Rcc thinks Charlie Hebdo is the devil

[Crossless2.0]

brother, satire is the douche bag form of bullying, only it's not called bullying because douche bags have bann that word. so they came up with 'satire' to describe what by all rights is indeed nothing more than one group bullying another group who is different by mocking a predominate trait of those not in the 'satirical' group/the cool kid group, IN An Excepted Way, By Other Douche Bags. Satirists are not the mirror, they are the kids mocking the one pictured in the mirror, and are allowed to get away with it because they are liked/cool.

What is truly sad of all satirists, that they are, no better than those in whom they hate/mock, and don't even know it. Most of them don't/won't ever see themselves as the monsters they make others out to be. That what makes satire different than bullying. Bullies know that they are doing wrong, a satirist has been made 'morally right' by bullying the social dregs of a douche bag society.

In contrast, true compassion and understanding (What douche bags pretend to be) doesn't need a 'fun house mirror' to point out the flaws in other groups of people no matter how different or even backwards they may be. It makes allowances and can work around or even offer to help fix a problem, rather than just point out exaggerated perceived weakness in others. satirist seek out weakness to one end alone, and that is the exploitation of it.

You're suggestion that writers and cartoonists are worse than the vile fanatics who murder innocent people makes me physically sick, you make my fucking stomach churn.

You're relatively new here. Get used to it. This is what "compassion and understanding" looks like filtered through the prism of Drich's sociopathic 'moral' compass.

[Faith No More]

You should stop talking about satire like you understand the word, Drich.

I know you're incapable of feeling embarrassment, but I feel enough for both of us when I read your posts.

[Brian37]

Soo.. What happen did the pope send modern day templars over to jihad Hebdo offices again?

Or are you D-bags saying that the R/C church does not have the right to complain about being picked on?

I love even the false piety avoiding ad homins, as if we cant figure out what you mean by "D-bags"........ Oh "Dynamic"? "Divine"? Well golly gee Wally cant figure that sh*t out?

Yea they do have the right to bitch, everyone does in a free society, but that does not mean they get to prevent us from offending them. Maybe instead of condemning us, you should think about why we blaspheme them. I am former Catholic, I have seen their forked tongue for ages. Nobody is perfect no, not even atheists, I just hate those who act like their shit don't stink and on top of that cover it up and act like they are perfect.

Nobody stuck a gun to the Pope's head and forced him to apply or be appointed to that position, he is a public figure and his institution is a famous institution. He deserves no taboo any more than an actor or rock star or politician. Part of living in a free society is the scrutiny and blasphemy that comes with it. If you want to live under a government that silences blasphemy try Saudi Arabia.

[Brian37]

Drich, you have been hear for years, if you truly thought we were evil, you wouldn't be here. And you have also been around long enough to know we even go after each other. I think maybe you have forgotten how to treat us as individuals. My mom is still Catholic and I love her. We know how to treat religious people as individuals, but famous people and famous religious institutions are not individuals and as such must be held to scrutiny and even blasphemy. Anything less is a road to censorship and theocracy.

[Drich]

brother, satire is the douche bag form of bullying, only it's not called bullying because douche bags have bann that word. so they came up with 'satire' to describe what by all rights is indeed nothing more than one group bullying another group who is different by mocking a predominate trait of those not in the 'satirical' group/the cool kid group, IN An Excepted Way, By Other Douche Bags. Satirists are not the mirror, they are the kids mocking the one pictured in the mirror, and are allowed to get away with it because they are liked/cool.

What is truly sad of all satirists, that they are, no better than those in whom they hate/mock, and don't even know it. Most of them don't/won't ever see themselves as the monsters they make others out to be. That what makes satire different than bullying. Bullies know that they are doing wrong, a satirist has been made 'morally right' by bullying the social dregs of a douche bag society.

In contrast, true compassion and understanding (What douche bags pretend to be) doesn't need a 'fun house mirror' to point out the flaws in other groups of people no matter how different or even backwards they may be. It makes allowances and can work around or even offer to help fix a problem, rather than just point out exaggerated perceived weakness in others. satirist seek out weakness to one end alone, and that is the exploitation of it.

Your suggestion that writers and cartoonists are worse than the vile fanatics who murder innocent people makes me physically sick, you make my fucking stomach churn.

that feeling is your self righteousness wanting out of your body.. let it fly monkey man let it fly.

Then revisit what I said. I said satirists are BULLIES Not murders, Bullies who are allowed to socially Mock those who do not conform to pop culture.

[Drich]

You're suggestion that writers and cartoonists are worse than the vile fanatics who murder innocent people makes me physically sick, you make my fucking stomach churn.

You're relatively new here. Get used to it. This is what "compassion and understanding" looks like filtered through the prism of Drich's sociopathic 'moral' compass.

No this is me offering to help you 'FIX' you broken compassion and understanding. Got to remember I'm the bad guy. I don't claim to have compassion and understanding I speak in absolutes concerning right and wrong which means I can not be compassionate or understanding by the pop morality standard.. However I can point out the lack of compassion and understanding in those who claim to have an over abundance of it, yet still laugh at those who do not meet the social standard they themselves set.

[Drich]

Drich, you have been hear for years, if you truly thought we were evil, you wouldn't be here. And you have also been around long enough to know we even go after each other. I think maybe you have forgotten how to treat us as individuals. My mom is still Catholic and I love her. We know how to treat religious people as individuals, but famous people and famous religious institutions are not individuals and as such must be held to scrutiny and even blasphemy. Anything less is a road to censorship and theocracy.

Youre right. I don't think you all are.. 'beyond hope for salvation,' and it is why I remain here. That is why I intentionally did not and generally do not speak about individual or their specific traits. I speak of traits in general or sin in general and allow the reader apply them if the shoe fits. If I say D-bags do "x" and "x" does not apply then know I am not speaking to or about you or something that you do..

[Drich]

Soo.. What happen did the pope send modern day templars over to jihad Hebdo offices again?

Or are you D-bags saying that the R/C church does not have the right to complain about being picked on?

I love even the false piety avoiding ad homins, as if we cant figure out what you mean by "D-bags"........ Oh "Dynamic"? "Divine"? Well golly gee Wally cant figure that sh*t out?

Yea they do have the right to bitch, everyone does in a free society, but that does not mean they get to prevent us from offending them. Maybe instead of condemning us, you should think about why we blaspheme them. I am former Catholic, I have seen their forked tongue for ages. Nobody is perfect no, not even atheists, I just hate those who act like their shit don't stink and on top of that cover it up and act like they are perfect.

Nobody stuck a gun to the Pope's head and forced him to apply or be appointed to that position, he is a public figure and his institution is a famous institution. He deserves no taboo any more than an actor or rock star or politician. Part of living in a free society is the scrutiny and blasphemy that comes with it. If you want to live under a government that silences blasphemy try Saudi Arabia.

I'm not saying the pope or mo-hammie nor anyone else deserves any special status. I'm just point out the hyprocrisy of the satirist and the devoted fan who think they are any better than the social group they are bullying.

[Cyberman]

And by using the satirical term "mo-hammie", you illustrate the hypocrisy in your opinion. Well played.

[Drich]

And by using the satirical term "mo-hammie", you illustrate the hypocrisy in your opinion. Well played.

Again... I'm the bad guy here stimbo. I do not claim to be all compassionate and understanding. I by the doings of my religion, must speak to rights and wrongs as defined by what I believe. In turn I am also obligated to identify false teachers and Not hold them in special regard. By doing so i am fully aware and accept the bigotted titles pop culture may want to assign us and wear them proudly.

I don't pretend to be something that I am not, unlike hypocrite d-bags who preach compassion and understand of everyone, except those who can be made fun of in brutal and highly offensive ways, because they are judged as non-compliant of pop morality.

Intolerance of the 'intolerant' is a hallmark of bigotry and hate the word over, even if it is repackaged as 'satire.'