Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 8, 2024, 2:04 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 19, 2015 at 1:10 pm)IanHulett Wrote: I suppose you're right. Honestly, I don't understand why religious folks come here if they don't want to have intelligent conversations, or admit when their arguments are fallacious or even downright wrong.

Concerning themselves with such things isn't in the sales script.  It's a particular variation of sales where it appears that the idea is to blitz your potential customer with sales scripts in a way that will direct their responses to those that go along with your script.

From observation, it seems to work with those who have already bought the car religion but not so well with those who haven't.
The gods did not reveal, from the beginning,
All things to us, but in the course of time
Through seeking we may learn and know things better.

These things are, we conjecture, like the truth.

But as for certain truth, no man has known it,
Nor shall he know it, neither of the gods
Nor yet of all the things of which I speak.
And even if by chance he were to utter
The final truth, he would himself not know it:
For all is but a woven web of guesses.

Xenophanes

Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 19, 2015 at 1:21 pm)Kaninchen Wrote:
(July 19, 2015 at 1:10 pm)IanHulett Wrote: I suppose you're right. Honestly, I don't understand why religious folks come here if they don't want to have intelligent conversations, or admit when their arguments are fallacious or even downright wrong.

Concerning themselves with such things isn't in the sales script.  It's a particular variation of sales where it appears that the idea is to blitz your potential customer with sales scripts in a way that will direct their responses to those that go along with your script.

From observation, it seems to work with those who have already bought the car religion but not so well with those who haven't.

Notice that Kaninchen makes no mention of any of the five facts. Her post is is "to the man" because she has nothing else.

Or do you, Kaninchen?

If you have ancient texts that you wish for us to consider in rebuttal to the gospels, by all means let us know.

The Jews of the first and second century did not deny the crucifixion of Jesus, so we'd all love to see what you have to show us.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 19, 2015 at 1:23 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: If you have ancient texts that you wish for us to consider in rebuttal to the gospels, kaninchen, by all means let us know.

When you eventually get around to establishing them as being worthy of anybody being bothered, Randy, you'll be the first person I'll tell.

(July 19, 2015 at 1:23 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: The Jews of the first and second century did not deny the crucifixion of Jesus, so we'd all love to see what you have to show us.

Come on, Randy, we've been there, done that.  Remember 'Silver Blaze'?

What did the Jewish people do?  Carried on being Jewish and getting into suicidal wars with the Romans while, having failed to convince us, the early Christians developed sales scripts for the more gullible.
The gods did not reveal, from the beginning,
All things to us, but in the course of time
Through seeking we may learn and know things better.

These things are, we conjecture, like the truth.

But as for certain truth, no man has known it,
Nor shall he know it, neither of the gods
Nor yet of all the things of which I speak.
And even if by chance he were to utter
The final truth, he would himself not know it:
For all is but a woven web of guesses.

Xenophanes

Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 19, 2015 at 1:23 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: The Jews of the first and second century did not deny the crucifixion of Jesus, so we'd all love to see what you have to show us.

Did they accept him as the risen son of god?
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 19, 2015 at 1:39 pm)IATIA Wrote:
(July 19, 2015 at 1:23 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: The Jews of the first and second century did not deny the crucifixion of Jesus, so we'd all love to see what you have to show us.

Did they accept him as the risen son of god?

Bingo!  Of course, Randy and the others will tell us how the Jews didn't really understand their own prophetic tradition.  Clearly they weren't as shamelessly creative as, for instance, the author of Matthew, who could find a messianic prophecy fulfilled by Jesus on the back of a fucking cereal box.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 19, 2015 at 1:39 pm)IATIA Wrote:
(July 19, 2015 at 1:23 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: The Jews of the first and second century did not deny the crucifixion of Jesus, so we'd all love to see what you have to show us.

Did they accept him as the risen son of god?

He's just trying to promote his religions agenda. I'd recommend letting him drone on and continue to be close minded. I put him on my ignore list. So, I won't know if he responds to anything I post, and honestly, IDGAF. Ironically, his signature gave me that idea.
If pinkie pie isn't real, then how do you explain the existence of ponies, huh? If ponies are real, then that's proof that Pinkie Pie is real. Checkmate, christians!  Heart
_______________________________
Let's stop fighting and and start smiling! This is our one and only life to live... let's be friends and live it with smiles! Big Grin

-- Book of Pinkie Pie 7:3
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 19, 2015 at 1:28 pm)Kaninchen Wrote:
(July 19, 2015 at 1:23 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: If you have ancient texts that you wish for us to consider in rebuttal to the gospels, kaninchen, by all means let us know.

When you eventually get around to establishing them as being worthy of anybody being bothered, Randy, you'll be the first person I'll tell.

See how she works, folks?

She hasn't got anything...if she did, she would post it and silence me in a moment. But she wants to give the appearance of having some knowledge that would provide a refutation of the Christian argument. The problem is, in eight years at CAF, she hasn't produced it, and she won't here, either.

I've argued with lots of Orthodox and Protestants over the years, and almost without exception, they have offered evidence from scripture or from the Early Church Fathers or even from the Church Councils in support of their positions. Kaninchen will not offer anything like that.

So, even though, arguably, all of you atheists would benefit from hearing Kaninchen's brilliant response to the arguments for the resurrection and divinity of Jesus, none of you will ever hear it. Because no such response exists.

Ironically, she calls me a used car salesman, but when you get down to it, she's the one trying to get you to buy into the idea that she knows what she's talking about without ever showing you any evidence that the car she wants you to buy even exists. It's vaporware...the promise of an argument that she cannot deliver. But she's peddling it, nonetheless.

How 'bout them apples, K? [Image: ani_dancing.gif]

(July 19, 2015 at 1:23 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: The Jews of the first and second century did not deny the crucifixion of Jesus, so we'd all love to see what you have to show us.

Come on, Randy, we've been there, done that.  Remember 'Silver Blaze'?

What did the Jewish people do?  Carried on being Jewish and getting into suicidal wars with the Romans while, having failed to convince us, the early Christians developed sales scripts for the more gullible.[/quote]

More correctly, the Christians continued preaching and converting Jews and gentiles alike until the Roman Empire itself became Christian and Judaism was relegated to a footnote in history.

But don't worry, K. You're still God's chosen people, and he has big plans for you. I daresay that the Iranian nuke deal foolishly agreed to by our idiot president will move things toward a climatic finish sooner rather than later.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Meh, I think you should have poured the jewhate on a little thicker, it didn't come off as catholic enough. The roman empire didn't become christian through any evangelical apparatus. It wasn't "preaching and converting" that spread the faith, it was "rape and pillage". I'm wondering how you came to such a strange belief about both christianity -and- the romans.....?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
That's 100 pages!

Any facts yet?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Randy Carson wrote: But don't worry, K. You're still God's chosen people, and he has big plans for you. I daresay that the Iranian nuke deal foolishly agreed to by our idiot president will move things toward a climatic finish sooner rather than later.

I knew that Baptists and Pentecostals like to blow smoke up the Jews' asses while secretly jacking off at the thought of their imminent destruction in whatever sick Christian end times scenario du jour they embrace, but I had no idea it was a Catholic thing too. Oh wait, on second thought your church has a nice long history of anti-Semitism, doesn't it? I know, I know . . . you love the Jews. You just also like to imagine they get what you think they deserve.

But you love them. Yeah, we get it. You're an ecumenical hero, Randy. Grab an altar boy on the way out. Hell, take two. You've earned it.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 3496 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 9317 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 20693 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 17827 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 13379 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 41927 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 29762 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 20747 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 383731 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 7859 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)