Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 28, 2024, 7:21 pm
Thread Rating:
|
What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
|
 (February 16, 2016 at 11:16 pm)Emjay Wrote:(February 16, 2016 at 10:49 pm)MTL Wrote: Sounds like a take on the old movie, "Willard". I've never seen Joe's Apartment, but it sounds pretty good. "Willard" was very dark. 
Just saw this somewhere:
"Prove to me God doesn't exist" LOL !! The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
 
One we've had recently is, "We'll see who is right when we're dead."
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum  (February 17, 2016 at 1:02 pm)robvalue Wrote: One we've had recently is, "We'll see who is right when we're dead." To which which I always reply "No, we won't. We'll be dead."
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
The fact that so many theists believe any of the philosophical arguments are compelling, is pretty lame.
Ontological, teleological, cosmological, transcendental, or whatever else they parade around. I repeat, pretty lame. You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence. 
Someone actually told me "Hey if you pray on it, you'll see God is real." Um…what?
 RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 17, 2016 at 7:54 pm
(This post was last modified: February 17, 2016 at 7:56 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
I have my own personal candidate for a worst argument for God's existence, created by my very own turtley self:
Hypothetical idiotic theist who is super duper pooper-scooper serial and serious, for real-zees Wrote:Hey, God must be real because I saw him. I saw him with my very own eyes. I know he's supposed to be invisible but shut up. I saw him. I saw He who is the Jesusy guy's father and also himself. I saw him sucking donkey balls. And to see He Who Sucks Donkey Balls, it requires that I first see Him, and to see Him requires that He exists for me to see Him. For me to see He Who Sucks Donkey Balls, that is. I saw our Donkey-Ballsucking Father. I saw him and he is real. And he sucks. Balls. Donkey ones. It's kind of a shitty argument. (February 17, 2016 at 7:54 pm)Evie Wrote: I have my own personal candidate for a worst argument for God's existence, created by my very own turtley self: I can't prove that you didn't see God sucking donkey balls. Checkmate atheists! You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Ah yes, I remember... the film was based on an MTV video (I think).
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
