Is Melania Trump a Mail Order Bride?

[Homeless Nutter]

I don't think so. I think everything is relevant for a candidacy.

Even if that was true - and I'm not saying it isn't - there are levels of relevance. Politicians, especially for the highest positions - should be elected on the basis of their policies, and secondly on ability to function as a diplomat - personal quirks and ability to create drama fall way down on the priority list. And of course we already KNOW, that Trump's policies are a train-wreck and his diplomatic abilities end at scaring simple people and insulting anyone he thinks is smarter than him. At this point it barely matters what he sticks his d*ck into. Sure - a bimbo, who can barely speak English would make a poor excuse for a First Lady, but if Trump is elected - it will be the least of anyone's worries.

This is the problem with democracy - vast majority of people treat the elections as some sort of soap opera, a cheesy spectacle to the characters of which they can relate and emotionally part-take in their successes and failures. Of course - another problem is that many voters expect what should be a relatively simple procedure of selecting a governmental official, to be the cure-all for all that ails them, which is just infantile level of naivety...

The point is - if this mail order bride thing turns out to be true, we'll likely hear about it from more credible sources than some random spam on the forum. And even then it will barely matter, because if Trump can be the President of USA - then a deflated plastic f*ckdoll can be First Lady, for all the difference, that it makes.

[rexbeccarox]

So let me see. This person is telling us he wrote the article himself and I, for one, found it interesting. Were anyone else to post this this would actually get a lot of discussion.

But, wait, no, I see. I didn't see the person is christian. Ohhh, I get it now. 'Cause fuck all christians, they must have bad intentions, fuck this thread, let me criticize the OP for nothing at all.

You people make me chuckle.

Though it's questionable enough that, as a Christian, he would go to an atheist forum, copy and paste to get around the 30/30 rule, and post something about politics as his first-ever "contribution", I question his intentions because the grammar and syntax are horrendous, he posted no intro, and no actual purpose as to why he came here of all places to post an article he supposedly wrote, self-promoting as a total unknown to the forum. "Nothing at all"? Please!

Plus, people have been discussing the topic of the thread; the consensus has been a fairly-resounding "who cares?"

[CapnAwesome]

I know he wants to kick all the immigrants out which automatically makes him fanciable to you, but "a lot better looking" really is a stretch.

Tbh they're politicians, they're all old wrinkly men.

None of them are even decent looking, maybe save for Obama, Nick Klegg and the (actually gorgeous) president of Mexico whose name I always forget.

C'mon, Mitt Romney is the most handsome 70 year old man on the planet.

[Excited Penguin]

So let me see. This person is telling us he wrote the article himself and I, for one, found it interesting. Were anyone else to post this this would actually get a lot of discussion.

But, wait, no, I see. I didn't see the person is christian. Ohhh, I get it now. 'Cause fuck all christians, they must have bad intentions, fuck this thread, let me criticize the OP for nothing at all.

You people make me chuckle.

Though it's questionable enough that, as a Christian, he would go to an atheist forum, copy and paste to get around the 30/30 rule, and post something about politics as his first-ever "contribution", I question his intentions because the grammar and syntax are horrendous, he posted no intro, and no actual purpose as to why he came here of all places to post an article he supposedly wrote, self-promoting as a total unknown to the forum. "Nothing at all"? Please!

Plus, people have been discussing the topic of the thread; the consensus has been a fairly-resounding "who cares?"

You're probably right, but a couple of things. We shouldn't so much care about the poster as we should for the post. He didn't break any rules, so I don't see what people's problems are. Also, he either copy-pasted an article or wrote it himself, you have to decide on one thing, you can't suspect him of both at once.

He didn't spam some nonsense. He talked about Trump, a very popular subject on the forums. I don't see what the problem is.

[rexbeccarox]

Though it's questionable enough that, as a Christian, he would go to an atheist forum, copy and paste to get around the 30/30 rule, and post something about politics as his first-ever "contribution", I question his intentions because the grammar and syntax are horrendous, he posted no intro, and no actual purpose as to why he came here of all places to post an article he supposedly wrote, self-promoting as a total unknown to the forum. "Nothing at all"? Please!

Plus, people have been discussing the topic of the thread; the consensus has been a fairly-resounding "who cares?"

You're probably right, but a couple of things. We shouldn't so much care about the poster as we should for the post. He didn't break any rules, so I don't see what people's problems are. Also, he either copy-pasted an article or wrote it himself, you have to decide on one thing, you can't suspect him of both at once.

He didn't spam some nonsense. He talked about Trump, a very popular subject on the forums. I don't see what the problem is.

He did spam, though. He hit and run just about every forum he could find, copied and pasted all over the place, whether he wrote it or not, and spamming is against the rules.

Please tell me you're not going back to being argumentative for argument's sake. It's really silly. I don't have to decide anything, and I can suspect him of whatever I want. Please don't tell me what to do.

[Joods]

Damn.... google came back with 131 results on that.

I'd say that's spamming. Deep spammage and should be considered as such regardless of who did it.

[Excited Penguin]

You're probably right, but a couple of things. We shouldn't so much care about the poster as we should for the post. He didn't break any rules, so I don't see what people's problems are. Also, he either copy-pasted an article or wrote it himself, you have to decide on one thing, you can't suspect him of both at once.

He didn't spam some nonsense. He talked about Trump, a very popular subject on the forums. I don't see what the problem is.

He did spam, though. He hit and run just about every forum he could find, copied and pasted all over the place, whether he wrote it or not, and spamming is against the rules.

Please tell me you're not going back to being argumentative for argument's sake. It's really silly. I don't have to decide anything, and I can suspect him of whatever I want. Please don't tell me what to do.

I wasn't trying to be argumentative for shits and giggles.

I wasn't telling you what to do, that's a ridiculous notion - I don't know what further to say about that.

I agree with everything else you just said, but you're too quick to accuse me of things. I thought we were merely having a conversation. I'm quick to aknowledge when I see that I am wrong, there's no need to think I'm obstinately trying to disagree with people on principle.

That being said, I'm really sorry if I gave a different impression. I need to work on how I come across sometimes.

[vorlon13]

I'd like to throw a little respect towards the True Christians in regards to The Donald, I think we should not recognize marriages subsequent to his first, since JESUS DOESN'T, and have the congress acknowledge Ivana as the 'True' First Lady should Trump win. Trump and Ivana can lead separate lives for all I care, but I strongly feel Ivana should be allowed to live at 1600 Pennsylvania, and to carry out all duties as the 'True' First Lady of the United States, and it would follow, the subsequent 'spouses' to Ivana would not have any staff, Secret Service protection, or any acknowledgement at all beyond the OBVIOUS FACT they are Trumps concubines.

Not sure what kind of 'blue laws' are still on the books in Washington D.C., but if it turns out there are still laws on the book regarding adultery, cohabitation, concubinage, etc, I think enforcement needs to start at the top. Additionally, anywhere in the US Trump travels there will need to be a vetting process to make sure his poonhounding is not contravening any local ordinances.


OK, True Christians, here's your olive branch from this atheist, so lets get moving on this, after all, we have to do it to protect the children, lest they get funny ideas about what God's Holy ordinance decrees for ONE man, ONE woman, ONCE Christian marriage.

Praise Jesus !!!

[Regina]

I know he wants to kick all the immigrants out which automatically makes him fanciable to you, but "a lot better looking" really is a stretch.

Tbh they're politicians, they're all old wrinkly men.

None of them are even decent looking, maybe save for Obama, Nick Klegg and the (actually gorgeous) president of Mexico whose name I always forget.

C'mon, Mitt Romney is the most handsome 70 year old man on the planet.

Decent for a 70 year old, but no :p haha

If I came across him I might just flirt anyway to make him uncomfortable.

[account_inactive]

He did spam, though. He hit and run just about every forum he could find, copied and pasted all over the place, whether he wrote it or not, and spamming is against the rules.

Please tell me you're not going back to being argumentative for argument's sake. It's really silly. I don't have to decide anything, and I can suspect him of whatever I want. Please don't tell me what to do.

I wasn't trying to be argumentative for shits and giggles.

I wasn't telling you what to do, that's a ridiculous notion - I don't know what further to say about that.

I agree with everything else you just said, but you're too quick to accuse me of things. I thought we were merely having a conversation. I'm quick to aknowledge when I see that I am wrong, there's no need to think I'm obstinately trying to disagree with people on principle.

That being said, I'm really sorry if I gave a different impression. I need to work on how I come across sometimes.

Wow, he even hit the forum I used to hang around on.

Woops..quoted the wrong person. Oh well.