Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 11:24 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Problem of good and evil for an atheist
#11
RE: Problem of good and evil for an atheist
Killing Hitler would not have prevented the Second World War which was pretty much inevitable as a brought on by the growing economic and nationalistic factors of the time. In all likelihood another perhaps more successful leader would have risen to replace him (someone who would have made less mistakes and possibly won the second world war), his ideas where shared by many at the time.
Reply
#12
RE: Problem of good and evil for an atheist
Quote:Killing a baby, an innocent baby for any reason is evil. (please dont derail this thread with attacking the Bible)


We don't have to. You just did it for us. Thanks.

Quote: Slay utterly old [and] young, both maids, and little children, and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] the mark; and begin at my sanctuary. Then they began at the ancient men which [were] before the house.

Ezekiel 9:6

This is not an "attack" on your bible. This is what is in your fucking bible. Apparently, baby killing is okay with god at times so it is outside of your assertion that killing one is "evil."

Now, by all means, let the apologetics flow like a river!
Reply
#13
RE: Problem of good and evil for an atheist
(August 13, 2010 at 3:29 pm)darkwolf176 Wrote: Killing Hitler would not have prevented the Second World War which was pretty much inevitable as a brought on by the growing economic and nationalistic factors of the time. In all likelihood another perhaps more successful leader would have risen to replace him (someone who would have made less mistakes and possibly won the second world war), his ideas where shared by many at the time.

And, from what I've read, it seems that Hitler himself was not directly responsible for the details of many of the atrocities his nation committed. According to Ian Kershaw, it seems that Hitler's main methods were to give vague instructions to his followers and have them hammer out the details, and he'd reward the one he'd like the most. For instance, he'd probably have said something like, "Heydrich and Himmler, try and figure out a way to take care of the Jews of Europe once and for all," and they'd come up with plans for concentration camps with built-in gas chambers and a crematorium that can handle up to 4000 bodies daily.

Oh, and while we're on the subject of Baby-killing and the Bible, here's Hosea 13:16 (Amplified Version)
Samaria shall bear her guilt and become desolate, for she rebelled against her God; they shall fall by the sword, their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their pregnant women shall be ripped up.

Or Better yet, Psalm 137 (also Amplified):
1BY THE rivers of Babylon, there we [captives] sat down, yes, we wept when we [earnestly] remembered Zion [the city of our God imprinted on our hearts].
2On the willow trees in the midst of [Babylon] we hung our harps.
3For there they who led us captive required of us a song with words, and our tormentors and they who wasted us required of us mirth, saying, Sing us one of the songs of Zion.
4How shall we sing the Lord's song in a strange land?
5If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its skill [with the harp].
6Let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth if I remember you not, if I prefer not Jerusalem above my chief joy!(A)
7Remember, O Lord, against the Edomites, that they said in the day of Jerusalem's fall, Down, down to the ground with her!
8O Daughter of Babylon [you devastator, you!], who [ought to be and] shall be destroyed, happy and blessed shall he be who requites you as you have served us.(B)
9Happy and blessed shall he be who takes and dashes your little ones against the rock!
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Reply
#14
RE: Problem of good and evil for an atheist
Yep.

[Image: god_is_prochoice_miscarriage.jpg]
Reply
#15
RE: Problem of good and evil for an atheist
See Min, we I make that point to the godbots, it makes them all huffy. Makes me laugh, but they sure do get huffy.
Nothing is your own except the few cubic centimeters inside your skull. - George Orwell
Reply
#16
RE: Problem of good and evil for an atheist
Their sky-daddy tells them to be huffy.
Reply
#17
RE: Problem of good and evil for an atheist
(August 13, 2010 at 2:58 am)solja247 Wrote: Whether you like it or not. There ARE things which are absolutely evil and things which are absolutely good.
I know most atheists atempt to discredit this idea (There is a huge problem if there is such thing).
Absolutes aren't. We abhor killing baby humans because they're babies of our species. Humans also trigger that emotion in things that remind us of babies, extending to the 'cuteness' of other species as well, including dogs, cats, apes, horses, and so forth.
But do you feel guilty for murdering baby ants? Baby spiders? Baby anything that isn't 'cute'?
Have you ever eaten veal? What about children that you've killed indirectly through purchasing goods from companies who severely damage the environment and becomes responsible for murdering vast tracks of wildlife and ruining the families of everyone whose livelyhood depends on there being a stable ecosystem? (You know, like BP, but there are plenty of other examples).

(August 13, 2010 at 2:58 am)solja247 Wrote: Since we are the only creature on this planet, who has the ability to do evil and good and not just to respond to external stimuli. This notion of good and evil had to come from somewhere.
Evolutionarily speaking why should I care if a child was killed in Africa?
There is no natural explanation for the concept of good and evil. So where did it come from?
I personally think it came from a cosmological battle between good and evil, although I cant conclude and prove that it, it explains things much better than anything else.

It came from us. It couldn't have come from anywhere else. Evolution isn't an outlook on life. It's not a system of morals or beliefs - it's a process by which life can diversify.
If today you can take a thing like evolution and make it a crime to teach in the public schools, tomorrow you can make it a crime to teach it in the private schools and next year you can make it a crime to teach it to the hustings or in the church. At the next session you may ban books and the newspapers...
Ignorance and fanaticism are ever busy and need feeding. Always feeding and gloating for more. Today it is the public school teachers; tomorrow the private. The next day the preachers and the lecturers, the magazines, the books, the newspapers. After a while, Your Honor, it is the setting of man against man and creed against creed until with flying banners and beating drums we are marching backward to the glorious ages of the sixteenth centry when bigots lighted fagots to burn the men who dared to bring any intelligence and enlightenment and culture to the human mind. ~Clarence Darrow, at the Scopes Monkey Trial, 1925

Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first. ~Ronald Reagan
Reply
#18
RE: Problem of good and evil for an atheist
Reply
#19
RE: Problem of good and evil for an atheist



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#20
RE: Problem of good and evil for an atheist
Morality, if I can chip in with my view, is an ongoing debate within society about how to prioritise people's interests, which include their pre-existing moral beliefs. Some things we worked out ages ago; societies can't exist if everyone is allowed to rape, murder and steal on a whim. Other things vary wildly from culture to culture. Still, I believe that we can claim the existence of an objective moral standard (like, for instance, going against a person's wishes, unless not doing so goes against more people's wishes, is bad). This is not because of some supernatural command, but because of our compassion, our ability to reason and our need to decide what we can allow and what we can't.
'We must respect the other fellow's religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart.' H.L. Mencken

'False religion' is the ultimate tautology.

'It is just like man's vanity and impertinence to call an animal dumb because it is dumb to his dull perceptions.' Mark Twain

'I care not much for a man's religion whose dog and cat are not the better for it.' Abraham Lincoln
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Life is meaningless and why that's a good thing. Twiggy 22 2139 July 13, 2026 at 2:48 pm
Last Post: emjay
  Are cats evil beasts that should be killed to save mice? FlatAssembler 34 8569 November 28, 2022 at 11:41 am
Last Post: Fireball
  does evil exist? Quill01 51 13886 November 15, 2022 at 5:30 am
Last Post: h4ym4n
  Emotions are intrinsically good and bad Transcended Dimensions 713 243584 February 25, 2018 at 11:32 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Trolley Problem/Consistency in Ethics vulcanlogician 150 47230 January 30, 2018 at 11:01 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  The argument against "evil", theists please come to the defense. Mystic 158 100419 December 29, 2017 at 7:21 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  One sentence that throws the problem of evil out of the window. Mystic 473 149780 November 12, 2017 at 7:57 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Reasoning showing homosexuality is evil. Mystic 315 107453 October 23, 2017 at 12:34 pm
Last Post: Kitan Etos
  Reasoning showing that heterosexuality is evil I_am_not_mafia 21 8928 October 23, 2017 at 8:23 am
Last Post: ignoramus
Wink Emoticons are Intrinsically Good and Evil Fireball 4 2396 October 21, 2017 at 12:11 am
Last Post: Succubus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)