Dear Resident Theists

[Whateverist]

Are you stupid, or do you just  think we are? 

/smh

I think you are.

Oh good, this conversation is officially over.  Bye bye, DonkeyComa.

[robvalue]

The probability of getting at least one six while throwing a fair D6 die n times is 1 - (5/6)^n

[Ronkonkoma]

I think you are.

Oh good, this conversation is officially over.  Bye bye, DonkeyComa.

I'm sorry I was just joking.

My source is Hugh Ross, who is an astro-physicist at the University of British Columbia, where I studied. Of course I diodn't researched all of this, I just copied his references.

Otherwise I work as a doctor over here in Seattle. Don't have much time to research these things.

[robvalue]

Why did you mention any of it? Were we to presume it was of no relevance to the discussion?

[Lucanus]

^ Tedious. I suspect Lucanus meant a source for the list itself and its bibliography, unless you actually did all the research yourself. In which case, kudos to you. Kudos I say.

^this

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Bullsh*t.

No - these are NOT your sources. You've never even seen any of those publications. You just copied and pasted an old article by a creationist nut-job - Hugh Ross, as well as its list of dubious references. 
http://www.reasons.org/articles/probabil...h-apr-2004

Are you stupid, or do you just  think we are? 

/smh

I think you are.

Quote mining another website for sources you've never read And have no idea of the content?

That's not just stupid, it's intellectually dishonest and reveals that you're not interested in dialogue, merely strutting with academic references which, again, If anyone here asked you to cite the exact text within a reference that supports your thesis you'd be unable to do.

[Cyberman]

Prophecy: he'd just say "I gave you the source, read it for yourself".

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Prophecy: he'd just say "I gave you the source, read it for yourself".

Which, being a 'doctor' he'd know was actually not a way to forward an argument. Copy and pasting someone else's argument and saying 'I agree' is a fast track way to get kicked out of university with the academic staff laughing all the way to the bank with your tuition fee.

"What about source X or author X which you've presented supports your case in chapter Y?"
"...errr?
"Get out."

[Ronkonkoma]

Prophecy: he'd just say "I gave you the source, read it for yourself".

Which, being a 'doctor' he'd know was actually not a way to forward an argument. Copy and pasting someone else's argument and saying 'I agree' is a fast track way to get kicked out of university with the academic staff laughing all the way to the bank with your tuition fee.

"What about source X or author X which you've presented supports your case in chapter Y?"
"...errr?
"Get out."

jea just don't read what I write.

[Neo-Scholastic]

I'd like to hear you try to prove that assertion without referencing some a priori principle.

Would you like to hear why Bigfoot must exist? I can prove he exists without any tangible evidence, by using half assed arguments. That makes him real.

You can try if you like, but first I am calling your bluff. Prove that you can demonstrate the existence of anything without making any a priori assumptions.