Here's why Creatards might be right

[Edwardo Piet]

I get kudos from Jenny Jen Jen Jen when I speak of evolution. I guess she just likes me lol

[Ravenshire]

I don't claim intelligent design. I claim design.

You're arguing semantics.

[Ravenshire]

Formerly in the sense that the parameters were fed before the execution.

Got some evidence that the parameters pre-existed the Big Bang?

[Ravenshire]

Did it...and you have some means to demonstrate that this is so?  Please, share, on the way to collecting your Nobel.

awwwwwwww <333333333

You can't possibly tell me that an explosion took place without any particles now can you?

You do know that the Big Bang was not actually an explosion, right?

[jenny1972]

everyone who has gone to public school knows about evolution and ive been to public schools

So how have you managed to get it so wrong, then?  You just weren't paying attention?  Everyone knows this stuff....except you?

were not debating evolution so the theory of evolution is irrelevant

[Ravenshire]

Computers -all- have their own language, that is determined by their composition and arrangement.  It's called a machine language.  Higher level programming, what you think of as code, is just a way for human beings to communicate with the computer.  No matter how a computer is built..and even if one happened to form in the absence of our intervention (which is both possible and well evidenced) it would have a machine language..no need for us to supply that.

But why, would any of that matter?   OFC....you think that DNA is a code, written by a programmer.  It's not....if we're going to use the analogy of computers, for poetic effect, DNA is machine language.  If DNA had a different structure, it would have a different machine language.  It might have helped, before you made this comment, to know anything at all about computers or biology..and you're right..it doesn't take a masters in either.....

..so what's your excuse, Jen?

@Pool
Still pursuing ignorance for it's own sake, are we?

yes right if the DNA had a different structure it would be different . but it was created to have a certain distinct structure a certain DNA . chemicals and atoms also are made up of complex structures , you are assuming that chemistry and atoms just created themselves without intelligence . does our computers , an unthinking entity , do this write its own code decide for itself what it will be ?

Actually, self-modifying code exists. You're ignorant on many subjects aren't you.

[jenny1972]

no i will continue to post comments

And you will continue to embarrass yourself. Your choice to hang your ignorance out there for everyone to mock.

its fine i dont mind at all i will continue to ignore your mocking if it bothered me or embarrassed me at all why would i continue posting ?

[The Grand Nudger]

were not debating evolution so the theory of evolution is irrelevant

No..we aren't debating it at all...I'm correcting you.  This has to be done, because you keep asking -the same question- of everyone.......and that question, is a misaprehension of evolutionary theory.  As regards it's relevance...you keep asking how/why living creatures got this that or the other....so......pretty damned relevant.

Evolution is not random.
Evolution is not random.
Evolution is not random.
Evolution is not random.

That's twelve times now, all told, just tonight - counting my responses alone.  Please confirm.

[Ravenshire]

This is all irrelevant to evolution of course Jenny, how life or the universe began is not what evolution is about.

i know were not talking about whether evolution occured but why evolution evolved as it did , through random chance or intelligent design

(emphasis is mine)

False dichotomy.

[Ravenshire]

i understand and believe in evolution

You obviously don't and it's apparent when you ask why birds don't decide to turn into turtles.