Posts: 29960
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
158
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 15, 2015 at 12:33 am
(This post was last modified: October 15, 2015 at 12:33 am by Angrboda.)
Quote:There can be little doubt, however, that the OBE component of the NDE still provides the best opportunity to seriously challenge conventional views of the relationship between consciousness and the brain. Although somewhat unconventional (to say the least), attempts to test the veridicality of OBEs using hidden targets (e.g., Parnia et al., 2001) should be welcomed. Should any such test ever produces convincing evidence that the OBE truly allows one to view the world without using the known visual channels, this would indeed be a major challenge to conventional science. To date, no such evidence has been forthcoming.
"Near-death experiences in cardiac arrest survivors" ~ Christopher C. French
Posts: 3541
Threads: 0
Joined: January 20, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 15, 2015 at 1:00 am
(This post was last modified: October 15, 2015 at 2:39 am by Homeless Nutter.)
(October 14, 2015 at 10:58 pm)jenny1972 Wrote: didnt know you could dream without any brain function which was verified by all 3 machines
So - you've have NEVER had a dream, that seemed to last for hours, or even days, but upon awakening it turned out you only slept for a few minutes?
It only takes the brain seconds (maybe less) to crate illusory realities and when you are unconscious - you have no way of knowing what time it is in the real world.
And then - of course - there's no way of verifying, what the person actually experienced, how much of the details have been suggested to them afterwards, if they are just making the whole thing up, or confusing a memory of a TV show with their own experience (because near-death experience scene, with the tunnel and the light and the soothing sounds/voice has been used in - like - every TV show, ever), and so on, and so forth.
Dreams are just dreams. Near-death experiences are dreams, interpreted in the most biased and unreliable way possible.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 15, 2015 at 3:51 am
(This post was last modified: October 15, 2015 at 4:18 am by robvalue.)
Jenny is clearly using a different definition of "brain dead" to the rest of us. (I'm being serious, that wasn't sarcasm.)
What happens in the brain is not always a reliable source of information about reality. That's why science demands independent verification and not just testimony.
As homeless says, I've had dreams that seemed to go on for hours, days even, but took place in about a minute of real time. And those dreams were a load of horse shit that I have no reason to think have any relevance. When the brain is fucked up and on the verge of shutting down, it's going to produce even more garbage than normal and should be treated with further suspicion. The brain is not good at accurately assessing itself during and after such events. It's certainly interesting to see how the brain reacts, but adding significance to the dreams is the argument from ignorance until any evidence is presented.
Posts: 977
Threads: 11
Joined: July 17, 2015
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 15, 2015 at 5:11 am
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 15, 2015 at 7:18 am
I suppose in theory you could have a machine which detects exactly when your brain creates these images, and what they are. The person's own idea of when they were created will almost certainly be very different.
But it doesn't matter. It's still the brain producing images. So what? What is it supposed to prove? Brains can basically provide you with any image you can imagine; it's just you can't easily make it do what you want.
Posts: 4238
Threads: 29
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 15, 2015 at 7:28 am
(October 14, 2015 at 11:10 pm)jenny1972 Wrote: anyways we wont know for sure until we die ourselves but there many indications that there is life after death these experiences have a lot in common and they upset religious people because its not what they are preaching so therefore i support it
Not only upset religious people.
They also upset atheists for the same reason.
Atheists most of the times if not always sing the same mantras like .....there is no life after physical death......or the consciousness is a product of the brain and so on and at the same time praise the physical science as the panacea for all problems but when this science contradict them then they reckon that doctors are a bunch of idiots not able to understand whether the bloke is alive or dead.
Nothing new Jenny.
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
132
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 15, 2015 at 7:33 am
(This post was last modified: October 15, 2015 at 7:39 am by Edwardo Piet.)
There is a complete lack of evidence for life after death, and it doesn't fit in with common sense considering there is also a lack of evidence for all other supernatural and paranormal superstitious B.S..
I'm not expecting to find any evidence for life after death anytime soon... treating it as anything special to look for is merely wishful thinking of wanting life to live on past our deaths, I reckon.
I am open to evidence, but I'd be totally surprised, and I might as well go looking in the forests for the invisible pink unicorn.
Posts: 1635
Threads: 9
Joined: December 12, 2011
Reputation:
42
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 15, 2015 at 7:41 am
If by "upsetting to atheists" you mean "complete bullshit," then we agree.
There's no credible evidence to suggest NDEs are anything more than chemicals in the brain. I find it continually amusing that believers accuse us of "not having an open mind" while their minds are firmly shut to any information that seemingly contradicts their pet theories.
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
132
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 15, 2015 at 7:44 am
(This post was last modified: October 15, 2015 at 7:45 am by Edwardo Piet.)
I just had a near death experience... honest.
Praise Jebus. I'm convinced that that supernatural walking-on(shallow)-water twat was nailed to a cross and came back from the dead because my heart just stopped for 2 seconds and I consider that a NDE... also I saw visions of angels and shit (yes they had 6 pairs of breasts but that is irrelevant). It's totally not a non-sequitur! No it it's not! Fuck OFF!
(For anyone seriously worried... my heart is fine I lied and I don't have heart problems ).
Posts: 1635
Threads: 9
Joined: December 12, 2011
Reputation:
42
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 15, 2015 at 7:52 am
I'm convinced. It was the six pairs of breasts.
|