"nothing is constant in this world but change" is it true?

[Paul the Human]

"nothing is constant in this world but change" is it true?


just wanna here your points.^^

I assume you mean you want to hear our points (by which you mean 'thoughts') on that quote. First of all, the quote itself is credited to the Greek philosopher Heraclitus of Ephesus (c.535 BC - 475 BC) and has been translated in many forms. The most common translation is "Nothing endures but change." Heraclitus was called "The Riddler" by Timon of Phlius and was known for making obscure and contradictory statements.

The statement you are referencing, in my opinion, is naive and childish. Of course everything changes. Saying that 'everything changes' is the only 'constant' is just a silly play on words, not some kind of Great Wisdom.

It really deserves no more attention than that.

[tavarish]

It's an annoying knack of humans to point out the painfully obvious.

[Darwinian]

It's an annoying knack of humans to point out the painfully obvious.

As in, "You're very tall!", or, "You appear to have fallen down a 30 foot hole!", or, "So this is it, we're going to die!"

[tavarish]

It's an annoying knack of humans to point out the painfully obvious.

As in, "You're very tall!", or, "You appear to have fallen down a 30 foot hole!", or, "So this is it, we're going to die!"

Some of my favorites:

"It's raining!"

"It's really hot outside!"

"That looks like it hurt"

[Violet]

History often gets rewritten.

What is history but a fable agreed upon?

[The_Flying_Skeptic]

why is this in the religion threads? the speed of light is a constant... haha

[Minimalist]

This is just a play of words and translates as "everything changes".

A/K/A Shit Happens.

[aufis]

if everything changes, can it justify that there are no evidence/proofs(because ''everything changes) to be considered.

Or should i state ''it is an exemption''?

[Zen Badger]

if everything changes, can it justify that there are no evidence/proofs(because ''everything changes) to be considered.

Or should i state ''it is an exemption''?

This question makes no sense at all.

[KichigaiNeko]

if everything changes, can it justify that there are no evidence/proofs(because ''everything changes) to be considered.

Or should i state ''it is an exemption''?

You've been in the Banannas again haven't you??

Please define / spcify you question as it is not making any sensse at all.