|
Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
|
 (August 6, 2015 at 9:53 am)Little Rik Wrote: Gee, you must have a lot of knowledge Nutter to know exactly. No. Philosophy is for smart people. Little Rik needs to go back to elementary school and learn some basics.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
 (August 6, 2015 at 10:32 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:(August 6, 2015 at 9:53 am)Little Rik Wrote: Gee, you must have a lot of knowledge Nutter to know exactly. Oh, Little Rik come to the conclusion that Nutter know EXACTLY nothing. All smoke and no roast as people would say. As a vegetarian i would say ALL BOAST AND NO SUBSTANCE. 
 (August 6, 2015 at 10:32 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:(August 6, 2015 at 9:53 am)Little Rik Wrote: Gee, you must have a lot of knowledge Nutter to know exactly. Starting with some basic logic and critical thinking skills...and also science. I think he's lacking some science.
Verbatim from the mouth of Jesus (retranslated from a retranslation of a copy of a copy):
"Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you too will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. How can you see your brother's head up his ass when your own vision is darkened by your head being even further up your ass? How can you say to your brother, 'Get your head out of your ass,' when all the time your head is up your own ass? You hypocrite! First take your head out of your own ass, and then you will see clearly who has his head up his ass and who doesn't." Matthew 7:1-5 (also Luke 6: 41-42) Also, I has a website: www.RedbeardThePink.com  RE: Atheism the unscientific believe.
August 6, 2015 at 11:22 am
(This post was last modified: August 6, 2015 at 11:26 am by Lucanus.)
Enrico,
Non hai dimostrato nulla di quello che hai detto. Se la gente non ti crede un perché ci sarà. Ogni volta che te ne esci con un thread nuovo, ecco una caterva di commenti di persone che ti chiedono sempre la stessa cosa - da dove te ne esci? Ora, io sono una persona paziente e comprensiva, e voglio davvero capire da dove tiri fuori le tue strambe teorie. Se stai parlando di "spiriti", " anime", eccetera devi in qualche modo dimostrare che queste esistono, portando dei casi nei quali la loro azione non sia in NESSUN modo imputabile anche al cervello. Devi soprattutto dimostrare che la coscienza riesca a sopravvivere in assenza di un cervello integro (o di strutture comparabili), se vuoi farci credere che da esso è separata. Tutto fumo e niente arrosto... Basta con le canne, eh? Enrico, You haven't demonstrated anything of what you mentioned. If people don't believe you, there's a reason. Every time you come up with a new thread there's always a buttload of people who ask you the same question: where are you coming from? Now, I'm a patient guy and I really want to know where you pull your arguments out of (inb4 his arse, but bear with me). If you're talking about "spirits" and "souls" you've got to demonstrate that these things exist, bringing up examples in which their action is in NO way also possible for the brain to carry out. Most of all, you've got to prove that consciousness is able to survive independently of a working brain (or any comparable kind of network) if you want us to believe such claims. All smoke and no roast... Perhaps you should drop that joint, eh? 
"Every luxury has a deep price. Every indulgence, a cosmic cost. Each fiber of pleasure you experience causes equivalent pain somewhere else. This is the first law of emodynamics [sic]. Joy can be neither created nor destroyed. The balance of happiness is constant.
Fact: Every time you eat a bite of cake, someone gets horsewhipped. Facter: Every time two people kiss, an orphanage collapses. Factest: Every time a baby is born, an innocent animal is severely mocked for its physical appearance. Don't be a pleasure hog. Your every smile is a dagger. Happiness is murder. Vote "yes" on Proposition 1321. Think of some kids. Some kids."
PS: se sei curioso su questi argomenti, leggiti un libro di neurofisiologia
"Every luxury has a deep price. Every indulgence, a cosmic cost. Each fiber of pleasure you experience causes equivalent pain somewhere else. This is the first law of emodynamics [sic]. Joy can be neither created nor destroyed. The balance of happiness is constant.
Fact: Every time you eat a bite of cake, someone gets horsewhipped. Facter: Every time two people kiss, an orphanage collapses. Factest: Every time a baby is born, an innocent animal is severely mocked for its physical appearance. Don't be a pleasure hog. Your every smile is a dagger. Happiness is murder. Vote "yes" on Proposition 1321. Think of some kids. Some kids." RE: Atheism the unscientific believe.
August 6, 2015 at 11:33 am
(This post was last modified: August 6, 2015 at 11:34 am by Homeless Nutter.)
(August 6, 2015 at 10:54 am)Little Rik Wrote: Oh, Little Rik come to the conclusion that Nutter know EXACTLY nothing. Oh, noes! Please, don't say that. I REALLY care about your dumb-ass opinion...
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
All that Italian talk is making me hungry. Fumo! Arrosto!
(August 6, 2015 at 12:14 pm)JesusHChrist Wrote: All that Italian talk is making me hungry. Fumo! Arrosto! May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage
"Every luxury has a deep price. Every indulgence, a cosmic cost. Each fiber of pleasure you experience causes equivalent pain somewhere else. This is the first law of emodynamics [sic]. Joy can be neither created nor destroyed. The balance of happiness is constant.
Fact: Every time you eat a bite of cake, someone gets horsewhipped. Facter: Every time two people kiss, an orphanage collapses. Factest: Every time a baby is born, an innocent animal is severely mocked for its physical appearance. Don't be a pleasure hog. Your every smile is a dagger. Happiness is murder. Vote "yes" on Proposition 1321. Think of some kids. Some kids." (August 6, 2015 at 11:22 am)Lucanus Wrote: Enrico, It is obvious that adults are reluctant to admit that they are wrong. To admit it it would show a failure and most people are too proud to admit a failure. Beside their false believes are so entrenched that they find impossible to estirpate from their mind the dogma. So what they do? They reject the obvious and blame those who tell the truth with talking bullshit. No wonder that my reputation here is next to zero while those who procrastinate the dogma (false truth) have a very high reputation. I destroyed the dogma that man is omnivore. I show that nobody here knows the meaning of philosophy. I show that there is no evidence that when the body die also the consciousness die. I show that there can not be any real progress in the material-physical universe. I show that with the limited human consciousness it is not possible to understand what there may be outside so all option are possible. Well, what else i can add other than reject your unfounded criticism. An impartial and independent board would surely prove you wrong but who care. After all i am having a lot of fun by enlightened your failure.
 RE: Atheism the unscientific believe.
August 7, 2015 at 4:46 am
(This post was last modified: August 7, 2015 at 4:48 am by Longhorn.)
Nice argumentum ad enricum!
I can do it too: I'm right, you're wrong. Because reasons. You can't prove me wrong. I'm right. And like, soooo much smarterer than you. I totes win yo. Obviously I have much to learn from the master of this art, but it ain't half bad a try |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
