|
the hammer of homosexuality
|
 (October 10, 2015 at 12:00 pm)Randys brother Wrote:(October 10, 2015 at 11:02 am)Spooky Wrote: You're*Well thanks for correcting me on the spelling. Scientists*
If The Flintstones have taught us anything, it's that pelicans can be used to mix cement.
-Homer Simpson  (October 10, 2015 at 12:36 pm)Mermaid Wrote:(October 10, 2015 at 12:00 pm)Randys brother Wrote: Well thanks for correcting me on the spelling. Well thanks again for correcting me on the spelling,but it's more about the point am making. (October 10, 2015 at 12:42 pm)Randys brother Wrote:(October 10, 2015 at 12:36 pm)Mermaid Wrote: Scientists* I am making*
If The Flintstones have taught us anything, it's that pelicans can be used to mix cement.
-Homer Simpson  (October 10, 2015 at 10:52 am)Randys brother Wrote:(October 10, 2015 at 10:50 am)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: How is that supposed to work when men were required to marry their brothers' widows? sweet! so if i remember correctly the no man with man law is also in the old testement so does not apply. right. no sir I do believe that you Jesus said that he did not come to change the laws. my understanding is that he came so that we didn't have to sacrifice goats. (and the goats were happy)
WOW guys thanks for all the responses.
It seems that our one christian poster did not actually tackle the question of just how much their god is involved in the making of homosexuality. In helping make homosexuality a possibility it shows to me that either this god is cruel or non existent. This tells me that it is more likely that the book was written by misogynistic goat herding men. Thus my idea of the "hammer". I feel that if the Christians are forced to face the knowledge that their god is responsible for the creation of such "abominations" then what of the so called love of God? invariably their rope of faith must unravel if they have any sanity and comprehension of reality. 
Lemonvariable72
Copenhagen School  Religious Views: Its all bullshit to keep you handing money to the usher. (October 10, 2015 at 4:25 am)Neimenovic Wrote: I really don't care (other than pure curiosity) if sexual orientations are entirely, partially, or not at all biological. None of these options are a valid reason for busy bodies to judge whether what consenting adults do in private is ok by them. Well actually this research could give us insight in how to deal with pedophiles as that does seem to behave as a sexual orientation.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time; And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player, That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.  (October 10, 2015 at 6:02 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote:(October 10, 2015 at 4:25 am)Neimenovic Wrote: I really don't care (other than pure curiosity) if sexual orientations are entirely, partially, or not at all biological. None of these options are a valid reason for busy bodies to judge whether what consenting adults do in private is ok by them. As it was explained to me, there are sexual orientations (homosexual, heterosexual, bisexual, asexual) and then there are perversions that could exist within each - except for, perhaps, asexual! - and that these are different things. The perversions are twists where an individual gets pleasure out of damaging others. This applies to rapists, some sadists, and pedophiles. The vast majority of pedophiles are heterosexual males.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
 (October 10, 2015 at 6:53 pm)drfuzzy Wrote:(October 10, 2015 at 6:02 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: Well actually this research could give us insight in how to deal with pedophiles as that does seem to behave as a sexual orientation. It seems they are separate systems, more akin to a fetish, rather than an orientation. As Dr.Fuzzy pointed out, it's unrelated to sexual orientation.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
