Lust, sex, random thought

[The Grand Nudger]

I'm just trying to keep it real.  The majority of sexing females in the US, at this very moment, have hpv (we don;t know with regards to the males, it doesn't present the same way - we assume it's alot).  Society hasn't collapsed and sex hasn't slowed down.  We're dirty, infested, colonized, cohabitated creatures.  That's just the way it is, it's part of being human, part of being alive.

[Joods]

There's a vaccine for HPV which -is- protection from genital warts.  Hell, the warty hpv is the good hpv...the shit that -doesn't- cause cervical cancer. Honestly though, whats wrong a with a wart.  Studded...for her pleasure, amiright?

(crabs, pfft, quick fix...I've had lice, who cares)

Warts are highly contagious. Matter of fact, if we see them on a client's skin, by state law, we are not allowed to proceed with the service and we have to recommend that they see a medical professional.

[The Grand Nudger]

When you say client...in this thread, Nympha....lol.......

[Joods]

Yeah I did think about that. For a millisecond.

Lmao

[paulpablo]

God gave us love, lust, sexual desire and feelings. He also lays out a responsible and acceptable outlet for those emotions.

I have heard sex compared to fire. Fire in the oven or fireplace will keep you warm or bake your cheesecake. Let it out and it will burn down your house.

Sexual promiscuity and the like have led to all manner of death and destruction and social collapse. If people kept sex monogamous and within the institution of marriage, the world would be much better off.

Before everyone jumps in and starts saying casual sex between consenting adults is perfectly ok and no harm comes from it. I will raise the BS flag now. I doubt those people have daughters (and mothers, but even Hitler had a mom) and want them to be sexually promiscuous town sluts, with a dozen children from a dozen men. Which can and would happen regardless of precautions or such. You don't need me to say this is wrong and immoral.

Was going to post this on anther thread but decided to make it one.

Apart from the god bit of the post, I sort of agree that the world might be better off in monogamous relationships and in 2 parent family house holds.

A lot of communities with 1 parent single mother house holds fail, not as a rule just an overall tendency.
Females tend to be more promiscuous without a father figure and men have no male role model.
Plus there's usually some dependence on welfare.

I've seen videos online that theorize that the root cause of events like the Milwaukee riots has nothing to do with race but everything to do with culture and single mothers trying to unsuccessfully raise bored, young jobless men who are in turn also not getting married or settling down.
Milwaukee is very very statistically high in the rates of births outside of marriage, I think possibly the highest in America or one of the highest.

I say all this as someone who has a daughter and I'm not with her mother anymore.
The situation just isn't ideal.
I give her money but I don't have enough money to save for my own house mortgage and buy her and my daughter a house aswell as my own, I think for most people that's the case in that they won't have that much money.
If we were together then we could pool our resources, easily buy a house and she would also get to spend more time with our child instead of going out to work herself.

I've resigned myself to thinking this is just the way my situation is now and all I can do is not be absent as much as possible despite long work hours and not living with my daughter.


Just to point something out though, it's totally understandable as to why people aren't completely monogamous through their life at least to a certain extent, it takes time to realise what makes you happy sexually, staying with the first person you have sex with forever might not necessarily be ideal either.

[vorlon13]

God gave us love, lust, sexual desire and feelings.  He also lays out a responsible and acceptable outlet for those emotions.

I have heard sex compared to fire.  Fire in the oven or fireplace will keep you warm or bake your cheesecake. Let it out and it will burn down your house.  

Sexual promiscuity and the like have led to all manner of death and destruction and social collapse.  If people kept sex monogamous and within the institution of marriage, the world would be much better off.

Before everyone jumps in and starts saying casual sex between consenting adults is perfectly ok and no harm comes from it.  I will raise the BS flag now. I doubt those people have daughters (and mothers, but even Hitler had a mom) and want them to be sexually promiscuous town sluts, with a dozen children from a dozen men.  Which can and would happen regardless of precautions or such.   You don't need me to say this is wrong and immoral.  

Was going to post this on anther thread but decided to make it one.

In the bold faced section, do you mean one man, one woman, once, conventional Jesus decreed Mark 10:11 marriage??  And if so, would your efforts be better spent trying to get more actual Jesus/Bible based religions on board with your and Jesus definition first rather than starting here in a herd of unbelievers??

Seems like folks already somewhat on board with Jesus-ism and Bible-ism might be a little more amenable to accepting they are effing up their religion once you point out some actual scripture that backs up your point.

Assuming you are successful and get the 70,000+ christian schisms in agreement THEN it might be somewhat more impressive when you come here and try to change our views on this.

And if you are not successful in your attempts at getting all the Jesus people synced up with Jesus's definition of marriage, maybe you could instead stop by here and explain why there is not universal agreement in Jesus world about Jesus's definition of marriage.

[paulpablo]

I'm just trying to keep it real.  The majority of sexing females in the US, at this very moment, have hpv (we don;t know with regards to the males, it doesn't present the same way - we assume it's alot).  Society hasn't collapsed and sex hasn't slowed down.  We're dirty, infested, colonized, cohabitated creatures.  That's just the way it is, it's part of being human, part of being alive.

I wasn't making the point that society will collapse because of hpv.

I was pointing out that its wrong to say that being as promoscious as you like as long as you use protection will cause no harm.

Now I was taking protection to mean using a condom, which might break.

If you take the term protection to literally be protected by condoms that won't break, a hpv vaccine and you're just talking about protection in the way that you're saying this person is protected from everything bad that could possibly happen, then yes person can have as much sex as they like and definitely nothing bad will happen.

In reality though a lot of people don't know about or don't have access to hpv vaccines. Use condoms that may break, so on and so forth.

I'm not saying something bad happening is statistically likely, just not impossible.

[The Grand Nudger]

I wasn't making the point that society will collapse because of hpv.

I was pointing out that its wrong to say that being as promoscious as you like as long as you use protection will cause no harm.

What harm will being -promiscuous- cause?  You;re stuck talking about diseases, but that's not promiscuity, it's unthinkingly fucking diseased people....and assuming that the people you fuck are invariably diseased.

Now I was taking protection to mean using a condom, which might break.

Oh nooooesssss!  You might...might, end up with a kid.  Perish the thought, the continuity of the human race, how horrible.  

If you take the term protection to literally be protected by condoms that won't break, a hpv vaccine and you're just talking about protection in the way that you're saying this person is protected from everything bad that could possibly happen, then yes person can have as much sex as they like and definitely nothing bad will happen.

In reality though a lot of people don't know about or don't have access to hpv vaccines. Use condoms that may break, so on and so forth.

I'm not saying something bad happening is statistically likely, just not impossible.

It would be nice if some of us didn't live in shitholes in which this vaccine was not available...or where puritanical asshats try their best to make people feel like shitty parents for considering it for their children...but that's the risk of living in a shithole full of puritans, not a risk of promiscuity.

The irony being that the puritanical impulse is a more effective contributor to all the things that the puritanical impulse fears than promiscuous (lol.......still amused that we're even pretending that this is a thing) sex is. Teen pregnancy, highest where "traditional values" are highest. Why? Because you can't talk about it, aren't supposed to think about it...it's taboo...and so ofc people are unprepared or uninformed. Hence a whole lotta babies.

[brewer]

What denomination were you, anyway?

I need that information for... reasons.  

The craziest. Pentecostal.

Did you ever speak in tongues..........................................................................................while on your knees?

[Esquilax]

Apart from the god bit of the post, I sort of agree that the world might be better off in monogamous relationships and in 2 parent family house holds.

A lot of communities with 1 parent single mother house holds fail, not as a rule just an overall tendency.
Females tend to be more promiscuous without a father figure and men have no male role model.
Plus there's usually some dependence on welfare.

I've seen videos online that theorize that the root cause of events like the Milwaukee riots has nothing to do with race but everything to do with culture and single mothers trying to unsuccessfully raise bored, young jobless men who are in turn also not getting married or settling down.
Milwaukee is very very statistically high in the rates of births outside of marriage, I think possibly the highest in America or one of the highest.

I say all this as someone who has a daughter and I'm not with her mother anymore.
The situation just isn't ideal.
I give her money but I don't have enough money to save for my own house mortgage and buy her and my daughter a house aswell as my own, I think for most people that's the case in that they won't have that much money.
If we were together then we could pool our resources, easily buy a house and she would also get to spend more time with our child instead of going out to work herself.

I've resigned myself to thinking this is just the way my situation is now and all I can do is not be absent as much as possible despite long work hours and not living with my daughter.


Just to point something out though, it's totally understandable as to why people aren't completely monogamous through their life at least to a certain extent, it takes time to realise what makes you happy sexually, staying with the first person you have sex with forever might not necessarily be ideal either.

Seems to me that a large portion of your actual issue here comes down to an income thing, and not a monogamy thing. I see no particular reason to lean back on- let's face it, kind of arbitrary- social mores to resolve an issue that could also be solved, and a few others besides, by addressing the economic disparities that make this kind of pooling of resources necessary in order to raise children.

This isn't me, by the way, shitting on the idea of monogamy, nor arguing in favor of the reverse, but I do look askance at a two-adult romantic relationship being the "proper" way to do things, for a number of reasons.