Posts: 8711
Threads: 128
Joined: March 1, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities?
August 31, 2016 at 2:29 pm
(August 30, 2016 at 8:33 pm)Whateverist Wrote: It's more fun to wait until they start in on each other. *goes to make popcorn* At least the believers on this forum are willing to challenge each other. Maybe it is confirmation bias but it truly seems to me that the atheist members do not challenge each other nearly so much. I have never seen one atheist debate another about causality for example . It is nearly always gang up on the theists.
Posts: 67034
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities?
August 31, 2016 at 2:39 pm
(This post was last modified: August 31, 2016 at 2:40 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
(August 31, 2016 at 2:25 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: No... I just disagree that different denominations, means a different Christology.... which you appear to be claiming. Some differences are merely organizational. Other's have to do with the nature of the church.
That's the usual counterclaim, that denominations are just differences in choir music or how much a pastor gets paid. It's not -actually- the reason for schisms, but hey...don't let that get in the way.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 67034
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities?
August 31, 2016 at 2:42 pm
(August 31, 2016 at 2:29 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: (August 30, 2016 at 8:33 pm)Whateverist Wrote: It's more fun to wait until they start in on each other. *goes to make popcorn* At least the believers on this forum are willing to challenge each other.
Are they........lol?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities?
August 31, 2016 at 2:43 pm
(August 31, 2016 at 2:29 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: At least the believers on this forum are willing to challenge each other. Maybe it is confirmation bias but it truly seems to me that the atheist members do not challenge each other nearly so much. I have never seen one atheist debate another about causality for example . It is nearly always gang up on the theists.
Challenge each other on what? Either science is wrong or the monotheistic deities are out of the window. That in itself doesn't mean that I spiritual entity is unimaginable. That's why my sig still read agnostic and will continue to read so. But any scripted god is utter bullshit in lights of what we know about the world and the universe.
Could a totally neutral higher intelligence exist? Certainly. I don't have evidence for or against it's existence. But a humanocnetric deity doesn't make any sense, given the short period of time humans have been around.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities?
August 31, 2016 at 3:08 pm
Still no clear statement what non-physical entities are?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 8711
Threads: 128
Joined: March 1, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities?
August 31, 2016 at 3:14 pm
(August 31, 2016 at 3:08 pm)Alex K Wrote: Still no clear statement what non-physical entities are?
As for me I word say that the meanings of words, language in general, is nonphysical. At the very least, it is irreducible.
Posts: 67034
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities?
August 31, 2016 at 3:20 pm
(This post was last modified: August 31, 2016 at 3:21 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
Strange, because machine language is not only physical, it's defined by it's physical structure, and reducible to the interactions of gates.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities?
August 31, 2016 at 3:20 pm
(August 31, 2016 at 3:14 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: (August 31, 2016 at 3:08 pm)Alex K Wrote: Still no clear statement what non-physical entities are?
As for me I word say that the meanings of words, language in general, is nonphysical. At the very least, it is irreducible.
Meanings of words are given by the way they are recognized by the neural networks in our brains. This is determined by physical structures, the corresponding information is stored in the positions of axons and synapses etc...
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 2084
Threads: 7
Joined: August 14, 2016
Reputation:
10
RE: What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities?
August 31, 2016 at 3:21 pm
(August 31, 2016 at 9:19 am)ChadWooters Wrote: I don't think that's quite right. Kant's position was that the mind shoehorns the affect of an incomprehensible reality-as-it-is into comprehensible categories. Otherwise I agree that materialism is a dying paradigm, which is why most serious atheistic thinkers have made the semantic shift to 'physicalism'. No one seriously believes anymore that the world is made of indivisible particles that interact mechanistically.
Don't tell the chemists...
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Posts: 67034
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities?
August 31, 2016 at 3:23 pm
(This post was last modified: August 31, 2016 at 3:25 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
Chemists don't believe in atomism either, lol.
Quote:Unlike their modern scientific namesake in atomic theory, philosophical atoms come in an infinite variety of shapes and sizes, each indestructible, immutable and surrounded by a void where they collide with the others or hook together forming a cluster.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomism
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
|
![[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-d-3rfdI7nG0%2FTerwtFyFXoI%2FAAAAAAAACak%2F7kFSmHeVrng%2Fs320%2FBumper%2BSticker%2B-%2BAsheville%2B-%2BPraise%2BDog3.JPG)
