How/why is the christer gawd so compelling to so many people? We have an all knowing, all powerful gawd who, allegedly, sets up the first two people with the best existence possible. Then he gives them some direction and some simple tasks, tells them something he strongly doesn't want them to do but never adequately establishes the ground rules(*). He does this, knowing beforehand, exactly what the outcome would be. He then proceeds to punish fucking everybody for the "sin" of two people.
Then we get this:
So, not once, but twice, we have an omniscient, omnipotent gawd setting conditions that he knows full well beforehand will fail. With omniscience and omnipotence, gawd should be able to set up a paradise where free will and "sin" are mutually exclusive. Instead, it sets up a world where free will is somehow mutually inclusive with "sin."
So, why do all the good little christers find such a bumbling fucking idiot to be a compelling gawd figure?!?
As a side note, the next time someone makes a film where gawd is an actual character, instead of Morgan Freeman or George Burns the need Rowan Atkinson.
*Please don't trot out the same old tired tripe that gawd told A&E that if they ate from the tree they would die. If you have no understanding of a concept, how can you be expected to understand the consequences. "Don't pick thine ass with thy left middle finger for it is an abomination before me and the punishment is flugaharth!" Sorry, if you don't adequately explain the concept of flugaharth, you haven't adequately explained the ground rules.
TL/DR - Why do christers accept Mr. Bean as a gawd figure?
Then we get this:
(March 4, 2015 at 5:37 pm)Void Wrote: God made a covenant with his people in Deuteronomy 27:26. It consists of 613 commandments that cannot be broken, and which, due to their nature, cannot be followed to perfection.(thanks Void)
See Galatians 3:10-13.
So, not once, but twice, we have an omniscient, omnipotent gawd setting conditions that he knows full well beforehand will fail. With omniscience and omnipotence, gawd should be able to set up a paradise where free will and "sin" are mutually exclusive. Instead, it sets up a world where free will is somehow mutually inclusive with "sin."
So, why do all the good little christers find such a bumbling fucking idiot to be a compelling gawd figure?!?
As a side note, the next time someone makes a film where gawd is an actual character, instead of Morgan Freeman or George Burns the need Rowan Atkinson.
*Please don't trot out the same old tired tripe that gawd told A&E that if they ate from the tree they would die. If you have no understanding of a concept, how can you be expected to understand the consequences. "Don't pick thine ass with thy left middle finger for it is an abomination before me and the punishment is flugaharth!" Sorry, if you don't adequately explain the concept of flugaharth, you haven't adequately explained the ground rules.
TL/DR - Why do christers accept Mr. Bean as a gawd figure?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.