Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 1, 2026, 6:42 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument
#41
RE: My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument
First up, welcome to the forums.

Secondly, sorry, but anyone can make such claims to promote and support their religions or beliefs.

I can claim that the Eternal Teddybear, in all His Plushness, has always existed, is the creator of everything, and is outside our universe and beyond our understanding.

The claims of such things does not mean it's real.

If there's something in the universe beyond our understanding and that isn't testable, then there's no need to believe in it.

And, if such a being exists and wants the fleas upon the face of the Earth known as Humans to worship it, then it needs to show itself.

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
#42
RE: My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument
(December 23, 2015 at 3:11 pm)Mohammed - Muslim and Proud Wrote: Well, it is not something I can have, the concept of God is axiomatic. God is there, the evidence is overwhelming. It just depends on the evidence you are exposed to.

I'll have you demonstrate this first before your go around claiming it as if it's true. As Pandae pointed out, simply asserting it has no bearing on the reality.

If the evidence is so overwhelming for the claim to be axiomatic, it should be relatively easy to demonstrate your god.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply
#43
RE: My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument
(December 23, 2015 at 3:14 pm)Mohammed - Muslim and Proud Wrote:
(December 23, 2015 at 3:12 pm)Pandæmonium Wrote: What's your evidence of your version of whatever God it is you are a slave to?

Are you playing us by being so demonstrably hypocritical?

The evidence for a God is the Holy Quran. When read in the full context, you will understand what I mean.

Lol. So then evidence of your particular non-existent being is circular reasoning?

Wow, what an impressive thing your worship that the evidence for it can be demolished in one sentance.

Do you have any actual evidence? Why won't you answer any of mine and other's rebuttals? Asserting that what you believe is true doesn't make it so, so you've got to put your evidence where your mouth is.
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.

[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]
Reply
#44
RE: My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument
(December 23, 2015 at 3:08 pm)Mohammed - Muslim and Proud Wrote:
(December 23, 2015 at 3:06 pm)Evie Wrote: Agreed. I pick universe.

Well it depends on the evidence you have, you cannot state universe just because you " agree " with it. What is your evidence for an infinite universe?


As you said, we can all agree that the universe exists. But the fact that the universe exists, is only evidence that the universe exists.

You are the one that is adding an unnecessary entity to existence. It is up to you to provide your evidence.

And, no, your attempt at some form of the cosmological argument is not evidence.

You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Reply
#45
RE: My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument
(December 23, 2015 at 3:14 pm)Mohammed - Muslim and Proud Wrote: The evidence for a God is the Holy Quran. When read in the full context, you will understand what I mean.

Reading about a fantasy will not provide proof. Only some kind of twisted entertainment.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#46
RE: My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument
Everyone everywhere can observe the same universe and see the exact same properties from all over the world. In case of God, even your own kind can't agree on the same definition, let alone the world. So which is more real?

You said you believe the Quran to be true based on stuff like the big bang being mentioned in there? Older religions like Hinduism also claim the same thing, so how is yours and special? Those blanket statements can be twisted to fit whatever scientific doctrine you want. But even if I assume those to be facts, why would these facts have to be from divine origin and not from human intellect?

Lastly you claim repeatedly god is far beyond human understanding, so why do you pretend to understand it? Are you some kind of inhuman freak?
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu

Join me on atheistforums Slack Cool Shades (pester tibs via pm if you need invite) Tongue

Reply
#47
RE: My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument
Obviously god lives in another dimension? Can you be more specific?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#48
RE: My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument
Please. He doesn't even have a handle on the 4th dimension.

Edit: See Post 17
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#49
RE: My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument
(December 23, 2015 at 1:50 pm)Mohammed - Muslim and Proud Wrote: 1. The Creator is called The Creator, so how can the Creator have a creator if he is The Creator?

You still haven't answered the question, "if everything which exists was created by something else, what created god?"

Quote:2. The question can be turned around, which will allow me to ask: " If the universe created man, then who created the universe? "

What point are you trying to make? Man exists because the universe exists, that much is given, but your question makes no sense.

Quote:3. Only do things in our galaxy and universe and space-time, require a creator. God is obviously out of space and time, and the galaxy and universe, in another dimension, in which we do not understand.

Show evidence for this extra dimension for which we do not understand. Until we can show that it exists, it is perfectly reasonable, logical and sound to assume that the sum total of reality is that which we can show to be in existence, and anything posited to be outside it does not exist. So until you can point to something which shows this extra dimension you assume actually does exist, my lack of belief in god is more grounded in reality than your belief in god.

Quote:4. This is like saying that an explanation requires an explanation, which would lose you in an infinite regress, which is clearly contradictory to the bases and fundamentals of science.

I'm sorry but this doesn't even make sense.

Quote:5. Antony Flew in his book states:

Now, clearly theists and atheist can agree on one thing: if anything at all exists, there must be something preceding it that always existed. How did this eternally existing reality come to be? The answer is that it never came to be. It always existed. Take your pick: God or universe. Something always existed

So in your attempt to show that god doesn't have a creator, you admit that god needs to have a creator to exist. Give me a moment, I need to check something *Shakes Mo's head, hears loud rattle* Yeah, definitely some screws gone loose inside there Mo, I'd suggest you go see a head doctor, stat.


__________________________________________
(December 23, 2015 at 1:59 pm)Mohammed - Muslim and Proud Wrote: As a muslim, I am not allowed to use profanity because Islam teaches me to respect people, regardless of their beliefs and views.

As the fictional character I have based my avatar on would doubtlessly say "To make a sound of hollow laughing". If you think islam teaches respect for all despite their views, you're a bigger head case than I previously thought.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli

Home
Reply
#50
RE: My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument
(December 23, 2015 at 3:15 pm)Beccs Wrote: First up, welcome to the forums.

Secondly, sorry, but anyone can make such claims to promote and support their religions or beliefs.

I can claim that the Eternal Teddybear, in all His Plushness, has always existed, is the creator of everything, and is outside our universe and beyond our understanding.

The claims of such things does not mean it's real.

If there's something in the universe beyond our understanding and that isn't testable, then there's no need to believe in it.

And, if such a being exists and wants the fleas upon the face of the Earth known as Humans to worship it, then it needs to show itself.

Well a manufactured product always come with a manual or a guide, you never see the manufacturer.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Kalam Cosmological argument. JJoseph 113 26311 January 10, 2024 at 12:38 am
Last Post: Astreja
  A 21st Century Ontological Argument: does it work. JJoseph 23 6669 January 9, 2024 at 8:10 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights. Nishant Xavier 63 13996 July 15, 2023 at 12:50 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 38266 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Is the Argument from Degrees contradictory to the 3rd Law of Thermodynamics? FlatAssembler 49 11216 June 26, 2023 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: Belacqua
  Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy? FlatAssembler 61 14310 June 20, 2023 at 5:59 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  A simple argument against God Disagreeable 149 39827 December 29, 2022 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  My Almighty VS your argument against it Won2blv 43 11137 May 5, 2022 at 9:13 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ? R00tKiT 225 59393 April 17, 2022 at 2:11 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Dawkins loses humanist title Paraselene 165 32858 June 6, 2021 at 1:45 am
Last Post: Peebothuhlu



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)