Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 19, 2016 at 7:33 pm
(May 19, 2016 at 6:57 pm)AAA Wrote: (May 19, 2016 at 6:42 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Yes, he used the phrase "gives the appearance" for a reason.
http://www.richannel.org/christmas-lectu...id-objects
Yeah, he thinks they appear designed. Obviously he sees design, but thinks it is the result of mutation and natural selection.
No, he speaks of the appearance of design being erroneous. IIRC, in one of the lectures I linked Douglas Adams reads his famous "intelligent puddle" piece to that very point.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 46384
Threads: 540
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 19, 2016 at 7:46 pm
We had a smallish orchard on the farm where I grew up. After a fairly fierce windstorm, my brothers and I were doing clean-up, when one of them pointed out that some of the apples on the group formed a pattern that looked not completely unlike a bird.
While it may appear that the tree was clever enough to drop the apples into a shape somewhat resembling a bird, I don't think any sane person would argue that such was actually the case.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 46384
Threads: 540
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 19, 2016 at 7:49 pm
(May 19, 2016 at 7:09 pm)AAA Wrote: (May 19, 2016 at 7:01 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Think, really, really hard about the word 'appear'. Biological systems 'appear' designed in precisely the same way that a stage magician can 'appear' to saw a woman in half.
Boru
That's just an assertion. Maybe they appear designed the way a person genuinely getting chopped in half appears to be chopped in half. Why do we have to assume biological systems are counter-intuitive?
Because MOST things in science are counter-intuitive. Until Galileo dropped a cannon ball and a bullet from the same height, it was perfectly intuitive that a heavy cannon ball would fall faster than a light bullet. The fact that they fall at the same rate (negating air resistance) is counter-intuitive. That's how science works.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 301
Threads: 1
Joined: January 22, 2015
Reputation:
7
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 19, 2016 at 8:19 pm
(May 19, 2016 at 1:25 pm)AAA Wrote: The more we find out about how the universe and living systems work, the more it seems purposefully designed.
That is false.
I assume you'll agree that there is a strong tendency for highly educated people to know more about how things work.
There is also a significant tendency for those who are highly educated about the universe and living systems to be atheists.
So, it seems that finding out about how the universe and living systems work creates the opposite impression: It tends to persuade people that the universe is not purposefully designed.
Posts: 301
Threads: 1
Joined: January 22, 2015
Reputation:
7
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 19, 2016 at 8:21 pm
(May 19, 2016 at 2:37 pm)AAA Wrote: ... but biologists agree that it was designed.
Nonsense. You made that up.
Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 19, 2016 at 8:24 pm
(May 19, 2016 at 5:32 pm)AAA Wrote: (May 19, 2016 at 4:01 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: ![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/6l50mKJvRq6t2/giphy.gif)
Well Richard Dawkins thinks it was designed, just by an undirected process of mutation and natural selection. What do you think then? Are living systems not designed? Do you just object to the word design, because that's what Dawkins uses. I think I've heard Shermer say this as well. Is natural selection not ultimately a designing force?
![[Image: 4055690-1093655963-Ricky.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=static1.comicvine.com%2Fuploads%2Fscale_medium%2F11113%2F111130700%2F4055690-1093655963-Ricky.gif)
![[Image: Ricky-Gervais-Hysterical-Laughter.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn2.crushable.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F06%2FRicky-Gervais-Hysterical-Laughter.gif)
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
Posts: 3637
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation:
47
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 19, 2016 at 8:35 pm
(May 19, 2016 at 7:14 pm)AAA Wrote: (May 19, 2016 at 7:11 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: You might be better off sticking to what someone does say, rather than what your fevered mind imagines the might say.
Oh, and equivocate less. It's dishonest.
Ok, forget about Dawkins then. Do you think that natural selection is a designing force?
Nope.
Changes happen. Those changes that afford a survival advantage get passed to offspring. Those changes that do not, get weeded out of the population.
There is no design.
Only survival advantages.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
151
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 19, 2016 at 8:54 pm
(This post was last modified: May 20, 2016 at 9:42 am by Whateverist.)
(May 18, 2016 at 12:31 pm)SteveII Wrote: However, there are a bunch of problems with this philosophy so most atheists' arguments aren't very sophisticated.
I've just never felt compelled to justify why I don't believe in such a grandly fantastic thing as the Christian god. I don't see where sophistication on my part could find any purchase here.
On the other hand I do think a robust accounting of the phenomenon of god belief generally is important to understanding our species. You won't find me dismissive on that topic. Of course my own attempt at accounting for god belief is entirely natural, as it must be since I don't acknowledge the need of a separate category for 'supernatural' things.
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 19, 2016 at 9:01 pm
(May 19, 2016 at 1:25 pm)AAA Wrote: (May 19, 2016 at 12:11 pm)Constable Dorfl Wrote: The words of a true fantasist, a person who far prefers to live in the inside of his head rather than the real world.
Steve, the only reason that you want to remove science from any possibility of having an answer to the god question is because (subconsciously at least) you've realised that the more we find out scientifically the more remote the possibility of god becomes.
That is hardly the case. The more we find out about how the universe and living systems work, the more it seems purposefully designed.
Seriously, AAA? You're seriously back to try and argue in favor of design on this forum for the THIRD FUCKING time now? After you have had your ass handed to you twice now? After every one of your false inferences about evolution have been patiently explained to you by people who understand it better then you do? God, you're like a fucking ROBOT. You REFUSE to learn. Go away! I hate how much of our valuable members' time you fucking waste here.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 624
Threads: 1
Joined: December 4, 2015
Reputation:
1
RE: Atheism vs. God's Existence
May 19, 2016 at 10:09 pm
(May 19, 2016 at 7:49 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (May 19, 2016 at 7:09 pm)AAA Wrote: That's just an assertion. Maybe they appear designed the way a person genuinely getting chopped in half appears to be chopped in half. Why do we have to assume biological systems are counter-intuitive?
Because MOST things in science are counter-intuitive. Until Galileo dropped a cannon ball and a bullet from the same height, it was perfectly intuitive that a heavy cannon ball would fall faster than a light bullet. The fact that they fall at the same rate (negating air resistance) is counter-intuitive. That's how science works.
Boru
Most things aren't counter-intuitive, but a lot are. If it is counter-intuitive, it has to be demonstrated to be. Mutation and natural selection has not been shown to be sufficient to account for the complexity of living systems. So why not assume it is not counter intuitive until shown to be? Or why not have people approach it from multiple perspectives so we are more likely to test it thoroughly?
|
