Boin-ney, did I say it right?

[downbeatplumb]

Education is not only about jobs, learning can be an end all on its own.

[Drich]

Did the original poster really say that the work force would be ruined if too many people got a better education?  OMG, oh no, so many college graduates out there, no one will work at WALLMART anymore!  lol.

Only a True Christian ™ would actually complain about educating the populace for free.

Bah, plenty of people will still not bother to get an advanced education even if we give it away.  It takes more than money.  It takes desire and hard work.  Many people will still skip it and go straight into a trade, or settle for simpler jobs.  What a stupid fear, too much education. Bah.

oh, my glob..

You really cant be this dense, unless you are one of those 'trade school/simpler people' pretending to be 'Sm-aught.'

Again if everyone gets educated with a bachelors, then that degree has no value. it becomes what a high school diploma is now.

Tell me you still don't see the problem?

I know you don't so I will spell it out for you again!

It's the COST. Yes it's free to the student, but it will indeed cost the government, ultimately the tax payer a sh*t load of money to send people to school to advance their 'educations' just to put them in a marketable employment position of a current high school graduate.

Which makes the new gold standard a masters or doctorate... So then is boin-ey going to raise taxes again to pay for the new master/high school diploma people will need to get a min wage job?

Not only that who is he going to raise taxes on if those with money decide to keep it and leave?

[Drich]

[Minimalist]

Education has it's place, but it is not for everyone.

You're living proof of that, drippy.

[The Grand Nudger]

My previous, quoted, response serves equally well as a response to your latest post Drich. If you want to have a discussion you'll have to come to the table.

[Drich]

You don't think that those college degrees will lead to job creation?  You assume that there will always be only so many marbles in the jar and that this number is forever described by a hypothetical snapshot in time of your choosing?

Why would it lead to job creation? More specifically In essence the Sanders plan is just taking away the individual responsibility and burden of paying for a 4 year degree from the student and placing it on everyone else. Which will entice many more to earn their degree. How does flooding a saturated job market with more similarly qualified people create more jobs? those with the capacity to create jobs will do so with or without an over saturation of the job market. so how does over saturation magically equal more jobs?

[The Grand Nudger]

It's not up to me to imagine the ways, your comments require that it won't, period.  It's your baby, you wipe it's shitty ass.  I'm merely looking for some clarification as to whether or not this is your position. Seems to me, in that response above, you may have run afoul of several poor inferences and bad form, regardless.

[Drich]

[Drich]

So let me get this straight... 7 pages and not one of you is willing to attempt to explain how Boin-ney's plan is actually going to work?

Aren't you all supporting this guy? How/why are you supporting what you don't understand/Can't explain let alone willing to defend?

I am asking for simple clarity can no one provide it?

[Minimalist]

Aren't you all supporting this guy?

No.  In fact I already early-voted for Clinton.