Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Cyberman]

I am still waiting for the phone number of your dealer enrico. Whatever it is, seems like good shit.

Sure you want to risk it? Look what it's done to him.

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

Is a pity that you are not paying attention to what i already explained several times.
I said...........CAN YOU GIVE EVIDENCE THAT YOU ARE IN LOVE?
Suppose someone pop up and ask you that question?
What would you say?
You probably would say....OF COURSE I AM IN LOVE WITH SUCH AND SUCH A PERSON.
But that pedantic nutter will not believe.
How would you explain then considering that love is something within very hard to extrapolate except
when you love someone?
Not easy son but now consider this.
Physical love is hard enough to extrapolate so how can extrapolate something a lot more subtle like
spiritual love?
Maybe (as i already said) in the future will invent something able to see deep inside who knows.
In the past highly spiritual people were represented with an aura or aureola on the head.
In the meantime the only way to reveal whether God exist or not is to engage in spirituality.
By digging deep within in your subconscious you will be able to find the real gold and have evidence that God is there.  

Okay, Rik, I'll play your game, Why don't you give us at least 10 examples of actual people that are in love, by your definition.
We can continue on from there.

I am NOT here to give anyone private tuition.
The best way for you is to wake up and grow up so you can better understand how the whole system works.
I give you however a small tip.
Love is like a spectrum with different degrees.
You can have 100% pure love or you can have some love mixed up with lust or self interest
so this is not real love as per definition.
Now i leave up to you to understand what i mean.
Take your time pool.
I will see tomorrow if you make good use of my tip.
Night.  

Oh noes Ricky.
Are you telling me you have no examples to show for your definition of love?
So through out the recorded history of human history you are unable to present a mere 10 examples of love by your definition.
Oh snap!
Are you realizing the bullshit you have bullshitted yourself into now?

[Little Rik]

It is not possible. Very good argument Rik, very smart.  *applause*
Now all you have left to do is to show evidence for something that is NOT physical which cannot be understood by using a physical tool.

Is a pity that you are not paying attention to what i already explained several times.
I said...........CAN YOU GIVE EVIDENCE THAT YOU ARE IN LOVE?
Suppose someone pop up and ask you that question?
What would you say?
You probably would say....OF COURSE I AM IN LOVE WITH SUCH AND SUCH A PERSON.
But that pedantic nutter will not believe.
How would you explain then considering that love is something within very hard to extrapolate except
when you love someone?
Not easy son but now consider this.
Physical love is hard enough to extrapolate so how can extrapolate something a lot more subtle like
spiritual love?
Maybe (as i already said) in the future will invent something able to see deep inside who knows.
In the past highly spiritual people were represented with an aura or aureola on the head.
In the meantime the only way to reveal whether God exist or not is to engage in spirituality.
By digging deep within in your subconscious you will be able to find the real gold and have evidence that God is there.  

I am NOT here to give anyone private tuition.
The best way for you is to wake up and grow up so you can better understand how the whole system works.
I give you however a small tip.
Love is like a spectrum with different degrees.
You can have 100% pure love or you can have some love mixed up with lust or self interest
so this is not real love as per definition.
Now i leave up to you to understand what i mean.
Take your time pool.
I will see tomorrow if you make good use of my tip.
Night.  

Oh noes Ricky.
Are you telling me you have no examples to show for your definition of love?
So through out the recorded history of human history you are unable to present a mere 10 examples of love by your definition.
Oh snap!
Are you realizing the bullshit you have bullshitted yourself into now?

Is not my fault if you don't understand the first time i explain.  
To explain again and again the same thing would require private tuition
which is something that i don't do unless i get paid for.  
Beside why should i waste my precious time with retarded kids?  
One more tip however.
Don't try to start your learning with issue too big for you to understand
like whether God exist or not or what is real love and what require a real love.
Start instead from the ABC of knowledge like ...FROM WHAT POINT EVOLUTION START ......
.....OR .....IS THE CONSCIOUSNESS A PRODUCT OF THE BRAIN OR THE OTHER WAY AROUND.  

[Little Rik]

It is not possible. Very good argument Rik, very smart.  *applause*
Now all you have left to do is to show evidence for something that is NOT physical which cannot be understood by using a physical tool.

Is a pity that you are not paying attention to what i already explained several times.
I said...........CAN YOU GIVE EVIDENCE THAT YOU ARE IN LOVE?
Suppose someone pop up and ask you that question?
What would you say?
You probably would say....OF COURSE I AM IN LOVE WITH SUCH AND SUCH A PERSON.
But that pedantic nutter will not believe.
How would you explain then considering that love is something within very hard to extrapolate except
when you love someone?
Not easy son but now consider this.
Physical love is hard enough to extrapolate so how can extrapolate something a lot more subtle like
spiritual love?
Maybe (as i already said) in the future will invent something able to see deep inside who knows.
In the past highly spiritual people were represented with an aura or aureola on the head.
In the meantime the only way to reveal whether God exist or not is to engage in spirituality.
By digging deep within in your subconscious you will be able to find the real gold and have evidence that God is there.  

I am still waiting for the phone number of your dealer enrico. Whatever it is, seems like good shit.

Sure you want to risk it? Look what it's done to him.

Stim mate.  

I had a dream.  


I dreamed that you would be my guru in life so i could learn how the whole system works.
Unfortunately you reject my mateship.  

What can i do?  

Where else can i learn what philosophy is or how evolution works or whether consciousness is a product of the brain or the other way around.

Who will ever teach me these important issue now?  
Please Stim help LR to understand.  

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

Is a pity that you are not paying attention to what i already explained several times.
I said...........CAN YOU GIVE EVIDENCE THAT YOU ARE IN LOVE?
Suppose someone pop up and ask you that question?
What would you say?
You probably would say....OF COURSE I AM IN LOVE WITH SUCH AND SUCH A PERSON.
But that pedantic nutter will not believe.
How would you explain then considering that love is something within very hard to extrapolate except
when you love someone?
Not easy son but now consider this.
Physical love is hard enough to extrapolate so how can extrapolate something a lot more subtle like
spiritual love?
Maybe (as i already said) in the future will invent something able to see deep inside who knows.
In the past highly spiritual people were represented with an aura or aureola on the head.
In the meantime the only way to reveal whether God exist or not is to engage in spirituality.
By digging deep within in your subconscious you will be able to find the real gold and have evidence that God is there.  

Oh noes Ricky.
Are you telling me you have no examples to show for your definition of love?
So through out the recorded history of human history you are unable to present a mere 10 examples of love by your definition.
Oh snap!
Are you realizing the bullshit you have bullshitted yourself into now?

Is not my fault if you don't understand the first time i explain.  
To explain again and again the same thing would require private tuition
which is something that i don't do unless i get paid for.  
Beside why should i waste my precious time with retarded kids?  
One more tip however.
Don't try to start your learning with issue too big for you to understand
like whether God exist or not or what is real love and what require a real love.
Start instead from the ABC of knowledge like ...FROM WHAT POINT EVOLUTION START ......
.....OR .....IS THE CONSCIOUSNESS A PRODUCT OF THE BRAIN OR THE OTHER WAY AROUND.  

PAhahahahahahaha
So basically your argument is: bla bla bla, blablabla, blabla bla bla, consciousness, consciousness, blabla consciousness.

Gee, I wonder how I'm going to go about to counter these well formed arguments of yours

[robvalue]

Wait, you're not tutoring us?

What exactly are you doing then?

[Expired]

In nature the small merge into the big.
A drop of water will sooner or later merge into the creek.
The creek will merge into the river and the river will merge into the big ocean.
A cell is composed of matter and consciousness.
This consciousness can be tiny as much as you want but nevertheless there is a minute tiny amount of consciousness.
When we eat we absorb these cells.
The physical side of these cells build our body but what happen to the consciousness side of the cells?
Will it die or will enter or better say merge into our bigger consciousness?
According an Atheist point of view when the body die also the consciousness die so there is nothing left there other than
the physical side that build up our body.
Does this belief make any sense?
If it does make sense than why carnivorous people are more aggressive while vegetarians are more relaxed?
It seems that what we eat determine the way we act and think and therefore make sense to say that the consciousness of the
cells in the food that we are eating merge into our consciousness.
If we follow this line of thinking then we also have to consider what happen when our body die.
Will our consciousness die when our body die or will carry on and merge into what our feelings wish to take us?
Why would our consciousness die when as we can see in nature nothing die?
The small always merge into the big so to me it is totally UNSCIENTIFIC to say that with the physical death everything die. 

Can I pick up on one of your points, my wife is a vegetarian and she's off her head aggressive, maybe she's a secret meat eater eh?

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

In nature the small merge into the big.
A drop of water will sooner or later merge into the creek.
The creek will merge into the river and the river will merge into the big ocean.
A cell is composed of matter and consciousness.
This consciousness can be tiny as much as you want but nevertheless there is a minute tiny amount of consciousness.
When we eat we absorb these cells.
The physical side of these cells build our body but what happen to the consciousness side of the cells?
Will it die or will enter or better say merge into our bigger consciousness?
According an Atheist point of view when the body die also the consciousness die so there is nothing left there other than
the physical side that build up our body.
Does this belief make any sense?
If it does make sense than why carnivorous people are more aggressive while vegetarians are more relaxed?
It seems that what we eat determine the way we act and think and therefore make sense to say that the consciousness of the
cells in the food that we are eating merge into our consciousness.
If we follow this line of thinking then we also have to consider what happen when our body die.
Will our consciousness die when our body die or will carry on and merge into what our feelings wish to take us?
Why would our consciousness die when as we can see in nature nothing die?
The small always merge into the big so to me it is totally UNSCIENTIFIC to say that with the physical death everything die. 

Can I pick up on one of your points, my wife is a vegetarian and she's off her head aggressive, maybe she's a secret meat eater eh?

That would depend on the level of consciousness of your wife.
Did you try switching it off and on?

[Cyberman]

Dear IT Support,

Eighteen months ago I upgraded to Girlfriend 1.0 from Drinking Mates 4.2 which I'd used for years without any trouble. However, there are apparently conflicts between these two products and the only solution was to try and run Girlfriend 1.0 with the sound turned off. To make matters worse, Girlfriend 1.0 is also incompatible with several other applications, such as Lads Night Out 3.1, Football 2 and Playboy 6.1. Successive versions of Girlfriend proved no better.

A shareware beta-program, Party Girl 2.1, which I tried, had many bugs and left a virus in my system, forcing me to shut down completely for several weeks. Eventually I tried to run Girlfriend 1.2 and Girlfriend 1.0 at the same time, only to discover that when these two systems detected each other they caused severe damage to my hardware.

Sensing a way out, I then upgraded to Fiancée 1.0 only to discover that this product soon had to be upgraded (at great cost) to Wife 1.0, which I reluctantly agreed to because, whilst Wife 1.0 tends to use up all my available resources, it does come bundled with FreeSex Plus and Cleanhouse 2000.

Shortly after this upgrade however I then discovered that Wife1.0 can be very unstable and costly to run. For example, any mistakes I made were automatically stored in Wife 1.0's memory and could not be deleted. They then resurfaced months later when I had forgotten about them. Wife 1.0 also has an automatic Diary Explorer and E-mail porn filter, and can, without warning, launch Photostrop and Whingezip! These latter products have no helpfiles and I have to try and guess what the problem is myself.

Additional costly problems are that Wife 1.0 needs updating regularly, requiring Shoe Shop Browser for new attachments and also Hairstyle Express which needs to be reinstalled every other week. Wife 1.0 also spawns unwelcome child processing that also drains my resources. It also conflicted with some of the new games I wanted to try, stating that they are an illegal operation.

When Wife 1.0 attaches itself to my Audi TT programme it often crashes or runs the system dry. Wife 1.0 also has a rather annoying pop-up called Mother-in-Law, which can't be turned off. Recently I've attempted to try Mistress 2001, but there could be problems: a friend has alerted me to the fact that if Wife 1.0 detects the presence of Mistress 2001 it tends to delete all my MS Money files before un-installing itself.

Please can you help me.
Joe


Dear Joe,

This is a very common problem that men complain about but it is mostly due to a primary misconception. Many people upgrade from Girlfriend 1.0 to Wife 1.0 with the idea that Wife 1.0 is merely a "utilities & entertainment" program. Wife1.0 is an operating system and designed by its creator to run everything. It is unlikely you would be able to purge Wife 1.0 and still convert back to Girlfriend 1.0. Hidden operating files within your system would cause Girlfriend 1.0 to emulate Wife 1.0 so nothing would be gained.

It is impossible for you to un-install, delete, or purge the program files from the system once installed. You cannot go back to Girlfriend 1.0 because Wife 1.0 is not designed to do this. Mistress 2001 is a possibility but your friend is right about the effect this has on your MS Money files. The temptation after that is to install Girlfriend 1.3 or Wife 2.0 but end up with more problems than the original system - (look in your manual under "warnings - alimony/child support"). I recommend you keep Wife 1.0 and just deal with the situation.

Having Wife 1.0 installed myself, I might also suggest you read the entire section regarding General Partnership Faults (GPFs). You must assume all responsibility for every fault and problem that might occur, regardless of its cause. The best course of action will be to enter the command c:apologise.

In any case, avoid excessive use of the "esc" key because ultimately you will have to give the apologise command before the operating system will return to normal. The system will run smoothly as long as you take the blame for all the GPFs.

Wife 1.0 is a great program, but very high maintenance. Consider buying additional software to improve the performance of Wife 1.0. I recommend Flowers 2.1 and Chocolates 5.0, but do not, under any circumstances, install Secretary With Short Skirt 3.3. This is not a supported application for Wife 1.0 and is likely to cause irreversible damage to the operating system.

Best of luck.
IT Desk

(Not mine, sadly. Other variants are available.)

[Little Rik]

It is not possible. Very good argument Rik, very smart.  *applause*
Now all you have left to do is to show evidence for something that is NOT physical which cannot be understood by using a physical tool.

Is a pity that you are not paying attention to what i already explained several times.
I said...........CAN YOU GIVE EVIDENCE THAT YOU ARE IN LOVE?
Suppose someone pop up and ask you that question?
What would you say?
You probably would say....OF COURSE I AM IN LOVE WITH SUCH AND SUCH A PERSON.
But that pedantic nutter will not believe.
How would you explain then considering that love is something within very hard to extrapolate except
when you love someone?
Not easy son but now consider this.
Physical love is hard enough to extrapolate so how can extrapolate something a lot more subtle like
spiritual love?
Maybe (as i already said) in the future will invent something able to see deep inside who knows.
In the past highly spiritual people were represented with an aura or aureola on the head.
In the meantime the only way to reveal whether God exist or not is to engage in spirituality.
By digging deep within in your subconscious you will be able to find the real gold and have evidence that God is there.  

In nature the small merge into the big.
A drop of water will sooner or later merge into the creek.
The creek will merge into the river and the river will merge into the big ocean.
A cell is composed of matter and consciousness.
This consciousness can be tiny as much as you want but nevertheless there is a minute tiny amount of consciousness.
When we eat we absorb these cells.
The physical side of these cells build our body but what happen to the consciousness side of the cells?
Will it die or will enter or better say merge into our bigger consciousness?
According an Atheist point of view when the body die also the consciousness die so there is nothing left there other than
the physical side that build up our body.
Does this belief make any sense?
If it does make sense than why carnivorous people are more aggressive while vegetarians are more relaxed?
It seems that what we eat determine the way we act and think and therefore make sense to say that the consciousness of the
cells in the food that we are eating merge into our consciousness.
If we follow this line of thinking then we also have to consider what happen when our body die.
Will our consciousness die when our body die or will carry on and merge into what our feelings wish to take us?
Why would our consciousness die when as we can see in nature nothing die?
The small always merge into the big so to me it is totally UNSCIENTIFIC to say that with the physical death everything die. 

Can I pick up on one of your points, my wife is a vegetarian and she's off her head aggressive, maybe she's a secret meat eater eh?

You can always find out whether your wife eat meat while you are asleep.
Put a light coat of talcum powder outside the fridge where you keep your meat
and check in the morning for any footprint.  
Just joking.
I don't think your wife would tell you lies.
One thing however you should remember.
People don't change all of a sudden just because they stop eating meat.
It take long time to clean the filthy blood coming from a life of meat eating.
And even if they didn't eat meat all their life they still can be aggressive.
This problem arise from a bad karma from previous lives.  
However it is a lot lot better a vegetarian diet because it soften the aggressivity that would be much much worse with a meat diet.