Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 8, 2026, 6:25 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A doctrine of alienation
#21
RE: A doctrine of alienation
I don't really like strip clubs. I don't judge those who work there, nor pity them, except for those who took on that career out of the desperation of poverty (but then, what job can't be described that way?) or who are drug addicts getting sucked deeper into that world. The reason I don't like them is I see them for what they are: we have made sex and especially female nudity a taboo thing, in this Christian-influenced culture, and as such it produces a tantalizing effect on those who see it as the untouchable thing just out of reach. Me, I don't see the subject as taboo, and I don't get excited by women I am not actually intimate with; also, I see the women in the job as they really are, I know a few women who do that job, I've listened to what they told me, and so I don't fall for the fantasy. Therefore it is not a "temptation" to me.

Perhaps it is the fact that I don't see it as a "sin" that makes it neither appealing nor a threat to me. Likewise, the only thing about Christianity that bothers me is the threat that it represents to me, both in terms of attempts to legislate their beliefs into law and/or a position of dominance (see e.g. 1954, with the Pledge and the Motto, or the National Day of Prayer ceremonies), and in terms of their "doctrine of alienation", in which they teach their followers to turn off their brains to any outside influence (cult, much?) and to separate from anyone, even family and loved ones, who might tell them they're in that cult religion for poor reasons.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost

I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.

Reply
#22
RE: A doctrine of alienation
(September 18, 2015 at 12:57 pm)Rhythm Wrote: How does something like revelations square away with your attempts to avoid violent entertainment for fear of becoming callous or jaded, btw?  
Nit-pick, it's Revelation (singluar), not Revelations (plural). 1) There is a difference between the glorification of senseless violence and the actions of justice. 2) The end result of the Apocalypse starts in Chapter 21, with the birth of a new heaven and a new earth in which He will wipe the tears from our eyes and there will be no more mourning or death for those things will have passed away. It is a book of hope and joy.
Reply
#23
RE: A doctrine of alienation
A book of joy and hope.....filled with violence and degradation.  Sounds like a war movie, or a mob movie... Personally, I see no justice there, I see glorification of senseless acts of violence - even more..deification of senseless acts of violence (and not just there, throughout the entirety of the OT and NT).

Mind you, I love stories, I think that the biblical narrative would be utter garbage if it weren;t for all the blood and gore and sex, all the boot stomping, popcorn munching human drama...............I don't begrudge it that device, lol. I just wonder what it is that twists your panties when Dolph Lundgren strings villagers ears together, but somehow when David makes a belt of phillistine foreskin.....it's different, why one is to be avoided and the other is the exact opposite, to be poured over and studied and reread to no end - that one is unacceptable -even as entertainment-...while the other forms the foundational fabric of an acceptable religion. Seems like you're making special exceptions for a pet narrative. Seems hypocritical, even sanctimonious.....to me.

No one will be wiping any tears from my eyes, btw. I'll be crushed beneath the cruel boot of King Jesus and/or left to whither being tormented by the denziens of hell...or failing all of that - shuffled off into eternal solitary confinement.... all "justice" for the "crime" of not bending the knee and daring to be so uppity as to not believe that there's any -actual- justice (let alone hope or joy) in that narrative. This is something that wouldn't change if I saw the heavenly host descend and the narrative begin to unfold in the real world. That would only serve to calcify my opinion completely.

I'm not part of your in-group, or hadn't you heard? Wink
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#24
RE: A doctrine of alienation
(September 18, 2015 at 2:15 pm)Rhythm Wrote: No one will be wiping any tears from my eyes, btw.  I'll be crushed beneath the cruel boot of King Jesus and/or left to whither being tormented by the denziens of hell...or failing all of that - shuffled off into eternal solitary confinement....
Neither. You will be left outside the walls of the New Jerusalem with the rest of your kind.
Reply
#25
RE: A doctrine of alienation
(September 18, 2015 at 2:46 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Neither. You will be left outside the walls of the New Jerusalem with the rest of your kind.

Sweet!

Announcement to the rest of youz guyz: I'll be throwing an eternal infidels party at the South Gate, with these guys.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost

I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.

Reply
#26
RE: A doctrine of alienation
(September 18, 2015 at 2:46 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Neither. You will be left outside the walls of the New Jerusalem with the rest of your kind.

Oh...I see... "Hope and Joy"..Hallellujah!...lol?  Outside those walls....anything I ought to know before that happens....or is it gonna be another one of my thursdays?

In any case...regarding strings of ears and foreskins.....and which is to be avoided whilst the other worshipped, and why..again? I seem to have missed any actual discussion on that count.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#27
RE: A doctrine of alienation
(September 18, 2015 at 11:59 am)Rhythm Wrote: Seems your brother has traded one vice for another.  Sucks, but that's how the SA makes their nut.  Who dropped him off with those ghouls in the first place, or did he just float down the drain into their clutches?

My brother has been reliant upon living with one family member or another since he turned 18. He dropped out of diesel mechanic school merely months away from completion. Hasn't been able to hold jobs down for the same reason he quit school; he rage quits. Once his truck got repossessed he resorted to buying beer for underage kids where he lived and doing acid. My uncle gave him a second, third try (being unabl to afford mortgage on his own for each of those times), but he ended up just sleeping away his troubles till he ended up on the street. My mom and step mom got him in there, which is a feat considering Colorados overpopulation issues. My step mom used to work with the people there as a drug counselor. I don't quite expect my brother to do anything to improve from here--but maybe, maybe he will. I know it sounds pessimistic but I've spent years hoping and praying for my father. Without medical intervention they just keep goin down the drain despite my offers of support and resolution. To my father the only way I could help him in his eyes was to live in his fantasy world which I literally could no longer do with sound conscience for his and others well being.
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!

Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.

Dead wrong.  The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.

Quote:Some people deserve hell.

I say again:  No exceptions.  Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it.  As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.

[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]
Reply
#28
RE: A doctrine of alienation
(September 18, 2015 at 2:46 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:
(September 18, 2015 at 2:15 pm)Rhythm Wrote: No one will be wiping any tears from my eyes, btw.  I'll be crushed beneath the cruel boot of King Jesus and/or left to whither being tormented by the denziens of hell...or failing all of that - shuffled off into eternal solitary confinement....
Neither. You will be left outside the walls of the New Jerusalem with the rest of your kind.
Unless you are a Jew how do you expect to get in when there's no gate for you to enter the golden cube called New Jerusalem?  Hint:  the name means that it's only for Jews.    So if you're a Gentile it's the lake of fire for you.
Reply
#29
RE: A doctrine of alienation
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!

Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.

Dead wrong.  The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.

Quote:Some people deserve hell.

I say again:  No exceptions.  Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it.  As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.

[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]
Reply
#30
RE: A doctrine of alienation
(September 18, 2015 at 6:43 pm)Rhythm Wrote:
(September 18, 2015 at 2:46 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Neither. You will be left outside the walls of the New Jerusalem with the rest of your kind.

Oh...I see... "Hope and Joy"..Hallellujah!...lol?  Outside those walls....anything I ought to know before that happens....or is it gonna be another one of my thursdays?

In any case...regarding strings of ears and foreskins.....and which is to be avoided whilst the other worshipped, and why..again?  I seem to have missed any actual discussion on that count.

Not surprisingly, Chad doesn't want to talk about foreskin necklaces, Rhythm. Might stick with the strippers instead, at least they know what a Gstring is. Wink
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!

Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.

Dead wrong.  The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.

Quote:Some people deserve hell.

I say again:  No exceptions.  Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it.  As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.

[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Trinity Doctrine: Help me out, Christians GrandizerII 169 50296 February 9, 2018 at 8:48 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  What's wrong with the doctrine of God's self-exisence?... dave4shmups 30 17338 November 6, 2010 at 11:03 am
Last Post: Captain Scarlet
  The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity? Sam 41 32231 September 12, 2009 at 2:44 am
Last Post: fr0d0



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)