Debunking the "Dying and Rising Gods" Theory

[Homeless Nutter]

The "dying and rising gods" theory is a currently popular argument against Christianity which states that Jesus was a copycat - or rather that His disciples were simply copying other pagan religions when they claimed that Jesus died and rose again from the dead.

Although this theory has been thoroughly debunked in the past, it occasionally rears its ugly head requiring a fresh effort to dismantle it. In the following passage taken from his book, Did Jesus Exist?, atheist Bart Ehrman provides just such a demolition of this copycat nonsense.

---

Ehrman writes:

“[Consider] the instance of Osiris, commonly cited by mythicist as a pagan parallel to Jesus. Osiris was an Egyptian god about who a good deal was written in the ancient world. We have texts discussion Osiris that span a thousand years. None was as influential or as well known as the account of the famous philosopher and religion scholar of the second Christian century, Plutarch, in his work Isis and Osiris. According to the myths, Osiris was murdered and his body was dismembered and scattered. But his wife, Isis, went on a search to recover and reassemble them, leading to Osiris’ rejuvenation. The key point to stress, however, is that Osiris does not—decidedly does not—return to life. Instead he becomes the powerful ruler of the underworld. And so for Osiris there is not rising from the dead.

“[Jonathan Z.] Smith maintains that the entire tradition about Osiris may derive from the processes of mummification in Egypt, where bodies were prepared for ongoing life in the realm of the dead (not as resuscitated corpses here on earth). And so Smith draws the conclusion, ‘In no sense can the dramatic myth of his death and reanimation be harmonized to the pattern of dying and rising gods.’ The same can be said, in Smith’s view, of all the other divine beings often pointed to as pagan forerunners of Jesus. Some die but don’t return; some disappear without dying and do return; but none of them die and return.

“Jonathan Z. Smith’s well-documented views have made a large impact on scholarship. A second article, by Mark S. Smith, has been equally informative. Mark Smith is a scholar of the ancient Near East gods and Hebrew Bible who also opposes any notion of dying and rising gods in the ancient world. Mark Smith makes the compelling argument that when [Sir James George] Frazer devised his theory about dying and rising gods, he was heavily influenced by his understanding of Christianity and Christian claims about Christ. But when one looks at the actual data about the pagan deities, without the lenses provided by later Christian views, there is nothing to make one consider them as gods who die and rise again. Smith shows why such views are deeply problematic for Osiris, Dumuzi, Melqart, Heracles, Adonis and Baal.

“According to Smith, the methodological problem that afflicted Frazer was that he took data about various divine beings, spanning more than a millennium, from a wide range of cultures, and smashed the data all together into a synthesis that never existed. This would be like taking views of Jesus from a French monk of the twelfth century, a Calvinist of the seventeenth century, a Mormon of the late nineteenth century, and a Pentecostal preacher of today, combining them all together into one overall picture and saying, “That’s who Jesus was understood to be.” We would never do that with Jesus. Why should we do it with Osiris, Heracles, or Baal? Moreover, Smith emphasizes, a good deal of our information about these other gods comes from sources that date from a period after the rise of Christianity, writers who were themselves influenced by the Christian views of Jesus and ‘who often received their information second-hand.’ In other words, they probably do not tell us what pagans themselves, before Christianity, were saying about the gods they worshiped.

“The majority of scholars agree with the views of Smith and Smith: there is not unambiguous evidence that any pagans prior to Christianity believed in dying and rising gods, let alone that it was a widespread view held by lots of pagans in lots of times and places.” (Bart Ehrman, Did Jesus Exist?, 228-230.)

+++

Special thanks to AF Moderator pocaracas for his guidance regarding this post via PM at CAF.

---

That's really neat, Randy. And yet, with all that copypasta - you're still no closer to proving that Jesus existed, that he was a god, or even that there are any gods at all. You could just as well be arguing against the theory, that Jon Snow is secretly a Thargarian, for all the material difference it makes in the real world.

Oh, well - whatever keeps you occupied...

[Iroscato]

The "dying and rising gods" theory is a currently popular argument against Christianity which states that Jesus was a copycat - or rather that His disciples were simply copying other pagan religions when they claimed that Jesus died and rose again from the dead.

Although this theory has been thoroughly debunked in the past, it occasionally rears its ugly head requiring a fresh effort to dismantle it. In the following passage taken from his book, Did Jesus Exist?, atheist Bart Ehrman provides just such a demolition of this copycat nonsense.

---

Ehrman writes:


+++

Special thanks to AF Moderator pocaracas for his guidance regarding this post via PM at CAF.

---

That's really neat, Randy. And yet, with all that copypasta - you're still no closer to proving that Jesus existed, that he was a god, or even that there are any gods at all. You could just as well be arguing against the theory, that Jon Snow is secretly a Thargarian, for all the material difference it makes in the real world.

Oh, well - whatever keeps you occupied...

FUCK THAT. Targaryen. You hurted me

[Randy Carson]

Oh, look! Another thread in which rexbeccarox fails to deal with the argument preferring to attack the man instead. Color me...

...not surprised.

Which man? You? Or the guy actually making the argument?

Yet another ad hominem. Color me...

...confirmed in what I said about your empty posts.

[Randy Carson]

The "dying and rising gods" theory is a currently popular argument against Christianity which states that Jesus was a copycat - or rather that His disciples were simply copying other pagan religions when they claimed that Jesus died and rose again from the dead.

Although this theory has been thoroughly debunked in the past, it occasionally rears its ugly head requiring a fresh effort to dismantle it. In the following passage taken from his book, Did Jesus Exist?, atheist Bart Ehrman provides just such a demolition of this copycat nonsense.

---

Ehrman writes:


+++

Special thanks to AF Moderator pocaracas for his guidance regarding this post via PM at CAF.

---

That's really neat, Randy. And yet, with all that copypasta - you're still no closer to proving that Jesus existed, that he was a god, or even that there are any gods at all. You could just as well be arguing against the theory, that Jon Snow is secretly a Thargarian, for all the material difference it makes in the real world.

Oh, well - whatever keeps you occupied...

It's a process.

One by one, I pull the rugs out from under the silly arguments that people make against Christianity.

In the end, the only position still standing is the one the Church has been holding for 2,000 years.

[abaris]

Which man? You? Or the guy actually making the argument?

Yet another ad hominem. Color me...

...confirmed in what I said about your empty posts.

Curious definition of an ad hominem. Questioning you copy pasting one author quoting another author from a collection of essays he wrote in 1988 and selling it as an absolute is an ad hominem now?

Curious indeed, but whatever rocks your boat.

[The Grand Nudger]

Oh, well - whatever keeps you occupied...

...rather than bombing abortion clinics, the "protestant" bar down the street...... or impoverishing african nations at random while cultivating horrible diseases like they were turnips in a field of misery.

I couldn't help it..lol.

[JesusHChrist]

In the end, the only position still standing is the one the Church has been holding for 2,000 years.

"The belief that a cosmic Jewish zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree..."

That position?

[Neo-Scholastic]

I'm not surprised that the Lord would prepare the pagan world for His Advent by foreshadowing His arrival.

[The Grand Nudger]

Are you similarly un-surprised that the effect of this "foreshadowing" would be ruinous for centuries after the fact - that even after having eradicated pagan competition...that absent the usual targets, the pious host of christ would turn on themselves and cannibalize the remainder?  That the kind of practical jokes god gets up to when he's bored? That a show of his competence or intentions?

What -would- surprise you..I wonder........given your apparently high tolerance for the unexpected.

[Randy Carson]

Yet another ad hominem. Color me...

...confirmed in what I said about your empty posts.

Curious definition of an ad hominem. Questioning you copy pasting one author quoting another author from a collection of essays he wrote in 1988 and selling it as an absolute is an ad hominem now?

Curious indeed, but whatever rocks your boat.

The ad hominem was implicit.

Rather than deal with the argument itself, rex chose to take another shot at me (that's the ad hominem) by suggesting that my quoting someone else is a problem.

It isn't. It's expert testimony that supports my position.