Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Cyberman]

I disagree with your use of "close to", but otherwise echo the sentiments.

[robvalue]

Sure. He does at least seem to recognise some of the words I use, although not their meaning. I guess that's about as far as it goes.

[Cyberman]

Turn about is fair play - I recognise some of the words he uses, but the unnatural and possibly illegal order in which he clumps them together makes my eyes sad.

[Homeless Nutter]

Sure. He does at least seem to recognise some of the words I use, although not their meaning. I guess that's about as far as it goes.

[robvalue]

It's strange because he has occasionally conceded to me before that some usages of his words are incorrect, but then within an hour he's back to using them in the exact wrong way again.

This raises concerns to me about his mental health. The alternative is that he is ruthlessly dishonest to Olympic standards. But he would still have much competition on that score from people on my block list.

[Little Rik]

Don't you realize that you just made an unsubstantiated statement?
How would you know whether there is a God that control everything or the universe doesn't need a controller when in fact physical science has yet to answer this question?
You create a belief in your mind that the situation is such and such which come with no evidence of whatsoever therefore as such it become a dogma.





There is no physical evidence.
That doesn't mean that evidence can be found elsewhere.
In any case you did state that there is no need for a God without backing your statement with evidence.  

So my statement that there is a lack of evidence needs to backed up with evidence?

That is correct Wind.
You came to the conclusion that there is a lack of evidence but this conclusion didn't explore all avenues.
According to materialists-intellectual minds there is a dogma that say that evidence can only be found within the physical world and this dogma prevent people from exploring other avenues therefore it is
correct to say that your evidence lack a possible evidence.  

Don't you get bored of these back and forth arguments?

Actually is not me that goes back and forth.
It is you guys that change subject all the time in order to hide the fact that you are stuck in the corral of dogmas.  

BTW what religion do you follow?, do you have a reason to follow your particular religion or is it just blind faith?, what makes your religion/god any more true compared to other religions/gods?
Your thread has already been derailed and most of your opening statements have been debunked so i don't see what use this thread is other then entertainment.

Didn't i tell you that if an impartial judge would have to judge it would be you and not me to be debunked.  

[ignoramus]

My startrek universal translator just short circuited?

[Edwardo Piet]

Good movie:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POxMp61Ksbk

Although I prefer the 2nd one.

[Little Rik]

Good movie:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POxMp61Ksbk

Although I prefer the 2nd one.

Why would anyone need an Hero?
I got a better idea.
Wouldn't be better to become an Hero ourselves by conquering our inner self?  

[Reforged]

Good movie:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POxMp61Ksbk

Although I prefer the 2nd one.

Why would anyone need an Hero?
I got a better idea.
Wouldn't be better to become an Hero ourselves by conquering our inner self?  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koJlIGDImiU