNA sample? A urine sample? A semen sample? What do you have that proves your God exists?"
So, basically, I asked for at least one of these:
_Hair sample
_DNA sample
_Urine sample
_Semen sample
I know the last two probably sound absurd, and I feel weird for listing them, but they'd still count as evidence. Would each of these be enough to prove God exists? Or would there be other things to consider as well? Thanks a bunch.
He hasn't gotten back to me yet, btw. I attacked him with harmless Logic.
Also, I'm not sure if this is the right forum, but seeing it has to do with God, I posted it here.
This reminded me of one of the Egyptian creation myths:
Quote:Atum was a self-created deity, the first being to emerge from the darkness and endless watery abyss that existed before creation. A product of the energy and matter contained in this chaos, he created his children—the first deities, out of loneliness. He produced from his own sneeze, or in some accounts, semen, Shu, the god of air, and Tefnut, the goddess of moisture. The brother and sister, curious about the primeval waters that surrounded them, went to explore the waters and disappeared into the darkness. Unable to bear his loss, Atum sent a fiery messenger, the Eye of Ra, to find his children. The tears of joy he shed on their return were the first human beings.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atum
So an Egyptian could say there is lots of physical evidence for God. Every human is descended from a tear of joy.