Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 28, 2024, 9:24 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Kent Hovind challenges Thunderf00t to a debate!
#31
RE: Kent Hovind challenges Thunderf00t to a debate!
I cannot help by feel it gives these shitbirds recognition they don't deserve. How can there be actual debate where one side is totally comfy with "lying for Jesus" while the other is held to a personal assessment of intellectual and scientific integrity?
Reply
#32
RE: Kent Hovind challenges Thunderf00t to a debate!
(September 18, 2015 at 8:29 am)houseofcantor Wrote: I cannot help by feel it gives these shitbirds recognition they don't deserve. How can there be actual debate where one side is totally comfy with "lying for Jesus" while the other is held to a personal assessment of intellectual and scientific integrity?

They already have recognition they don't deserve. I think these debates serve to expose the lies.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Reply
#33
RE: Kent Hovind challenges Thunderf00t to a debate!
(September 18, 2015 at 8:37 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote:
(September 18, 2015 at 8:29 am)houseofcantor Wrote: I cannot help by feel it gives these shitbirds recognition they don't deserve. How can there be actual debate where one side is totally comfy with "lying for Jesus" while the other is held to a personal assessment of intellectual and scientific integrity?

They already have recognition they don't deserve. I think these debates serve to expose the lies.

Would be better to throw cream pies.
Reply
#34
RE: Kent Hovind challenges Thunderf00t to a debate!
TBH, I get Kent Hovind, Eric Hovind and Ken Ham all mixed up.

But who the fuck cares? It's like the godhead: you get three for the intellectual equivalence of one.
Teenaged X-Files obsession + Bermuda Triangle episode + Self-led school research project = Atheist.
Reply
#35
RE: Kent Hovind challenges Thunderf00t to a debate!
I think you're overestimating the level of intellect somewhat, but I agree with the point.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#36
RE: Kent Hovind challenges Thunderf00t to a debate!
(September 18, 2015 at 8:58 am)houseofcantor Wrote:
(September 18, 2015 at 8:37 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: They already have recognition they don't deserve. I think these debates serve to expose the lies.

Would be better to throw cream pies.
Shit would work better. Your idea be a waste of good pie.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Reply
#37
RE: Kent Hovind challenges Thunderf00t to a debate!
Maybe Thunderfoot could just laugh constantly at everything Hovind says, and not debate at all? I'd pay to watch that.

This is a really, really scary and dangerous video about the Footster taking on the spawn of the possible opponent.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9BfsHsVGNg
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#38
RE: Kent Hovind challenges Thunderf00t to a debate!
(September 17, 2015 at 9:34 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: The issue is that the creationists are already being taken seriously by a non critical audience. If no one challenges them they just spread their bullshit unopposed.

That's the conundrum, yes, but I don't think a formal debate is the proper way to challenge. That forum should be left for two competing ideas, so inviting a creationist to a debate implies that creationism is on the same playing field as science. Creationism needs to be laughed at like the absurd theory it is, which means treating it like the flat-earthers.

Honestly, I think the only way to truly eradicate this nonsense is with a ground up approach through better education. Sure, you'll need to supplement it with other efforts like organizations that specifically combat creationits' stupidity, but I think without giving kids a good formal education, it's all for naught.

It's better to give kids the tools to poke holes in creationist garbage than to do it ourselves.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#39
RE: Kent Hovind challenges Thunderf00t to a debate!
(September 18, 2015 at 8:29 am)houseofcantor Wrote: I cannot help by feel it gives these shitbirds recognition they don't deserve. How can there be actual debate where one side is totally comfy with "lying for Jesus" while the other is held to a personal assessment of intellectual and scientific integrity?

This is also a really good point. Why invite people to a game that have proven they don't intend to play fairly?
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#40
RE: Kent Hovind challenges Thunderf00t to a debate!
(September 18, 2015 at 3:22 pm)robvalue Wrote: Maybe Thunderfoot could just laugh constantly at everything Hovind says, and not debate at all? I'd pay to watch that.

This is a really, really scary and dangerous video about the Footster taking on the spawn of the possible opponent.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9BfsHsVGNg

Computer   I've seen that little video twice now and I strongly suggest not watching it.  It is indeed an exercise in frustration.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god.  If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Tim Pool challenges Jack Dorsey and Vijya Gadde on Twitter baises EgoDeath 0 256 March 5, 2019 at 8:28 pm
Last Post: EgoDeath
  When Hovind met the Crocoduck Cyberman 1 827 June 17, 2017 at 5:01 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
Video Video | UNCUT Christopher Hitchens & Stephen Fry debate Woody68 1 1344 April 8, 2013 at 12:47 pm
Last Post: Nine
  Carrier vs. Licona debate on the resurrection Tea Earl Grey Hot 7 3960 July 1, 2012 at 11:48 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Hilarious Atheist vs. Theist debate highlights Tea Earl Grey Hot 4 3296 May 9, 2012 at 9:39 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Anyone had a debate like this? Rev. Rye 2 1861 December 27, 2011 at 11:01 pm
Last Post: TheDarkestOfAngels
  Debate ability quiz. Ziploc Surprise 2 1555 November 5, 2011 at 10:30 pm
Last Post: Erinome
  Every Debate With A Creationist.... Minimalist 4 2832 September 13, 2011 at 7:43 am
Last Post: searchingforanswers
  Ray Comfort Interviews Thunderf00t: Morality HeyItsZeus 13 3259 July 24, 2011 at 3:04 pm
Last Post: fr0d0
  Thunderf00t interviewing the WBC? LastPoet 29 7469 July 14, 2011 at 3:18 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)