Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 4:04 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Free Will -- the "materialist string" pulls both ways.
#11
RE: Free Will -- the "materialist string" pulls both ways.
(April 3, 2016 at 11:13 am)Jehanne Wrote:
(April 3, 2016 at 11:02 am)pool the great Wrote: Then I guess it's a good thing I haven't undertaken that surgery so that I still poses my free will.

I didn't post this thread to argue that, rather, my point is that people like you are good people and that you have no choice but to be good.

I can be just as bad as I'm good. Wink
I always have a choice.
Reply
#12
RE: Free Will -- the "materialist string" pulls both ways.
(April 3, 2016 at 11:24 am)pool the great Wrote:
(April 3, 2016 at 11:13 am)Jehanne Wrote: I didn't post this thread to argue that, rather, my point is that people like you are good people and that you have no choice but to be good.

I can be just as bad as I'm good. Wink
I always have a choice.

I would argue that you don't; rather, I would argue that you are incapable of doing evil things, such as robbing banks, kidnapping little children, torturing animals, etc.  I would cite as evidence the fact that individuals who do such things, without exception, have deficiencies within their brains and/or past environments which has a direct and discernible causal link with their present behavior.  These correlates can be demonstrated using statistical methods.
Reply
#13
RE: Free Will -- the "materialist string" pulls both ways.
I believe I have free will. It's limited, not absolute, but I believe I have it.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#14
RE: Free Will -- the "materialist string" pulls both ways.
(April 3, 2016 at 10:45 am)pool the great Wrote:
(April 3, 2016 at 10:39 am)RozKek Wrote: Too bad to what? It has made no difference in my life.

It made a huge difference in my life.

Well it was unfortunate for you then.

I don't depend on free will to have a good life.

(April 3, 2016 at 12:31 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: I believe I have free will. It's limited, not absolute, but I believe I have it.

This is what I'm uncertain about. I know for a fact I don't have absolute free will i.e I know I'm not 100% independent on external stimuli. But at the same time I don't know if I'm 100% dependent on external stimuli.
Reply
#15
RE: Free Will -- the "materialist string" pulls both ways.
(April 3, 2016 at 1:16 pm)RozKek Wrote: This is what I'm uncertain about. I know for a fact I don't have absolute free will i.e I know I'm not 100% independent on external stimuli. But at the same time I don't know if I'm 100% dependent on external stimuli.

Isn't the amount of your dependence or independence variable on a case by case basis. Mine is. My amount is on a sliding scale depending on the situation.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#16
RE: Free Will -- the "materialist string" pulls both ways.
(April 3, 2016 at 12:31 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: I believe I have free will. It's limited, not absolute, but I believe I have it.

At a minimum it is a useful illusion, kind of like a stationary Earth with respect to a moving Cosmos.
Reply
#17
RE: Free Will -- the "materialist string" pulls both ways.
I dunno what all that rambling about children growing up in loving homes is, I didn't bother reading it. What I do agree with is the part about all human beings basically not having free will, or to what I see it as having the illusion of free will, basically being bound to the laws of nature. I think it's funny to think about how there's nihilistic parts of my brain in particular, which say make me feel depressed about life in general having no meaning. I've gotten over that in general and it's not that I'm bringing it up to say I have a problem with that, what I'm saying is it's funny that our brain works as a computer in a way that will start rebelling against life itself. It says, hey there's something wrong here, I can't seem to find a point to any of this and then it will start making you feel sad and there's not really a way to fix it, except to say hey I'm just gonna live for the "lyricism" of life.

I think to add to what you said, I also believe that there's really no such thing as a good or bad person. Seeing as how we're all products of fundamental physical laws and not some divine highly purposed system, which is a highly flawed way of thinking, nothing really holds anyone accountable except for people realizing that being a good person, astoundingly, increases the quality of their life. Unless they lack empathy or the ability to care about such things, but that's beside the point and has to do with what I said earlier, it's just the nature of human beings which is by extension the laws of nature itself. If you think human beings are bad, well you must think that the whole universe is bad because we're all bound by the continuum of time and space and the laws of physics, inside of our brains as well. That's one of the most disturbing things to me about religion, which is of course endlessly disturbing in just about any way you could possibly imagine, but there always seems to be something leading to some sort of conclusion like that, and rightfully so.
Reply
#18
RE: Free Will -- the "materialist string" pulls both ways.
(April 3, 2016 at 3:04 pm)Phosphorescent Panties Wrote: I dunno what all that rambling about children growing up in loving homes is, I didn't bother reading it. What I do agree with is the part about all human beings basically not having free will, or to what I see it as having the illusion of free will, basically being bound to the laws of nature. I think it's funny to think about how there's nihilistic parts of my brain in particular, which say make me feel depressed about life in general having no meaning. I've gotten over that in general and it's not that I'm bringing it up to say I have a problem with that, what I'm saying is it's funny that our brain works as a computer in a way that will start rebelling against life itself. It says, hey there's something wrong here, I can't seem to find a point to any of this and then it will start making you feel sad and there's not really a way to fix it, except to say hey I'm just gonna live for the "lyricism" of life.

I think to add to what you said, I also believe that there's really no such thing as a good or bad person. Seeing as how we're all products of fundamental physical laws and not some divine highly purposed system, which is a highly flawed way of thinking, nothing really holds anyone accountable except for people realizing that being a good person, astoundingly, increases the quality of their life. Unless they lack empathy or the ability to care about such things, but that's beside the point and has to do with what I said earlier, it's just the nature of human beings which is by extension the laws of nature itself. If you think human beings are bad, well you must think that the whole universe is bad because we're all bound by the continuum of time and space and the laws of physics, inside of our brains as well. That's one of the most disturbing things to me about religion, which is of course endlessly disturbing in just about any way you could possibly imagine, but there always seems to be something leading to some sort of conclusion like that, and rightfully so.

It was only a paragraph long, hardly what most would call a "rambling".  (I think that you need at least two paragraphs for that!)  Now, if you can read 300 words per minute, you could have read my OP in under a minute, far less time than you took to write your two paragraphs, which, by the way, I read in their entirety.
Reply
#19
RE: Free Will -- the "materialist string" pulls both ways.
(April 3, 2016 at 3:08 pm)Jehanne Wrote:
(April 3, 2016 at 3:04 pm)Phosphorescent Panties Wrote: I dunno what all that rambling about children growing up in loving homes is, I didn't bother reading it. What I do agree with is the part about all human beings basically not having free will, or to what I see it as having the illusion of free will, basically being bound to the laws of nature. I think it's funny to think about how there's nihilistic parts of my brain in particular, which say make me feel depressed about life in general having no meaning. I've gotten over that in general and it's not that I'm bringing it up to say I have a problem with that, what I'm saying is it's funny that our brain works as a computer in a way that will start rebelling against life itself. It says, hey there's something wrong here, I can't seem to find a point to any of this and then it will start making you feel sad and there's not really a way to fix it, except to say hey I'm just gonna live for the "lyricism" of life.

I think to add to what you said, I also believe that there's really no such thing as a good or bad person. Seeing as how we're all products of fundamental physical laws and not some divine highly purposed system, which is a highly flawed way of thinking, nothing really holds anyone accountable except for people realizing that being a good person, astoundingly, increases the quality of their life. Unless they lack empathy or the ability to care about such things, but that's beside the point and has to do with what I said earlier, it's just the nature of human beings which is by extension the laws of nature itself. If you think human beings are bad, well you must think that the whole universe is bad because we're all bound by the continuum of time and space and the laws of physics, inside of our brains as well. That's one of the most disturbing things to me about religion, which is of course endlessly disturbing in just about any way you could possibly imagine, but there always seems to be something leading to some sort of conclusion like that, and rightfully so.

It was only a paragraph long, hardly what most would call a "rambling".  (I think that you need at least two paragraphs for that!)  Now, if you can read 300 words per minute, you could have read my OP in under a minute, far less time than you took to write your two paragraphs, which, by the way, I read in their entirety.
Calm down dearest, I wasn't meaning to be critical. I'm just lazy and I suppose what I said did sound critical, all I meant was that I didn't really have the patience to read it.
Reply
#20
RE: Free Will -- the "materialist string" pulls both ways.
I felt I had to respond to this thread. But I don't know why.
I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are god and religion ways of saying "screw you" to nature? ShinyCrystals 18 779 January 8, 2024 at 12:27 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Amending my Good and Kindly ways The Valkyrie 27 5015 September 12, 2017 at 7:49 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  I'm sick of hearing about the "Five Ways"! Asmodee 46 7624 January 19, 2017 at 3:27 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  Ways to introduce people to Atheism? Veritas 24 5048 December 24, 2015 at 1:20 am
Last Post: ErGingerbreadMandude
  is there anyone else who has beliefs that are both conservative and liberal? leodeo 15 5578 March 7, 2014 at 10:04 am
Last Post: Bittersmart
  Questions for both sides. Justcurious 42 9851 January 24, 2013 at 12:31 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  How many ways can I fuck up my life? Gambit 11 4356 August 2, 2012 at 11:50 pm
Last Post: Gambit
  Both groups feel the other side is dishonest? Mystic 27 10712 July 18, 2012 at 6:43 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Best ways to discuss religion: logical arguments? JesusShaves 20 9720 May 16, 2012 at 2:40 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Top Seven Ways Christianity is Debunked By the Sciences Justtristo 128 42537 September 30, 2011 at 6:53 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)